• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Tp-e 间期、Tp-e/QT 和 Tp-e/QTc 对肝硬化患者疾病严重程度的预测价值。

Predictive value of Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT, and Tp-e/QTc for disease severity in patients with liver cirrhosis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, University of Gaziantep, Gaziantep, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Feb;27(3):1110-1120. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202302_31214.

DOI:10.26355/eurrev_202302_31214
PMID:36808359
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The cardiovascular system is one of the most affected systems in the liver cirrhosis (LC) process, especially due to the tendency to arrhythmia. Since the data about the relationship between LC and novel electrocardiography (ECG) indexes are lacking, we aimed to investigate the association between LC and Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT, and Tp-e/QTc ratio.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 100 patients in the study group (56 male, median age 60) and 100 in the control group (52 female, 60 median age) between January 2021 and January 2022. ECG indexes and laboratory findings were analyzed.

RESULTS

The patient group had significantly higher heart rate (HR), Tp-e, Tp-e/QT, and Tp-e/QTc compared to the control group (p < 0.001 for all). There was no difference in terms of QT, QTc, QRS (depolarization of ventricles, involving Q, R, and S waves on ECG) duration, and ejection fraction between the two groups. Kruskal-Wallis test results revealed that there was a significant difference between Child stages in terms of HR, QT, QTc, Tp-e, Tp-e/QT, Tp-e/QTc, and QRS duration. There was also a significant difference between the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score groups in terms of all these parameters except for Tp-e/QTc. In the ROC analyses of Tp-e, Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc to predict the Child C, the AUC values were 0.887; (95% CI: 0.853-0.921), 0.730; (95% CI: 0.680-0.780), and 0.670; (95% CI: 0.614-0.726), respectively. Similarly, AUC values for the MELD score > 20 were 0.877; (95% CI: 0.854-0.900), 0.935; (95% CI: 0.918-0.952), and 0.861; (95% CI: 0.835-0.887); (p < 0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Tp-e, Tp-e/QT, and Tp-e/QTc values were significantly higher in patients with LC. These indexes can be useful for arrhythmia risk stratification and to predict the end-stage of the disease.

摘要

目的

心血管系统是肝硬化(LC)过程中受影响最严重的系统之一,尤其是心律失常的倾向。由于缺乏关于 LC 与新型心电图(ECG)指标之间关系的数据,我们旨在研究 LC 与 Tp-e 间期、Tp-e/QT 和 Tp-e/QTc 比值之间的关系。

患者和方法

本研究纳入了 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 1 月期间的 100 例研究组患者(56 名男性,中位年龄 60 岁)和 100 例对照组患者(52 名女性,中位年龄 60 岁)。分析了心电图指标和实验室检查结果。

结果

与对照组相比,患者组的心率(HR)、Tp-e、Tp-e/QT 和 Tp-e/QTc 明显更高(所有 p<0.001)。两组之间的 QT、QTc、QRS(心室除极,包括 ECG 上的 Q、R 和 S 波)持续时间和射血分数没有差异。Kruskal-Wallis 检验结果表明,HR、QT、QTc、Tp-e、Tp-e/QT、Tp-e/QTc 和 QRS 持续时间在 Child 分期之间存在显著差异。MELD 评分组之间在除 Tp-e/QTc 之外的所有参数方面也存在显著差异。在 Tp-e、Tp-e/QT 和 Tp-e/QTc 预测 Child C 的 ROC 分析中,AUC 值分别为 0.887(95%CI:0.853-0.921)、0.730(95%CI:0.680-0.780)和 0.670(95%CI:0.614-0.726)。同样,MELD 评分>20 的 AUC 值分别为 0.877(95%CI:0.854-0.900)、0.935(95%CI:0.918-0.952)和 0.861(95%CI:0.835-0.887)(所有 p<0.001)。

结论

LC 患者的 Tp-e、Tp-e/QT 和 Tp-e/QTc 值明显更高。这些指标可用于心律失常风险分层和预测疾病终末期。

相似文献

1
Predictive value of Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT, and Tp-e/QTc for disease severity in patients with liver cirrhosis.Tp-e 间期、Tp-e/QT 和 Tp-e/QTc 对肝硬化患者疾病严重程度的预测价值。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Feb;27(3):1110-1120. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202302_31214.
2
Evaluation of index of cardiac-electrophysiological balance before and after hemodialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease.终末期肾病患者血液透析前后心脏电生理平衡指数的评估
J Electrocardiol. 2019 May-Jun;54:72-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2019.03.011. Epub 2019 Mar 22.
3
Tp-e Interval, Tp-e/QTc Ratio, and Fragmented QRS Are Correlated with the Severity of Liver Cirrhosis.Tp-e间期、Tp-e/QTc比值和碎裂QRS波与肝硬化严重程度相关。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017 Jan;22(1). doi: 10.1111/anec.12359. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
4
Evaluation of Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio and index of cardiac-electrophysiological balance in patients with tinnitus.耳鸣患者 Tp-e 间期、Tp-e/QT 比值及心电生理平衡指数的评估。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021 Aug 30;21(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02227-8.
5
Evaluation of index of cardiac-electrophysiological balance in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage.评价蛛网膜下腔出血患者的心脏电生理平衡指数。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022 Nov 10;22(1):477. doi: 10.1186/s12872-022-02924-y.
6
Evaluation of Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio and Tp-e/QTc ratio in patients with acute myocarditis.评价急性心肌炎患者的 Tp-e 间期、Tp-e/QT 比值和 Tp-e/QTc 比值。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12872-019-1207-z.
7
Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT ratio, and Tp-e/QTc ratio are prolonged in patients with moderate and severe obstructive sleep apnea.中重度阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的Tp-e间期、Tp-e/QT比值和Tp-e/QTc比值延长。
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2012 Aug;35(8):966-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03439.x. Epub 2012 Jun 5.
8
Tp-e interval, Tp-e/QT and Tp-e/QTc ratio in hypertensive patients with primary aldosteronism.原发性醛固酮增多症患者的 Tp-e 间期、Tp-e/QT 比值和 Tp-e/QTc 比值。
Clin Exp Hypertens. 2020;42(1):93-98. doi: 10.1080/10641963.2019.1632341. Epub 2019 Jun 15.
9
Evaluation of Tpeak-Tend interval and Tpeak-end/QT ratio in patients with Sarcoidosis.结节病患者的T峰-T终间期及T峰-终末/QT比值评估。
Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis. 2016 Aug 1;33(2):151-6.
10
Evaluation of Tp-e interval and Tp-e/QT ratio in major burn patients.大面积烧伤患者Tp-e间期及Tp-e/QT比值的评估
J Electrocardiol. 2020 May-Jun;60:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.04.001. Epub 2020 Apr 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Tpeak-Tend ECG Marker in Obesity and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.肥胖与心血管疾病中的Tpeak-Tend心电图标志物:综述
Scientifica (Cairo). 2024 Jun 26;2024:4904508. doi: 10.1155/2024/4904508. eCollection 2024.
2
Corrected QT interval in cirrhosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肝硬化患者的校正QT间期:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
World J Hepatol. 2023 Sep 27;15(9):1060-1083. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v15.i9.1060.