DeGroot David W, Henderson Kaemmer N, O'Connor Francis G
The Army Heat Center, Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort Benning, Georgia.
Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Engineering (in support of The Army Heat Center), Martin Army Community Hospital, Fort Benning, Georgia.
J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb;64(2):175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.12.015. Epub 2023 Feb 17.
Cold-water immersion is the gold standard for field treatment of an exertional heat stroke (EHS) casualty. Practical limitations may preclude this method and ice sheets (bed linens soaked in ice water) have emerged as a viable alternative. Laboratory studies suggest that this is an inferior method; however, the magnitude of hyperthermia is limited and may underestimate the cooling rate in EHS casualties.
Our aim was to determine the prehospital core cooling rate, need for continued cooling on arrival to the emergency department, and mortality rate associated with ice sheet use.
De-identified retrospective data were obtained from emergency medical services (EMS) and included presence or absence of altered mental status, cooling measures applied prior to EMS arrival, and time and core temperature (T; rectal) on-scene and on hospital arrival. Cooling rate was calculated from time and temperature data. Mortality data were obtained from the U.S. Army Combat Readiness Center.
There were 462 casualties that met inclusion criteria. The cooling rate for the entire sample was 0.07°C ± 0.08°C · min. EHS casualties with an observed initial T < 39°C had an en route cooling rate of 0.03°C ± 0.04°C · min vs. initial T ≥ 39°C cooling rate of 0.16°C ± 0.08°C · min. There was one fatality due to EHS, for a mortality rate of 0.20% (95% CI 0.01-1.20%).
The cooling rate in EHS casualties with initial T ≥ 39°C was approximately double that reported in laboratory studies. The observed mortality rate was comparable with casualties treated with cold-water immersion. Our data suggest that ice sheets provide a viable alternative when practical constraints preclude cold-water immersion.
冷水浸泡是野外治疗劳力性热射病(EHS)伤员的金标准。实际限制可能使这种方法无法实施,冰床单(浸泡在冰水中的床单)已成为一种可行的替代方法。实验室研究表明这是一种较差的方法;然而,体温过高的程度有限,可能低估了EHS伤员的降温速率。
我们的目的是确定院前核心降温速率、到达急诊科后继续降温的需求以及与使用冰床单相关的死亡率。
从紧急医疗服务(EMS)获取去识别化的回顾性数据,包括意识状态是否改变、EMS到达之前采取的降温措施以及现场和医院到达时的时间和核心温度(T;直肠温度)。根据时间和温度数据计算降温速率。死亡率数据来自美国陆军作战准备中心。
有462名伤员符合纳入标准。整个样本的降温速率为0.07°C ± 0.08°C·分钟。初始T < 39°C的EHS伤员途中降温速率为0.03°C ± 0.04°C·分钟,而初始T≥39°C的降温速率为0.16°C ± 0.08°C·分钟。有1例因EHS死亡,死亡率为0.20%(95%CI 0.01 - 1.20%)。
初始T≥39°C的EHS伤员的降温速率约为实验室研究报道的两倍。观察到的死亡率与冷水浸泡治疗的伤员相当。我们的数据表明,当实际限制使冷水浸泡无法实施时,冰床单是一种可行的替代方法。