Nasrallah S M, Johnston G S, Gadacz T R, Kim K M
Department of Medicine, University of Maryland, School of Medicine, Baltimore.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1987 Oct;9(5):514-7. doi: 10.1097/00004836-198710000-00004.
We evaluated the significance of bile seen in the stomach at the time of endoscopy. Twenty-three percent of 110 consecutive patients undergoing elective panendoscopy were found to have bile in their stomachs. Gastric biopsies were obtained from these patients. To assess the significance of bile reflux, the patients underwent a quantitative gastric bile analysis on two separate days. On day 1, gastric juice was aspirated by nasogastric suction, and bile acid concentrations were measured. On day 2, bile reflux into the stomach was quantitated by scintiscan measurement of gastric nucleotide after intravenous administration of 99mTc-DISIDA. Approximately half the patients with bile reflux showed histologic evidence of mucosal injury. However, fewer than half with histologic injury had significant bile reflux when measured by quantitative methods. There was no correlation among the gastric bile acid concentration, degree of histologic injury, or severity of endoscopic changes. We conclude that finding bile reflux at endoscopy is probably of no clinical significance.
我们评估了内镜检查时胃内胆汁的意义。在连续接受选择性全内镜检查的110例患者中,23%被发现胃内有胆汁。从这些患者身上获取了胃活检组织。为评估胆汁反流的意义,患者在两个不同日期接受了定量胃胆汁分析。第1天,通过鼻胃管抽吸胃液并测量胆汁酸浓度。第2天,静脉注射99mTc - DISIDA后,通过闪烁扫描测量胃核苷酸来定量胆汁反流到胃内的情况。大约一半有胆汁反流的患者显示出黏膜损伤的组织学证据。然而,通过定量方法测量时,组织学损伤患者中不到一半有明显的胆汁反流。胃胆汁酸浓度、组织学损伤程度或内镜改变的严重程度之间没有相关性。我们得出结论,内镜检查时发现胆汁反流可能没有临床意义。