Electromyostimulation With Blood Flow Restriction for Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome in Active Duty Military Personnel: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

INTRODUCTION

The high prevalence of patellofemoral pain in military service members results in strength loss, pain, and functional limitations during required physical performance tasks. Knee pain is often the limiting factor during high-intensity exercise for strengthening and functional improvement, thus limiting certain therapies. Blood flow restriction (BFR) improves muscle strength when combined with resistance or aerobic exercise and may serve as a possible alternative to high-intensity training during recovery. In our previous work, we showed that Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) improves pain, strength, and function in patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), which led us to ask whether the addition of BFR to NMES would result in further improvements. This randomized controlled trial compared knee and hip muscle strength, pain, and physical performance of service members with PFPS who received BFR-NMES (80% limb occlusion pressure [LOP]) or BFR-NMES set at 20 mmHg (active control/sham) over 9 weeks.

METHODS

This randomized controlled trial randomly assigned 84 service members with PFPS to one of the two intervention groups. In-clinic BFR-NMES was performed two times per week, while at-home NMES with exercise and at-home exercise alone were performed on alternating days and omitted on in-clinic days. The outcome measures included strength testing of knee extensor/flexor and hip posterolateral stabilizers, 30-second chair stand, forward step-down, timed stair climb, and 6-minute walk.

RESULTS

Improvement was observed in knee extensor (treated limb, P < .001) and hip strength (treated hip, P = .007) but not flexor over 9 weeks of treatment; however, there was no difference between high BFR (80% LOP) and BFR-sham. Physical performance and pain measures showed similar improvements over time with no differences between groups. In analyzing the relationship between the number of BFR-NMES sessions and the primary outcomes, we found significant relationships with improvements in treated knee extensor strength (0.87 kg/session, P < .0001), treated hip strength (0.23 kg/session, P = .04), and pain (-0.11/session, P < .0001). A similar set of relationships was observed for the time of NMES usage for treated knee extensor strength (0.02/min, P < .0001) and pain (-0.002/min, P = .002).

CONCLUSION

NMES strength training offers moderate improvements in strength, pain, and performance; however, BFR did not provide an additive effect to NMES plus exercise. Improvements were positively related to the number of BFR-NMES treatments and NMES usage.