Logue J N, Sachais B A, Feighner J P
J Clin Pharmacol. 1979 Jan;19(1):64-74. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1979.tb01618.x.
The efficacy and safety of maprotiline (Ludiomil) was compared to imipramine in patients with manic-depressive illness, depressed type (DSM II 296.2). Three hundred forty-one patients from 16 different centers entered this four-week double-blind controlled trial, with 171 in the maprotiline and 170 in the imipramine group. Efficacy measurements included the Hamilton Depression Scale, the Self-Rating Depression Scale, and the Investigator's Overall Assessment of Effectiveness. Tolerability was monitored by collection of treatment-emergent signs and symptoms (TESS), blood pressure and pulse measurements, EKGs, and EEGs. Dosage was fixed for the first week at 50 mg t.i.d. and thereafter could be varied between 50 and 300 mg daily. Clinically and statistically significant reductions in symptomatology were noted in both drug groups for most efficacy parameters at each visit during therapy. Comparison between the drug groups revealed no difference in terms of the scales utilized. A trend toward fewer TESS in the maprotiline group was noted, especially for the side effects nausea, nervousness, and increased sweating.
在躁郁症抑郁型(DSM II 296.2)患者中,对麦普替林(路滴美)与丙咪嗪的疗效和安全性进行了比较。来自16个不同中心的341名患者进入了这项为期四周的双盲对照试验,其中171名患者接受麦普替林治疗,170名患者接受丙咪嗪治疗。疗效测量包括汉密尔顿抑郁量表、自评抑郁量表以及研究者对疗效的总体评估。通过收集治疗中出现的体征和症状(TESS)、血压和脉搏测量、心电图和脑电图来监测耐受性。第一周剂量固定为每日三次,每次50毫克,此后每日剂量可在50至300毫克之间变动。在治疗期间的每次访视中,两个药物组的大多数疗效参数在症状学方面均出现了具有临床意义和统计学意义的降低。药物组之间在所用量表方面没有差异。注意到麦普替林组出现TESS的趋势较少,尤其是在恶心、紧张和出汗增多等副作用方面。