Scarpaci J L
University of Iowa.
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1987 Fall;12(3):551-67. doi: 10.1215/03616878-12-3-551.
Since 1973 the Chilean junta has privatized sectors of the national economy. This paper analyzes the country's policy process of promoting private medical programs through HMO-like plans (ISAPREs, or Institutes of Provisional Health). These plans have captured less than half of their originally anticipated market share. It is argued that the future performance of ISAPREs will be undermined by their limited maternal benefits, their targeting to a small upper-income group which cannot sustain many private medical programs, and competition with less expensive yet equally competent public medical programs. The paper briefly compares privatization in Chile with the experiences of other countries, and specifically contrasts the restructuring of health services under military rule in Chile with those of Argentina and Uruguay. The paper concludes that the Chilean experience with HMOs epitomizes the perils of planning health care during short-term periods of economic prosperity as well as failing to consult medical care providers and consumers.
自1973年以来,智利军政府已将国民经济的一些部门私有化。本文分析了该国通过类似健康维护组织的计划(即预支医疗金机构,或临时健康协会)来推动私人医疗项目的政策过程。这些计划所占据的市场份额还不到其最初预期的一半。有人认为,预支医疗金机构未来的表现将受到以下因素的影响:其产妇福利有限,目标客户群体为小型高收入群体,而这一群体无法支撑众多私人医疗项目,同时还面临着与费用较低但同样称职的公共医疗项目的竞争。本文简要比较了智利的私有化与其他国家的经历,特别对比了智利军事统治下的医疗服务重组与阿根廷和乌拉圭的情况。本文得出结论,智利健康维护组织的经历体现了在短期经济繁荣时期规划医疗保健的风险,以及未能咨询医疗服务提供者和消费者的问题。