Sampaio de Oliveira Manuel Lucas, Uchida Thomas K
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ottawa, 161 Louis-Pasteur, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada.
J Biomech Eng. 2023 Jul 1;145(7). doi: 10.1115/1.4056948.
Sophisticated muscle material models are required to perform detailed finite element simulations of soft tissue; however, state-of-the-art muscle models are not among the built-in materials in popular commercial finite element software packages. Implementing user-defined muscle material models is challenging for two reasons: deriving the tangent modulus tensor for a material with a complex strain energy function is tedious and programing the algorithm to compute it is error-prone. These challenges hinder widespread use of such models in software that employs implicit, nonlinear, Newton-type finite element methods. We implement a muscle material model in Ansys using an approximation of the tangent modulus, which simplifies its derivation and implementation. Three test models were constructed by revolving a rectangle (RR), a right trapezoid (RTR), and a generic obtuse trapezoid (RTO) around the muscle's centerline. A displacement was applied to one end of each muscle, holding the other end fixed. The results were validated against analogous simulations in FEBio, which uses the same muscle model but with the exact tangent modulus. Overall, good agreement was found between our Ansys and FEBio simulations, though some noticeable discrepancies were observed. For the elements along the muscle's centerline, the root-mean-square-percentage error in the Von Mises stress was 0.00%, 3.03%, and 6.75% for the RR, RTR, and RTO models, respectively; similar errors in longitudinal strain were observed. We provide our Ansys implementation so that others can reproduce and extend our results.
要对软组织进行详细的有限元模拟,需要复杂的肌肉材料模型;然而,最先进的肌肉模型并不在流行的商业有限元软件包的内置材料之中。实现用户定义的肌肉材料模型具有挑战性,原因有两个:对于具有复杂应变能函数的材料,推导切线模量张量很繁琐,并且编写计算它的算法容易出错。这些挑战阻碍了此类模型在采用隐式、非线性、牛顿型有限元方法的软件中的广泛使用。我们在Ansys中使用切线模量的近似值实现了一个肌肉材料模型,这简化了其推导和实现。通过将一个矩形(RR)、一个直角梯形(RTR)和一个普通钝角梯形(RTO)围绕肌肉中心线旋转来构建三个测试模型。在每个肌肉的一端施加位移,另一端保持固定。将结果与FEBio中的类似模拟进行了验证,FEBio使用相同的肌肉模型,但使用的是精确的切线模量。总体而言,我们的Ansys模拟和FEBio模拟之间发现了良好的一致性,尽管观察到了一些明显的差异。对于沿肌肉中心线的单元,RR、RTR和RTO模型在冯·米塞斯应力中的均方根百分比误差分别为0.00%、3.03%和6.75%;在纵向应变中也观察到了类似的误差。我们提供了我们的Ansys实现,以便其他人可以重现和扩展我们的结果。