Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, İzmir Kâtip Çelebi University, Basın Sitesi Mahallesi Gazeteci Hasan Tahsin Caddesi, İzmir, Turkey.
Acta Neurol Belg. 2023 Aug;123(4):1345-1354. doi: 10.1007/s13760-023-02212-2. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
This study aimed at investigating the effect of a single-session repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex on poststroke upper-limb spasticity.
The study consisted of the following three independent parallel arms: inhibitory rTMS (n = 12), excitatory rTMS (n = 12), and sham stimulation (n = 13). The primary and secondary outcome measures were the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) and F/M amplitude ratio, respectively. A clinically meaningful difference was defined as a reduction in at least one MAS score.
There was a statistically significant change in MAS score within only the excitatory rTMS group over time [median (interquartile range) of - 1.0 (- 1.0 to - 0.5), p = 0.004]. However, groups were comparable in terms of median changes in MAS scores (p > 0.05). The proportions of patients achieving at least one MAS score reduction (9/12 in the excitatory rTMS group, 5/12 in the inhibitory rTMS group, and 5/13 in the control group) were also comparable (p = 0.135). For the F/M amplitude ratio, main time effect, main intervention effect, and time-intervention interaction effect were not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
Modulation of the contralesional dorsal premotor cortex with a single-session of excitatory or inhibitory rTMS does not appear to have an immediate anti-spastic effect beyond sham/placebo. The implication of this small study remains unclear and further studies into excitatory rTMS for the treatment of moderate-to-severe spastic paresis in poststroke patients should be undertaken.
NCT04063995 (clinicaltrials.gov).
本研究旨在探讨单次重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)对脑卒中后上肢痉挛的健侧背侧运动前皮质的影响。
该研究由三个独立的平行臂组成:抑制性 rTMS(n=12)、兴奋性 rTMS(n=12)和假刺激(n=13)。主要和次要结局指标分别为改良 Ashworth 量表(MAS)和 F/M 振幅比。定义临床有意义的差异为 MAS 评分至少降低一个等级。
仅在兴奋性 rTMS 组中,MAS 评分随时间呈统计学显著变化[中位数(四分位距)为-1.0(-1.0 至-0.5),p=0.004]。然而,各组 MAS 评分的中位数变化无统计学差异(p>0.05)。至少有一个 MAS 评分降低的患者比例(兴奋性 rTMS 组 9/12,抑制性 rTMS 组 5/12,对照组 5/13)也相似(p=0.135)。对于 F/M 振幅比,主要时间效应、主要干预效应和时间-干预交互效应均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
单次健侧背侧运动前皮质的兴奋性或抑制性 rTMS 调节似乎不会产生即时的抗痉挛作用,超过假刺激/安慰剂的效果。这项小研究的意义仍不清楚,应该进行更多关于兴奋性 rTMS 治疗脑卒中后中重度痉挛性瘫痪的研究。
NCT04063995(clinicaltrials.gov)。