• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在髋关节翻修手术中使用标准长度的锥形股骨柄来解决 Paprosky Ⅰ-Ⅱ型股骨缺损:一项 87 例患者的前瞻性研究。

The use of a standard-length conical tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty to address Paprosky type I-II femoral defects: a prospective study of 87 patients.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.

Department of Research, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Sep;143(9):5945-5955. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04797-y. Epub 2023 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1007/s00402-023-04797-y
PMID:36806987
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10449674/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Low-grade femoral defects in revision total hip arthroplasty (rTHA) might be preferably treated with a primary implant. Almost no previous study reported the use of standard-length conical tapered (SLCT) stems in these cases. We analyzed a series of cases using a SLCT stem in rTHA with Paprosky type I-II femoral defects. The purpose of the study was to determine clinical and radiographic outcomes in this series of rTHA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively followed 87 patients undergoing a femoral component rTHA: 53 Paprosky type I and 34 type II femoral defects. Patient-reported measures (Oxford Hip Score, EQ-5D, VAS pain during rest and activity) were administered at baseline, 1 and 2 years post-operatively. Radiographic subsidence overtime was scored. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the subsidence over time, the complication-free survival, and the implant survivorship with reoperation and stem revision as endpoints.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 72.5 (SD ± 23.9) months. All PROMs significatively improved over time. The average subsidence was 2.8 (SD ± 3.2), 3.6 (SD ± 4.4), and 4.0 (SD ± 4.9) mm at 4, 12, and 24 months respectively. 6 stems had subsidence > 10 mm. The survival without complication was 0.85 (95% CI 0.94-0.77), while the implant survival without reoperation was 0.83 (95% CI 0.95-0.72). The overall stem survival rate was 93.7% (95% CI 0.91-0.97) at 2 years.

CONCLUSION

The use of a SLCT stem in rTHA with Paprosky type I-II femoral defects demonstrated good survival with low subsidence rates during the first 2 years after surgery. Surgeons should consider the use of this primary prosthesis as a potential treatment during stem revision in cases with limited femoral bone loss.

摘要

介绍

在翻修全髋关节置换术(rTHA)中,低级别股骨缺损可能最好采用初次植入物治疗。几乎没有先前的研究报道在这些病例中使用标准长度锥形锥形(SLCT)柄。我们分析了一组使用 SLCT 柄治疗 Paprosky Ⅰ-Ⅱ型股骨缺损的 rTHA 病例。本研究的目的是确定该系列 rTHA 的临床和影像学结果。

材料与方法

我们前瞻性随访了 87 例接受股骨部件 rTHA 的患者:53 例 Paprosky Ⅰ型和 34 例Ⅱ型股骨缺损。患者报告的测量(牛津髋关节评分、EQ-5D、休息和活动时的 VAS 疼痛)在基线、术后 1 年和 2 年进行。随访期间记录了影像学下沉情况。Kaplan-Meier 曲线用于评估随时间推移的下沉、无并发症生存、以再次手术和柄翻修为终点的植入物存活率。

结果

平均随访时间为 72.5(SD±23.9)个月。所有 PROM 均随时间显著改善。平均下沉量分别为 4、12 和 24 个月时的 2.8(SD±3.2)、3.6(SD±4.4)和 4.0(SD±4.9)mm。6 个柄发生下沉>10mm。无并发症生存为 0.85(95%CI 0.94-0.77),无再手术的植入物生存为 0.83(95%CI 0.95-0.72)。2 年后,总体柄存活率为 93.7%(95%CI 0.91-0.97)。

结论

在 Paprosky Ⅰ-Ⅱ型股骨缺损的 rTHA 中使用 SLCT 柄,在术后 2 年内表现出良好的存活率和较低的下沉率。在股骨骨量有限的情况下,外科医生应考虑将这种初次假体作为柄翻修的潜在治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/2b11825b2835/402_2023_4797_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/db261fe535c1/402_2023_4797_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/e9e0de652e88/402_2023_4797_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/e4e6d8bb7fb8/402_2023_4797_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/405d3a271f3d/402_2023_4797_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/2b11825b2835/402_2023_4797_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/db261fe535c1/402_2023_4797_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/e9e0de652e88/402_2023_4797_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/e4e6d8bb7fb8/402_2023_4797_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/405d3a271f3d/402_2023_4797_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4633/10449674/2b11825b2835/402_2023_4797_Fig5_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The use of a standard-length conical tapered stem in hip revision arthroplasty to address Paprosky type I-II femoral defects: a prospective study of 87 patients.在髋关节翻修手术中使用标准长度的锥形股骨柄来解决 Paprosky Ⅰ-Ⅱ型股骨缺损:一项 87 例患者的前瞻性研究。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2023 Sep;143(9):5945-5955. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-04797-y. Epub 2023 Feb 20.
2
Stay Short or Go Long in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Paprosky Type II Femoral Defects: A Comparative Study With the Use of an Uncemented Distal Fixating Modular Stem and a Primary Monobloc Conical Stem With 5-Year Follow-Up.在 Paprosky Ⅱ型股骨缺损的全髋关节翻修术中截骨短缩或延长:使用非骨水泥远端固定模块化柄和一体式锥形柄的 5 年随访比较研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Nov;37(11):2239-2246. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 7.
3
Nonmodular Tapered Fluted Titanium Stems Osseointegrate Reliably at Short Term in Revision THAs.非模块化锥形带槽钛柄在翻修全髋关节置换术中短期内能可靠地实现骨整合。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):186-192. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5091-x. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
4
Radiographic and Clinical Outcomes of Modular Tapered Fluted Stems for Femoral Revision for Paprosky III and IV Femoral Defects or Vancouver B2 and B3 Femoral Fractures.模块化锥形开槽柄在治疗 Paprosky III 和 IV 型股骨缺损或 Vancouver B2 和 B3 型股骨骨折的股骨翻修中的影像学和临床结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Apr;35(4):1069-1073. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.039. Epub 2019 Nov 30.
5
Short-term outcomes with the REDAPT monolithic, tapered, fluted, grit-blasted, forged titanium revision femoral stem.REDAPT 一体式、渐缩、带槽、喷砂、锻造钛制翻修股骨柄的短期疗效。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Feb;102-B(2):191-197. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B2.BJJ-2019-0743.R1.
6
Incidence and Predictors of Subsidence Using Modular, Tapered, Fluted Titanium Femoral Stems in Aseptic Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.在无菌性翻修全髋关节置换术中使用模块化、锥形、带槽钛股骨柄的下沉发生率及预测因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 May;39(5):1304-1311. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.057. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
7
Bicortical Contact Predicts Subsidence of Modular Tapered Stems in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.双皮质接触可预测翻修全髋关节置换术中模块化锥形柄的下沉。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2195-2199. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.047. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
8
Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Monoblock Splined Tapered Grit-Blasted Titanium Stem.单块式带螺纹锥形喷砂钛合金柄的翻修全髋关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Dec;32(12):3698-3703. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.06.045. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
9
Subsidence Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular and Monolithic Components.翻修术后使用组合式和一体式假体的全髋关节置换术后下沉。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6S):S299-S303. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
10
Modern Revision Femoral Stem Designs Have No Difference in Rates of Subsidence.现代翻修股骨柄设计在下沉率方面没有差异。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Jan;36(1):268-273. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.07.078. Epub 2020 Aug 5.

引用本文的文献

1
The Zweymüller primary stem is a reliable, effective, and less invasive implant in revision hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type I and II defects.对于Paprosky I型和II型缺损的髋关节翻修术,Zweymüller原发性柄是一种可靠、有效且侵入性较小的植入物。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Feb 13;6(2):186-194. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.62.BJO-2024-0182.R1.
2
Long stem revision versus short stem revision with plate osteosynthesis for Vancouver type B2 periprosthetic femoral fracture: a comparative study of eighty five cases.长柄翻修与短柄翻修加钢板内固定治疗 Vancouver B2 型假体周围股骨骨折:85 例对比研究。
Int Orthop. 2024 Aug;48(8):1997-2005. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06181-w. Epub 2024 Apr 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Stay Short or Go Long in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty With Paprosky Type II Femoral Defects: A Comparative Study With the Use of an Uncemented Distal Fixating Modular Stem and a Primary Monobloc Conical Stem With 5-Year Follow-Up.在 Paprosky Ⅱ型股骨缺损的全髋关节翻修术中截骨短缩或延长:使用非骨水泥远端固定模块化柄和一体式锥形柄的 5 年随访比较研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Nov;37(11):2239-2246. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 7.
2
Preoperative Patient Factors and Postoperative Complications as Risk Factors for New-Onset Depression Following Total Hip Arthroplasty.术前患者因素和术后并发症是全髋关节置换术后新发抑郁症的危险因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Mar;36(3):1120-1125. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.10.009. Epub 2020 Oct 16.
3
Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of a Conical Prosthesis Used in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.用于翻修全髋关节置换术的锥形假体的短期临床结果
Surg Technol Int. 2020 May 28;36:63-69.
4
Wagner Cone Midterm Survivorship and Outcomes.瓦格纳圆锥中期生存率和结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Aug;35(8):2155-2160. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.03.015. Epub 2020 Mar 14.
5
Re-revision total hip arthroplasty: Epidemiology and factors associated with outcomes.翻修全髋关节置换术:流行病学及与预后相关的因素。
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2020 Jan-Feb;11(1):43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2018.08.021. Epub 2018 Aug 28.
6
Femoral revision with primary cementless stems: a systematic review of the literature.使用初次非骨水泥型股骨柄进行股骨翻修术:文献系统综述
Musculoskelet Surg. 2018 Apr;102(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s12306-017-0487-7. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
7
Stay Short or Go Long? Can a Standard Cemented Femoral Prosthesis Be Used at Second-Stage Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision for Infection Following an Extended Trochanteric Osteotomy?选择短柄还是长柄?在大转子延长截骨术后因感染进行二期全髋关节置换翻修时,标准骨水泥型股骨假体是否可用?
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2226-2230. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
8
CORR® Curriculum - Orthopaedic Education: Orthopaedic Surgery Education in China.CORR® 课程 - 骨科教育:中国的骨外科教育
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Jan;475(1):35-38. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5162-z. Epub 2016 Nov 14.
9
Can a Silver-Coated Arthrodesis Implant Provide a Viable Alternative to Above Knee Amputation in the Unsalvageable, Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty?对于无法挽救的感染性全膝关节置换术,镀银关节融合植入物能否成为膝上截肢的可行替代方案?
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Nov;31(11):2542-2547. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.04.009. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
10
Femoral revision with a primary cementless stem.使用初次非骨水泥型股骨柄进行股骨翻修。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2016 Apr;102(2):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2015.12.014. Epub 2016 Feb 10.