Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Appl Clin Inform. 2023 Mar;14(2):345-353. doi: 10.1055/a-2040-0578. Epub 2023 Feb 21.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) commonly leads to iron deficiency anemia (IDA). Rates of screening and treatment of IDA are often low. A clinical decision support system (CDSS) embedded in an electronic health record could improve adherence to evidence-based care. Rates of CDSS adoption are often low due to poor usability and fit with work processes. One solution is to use human-centered design (HCD), which designs CDSS based on identified user needs and context of use and evaluates prototypes for usefulness and usability.
this study aimed to use HCD to design a CDSS tool called the IBD Anemia Diagnosis Tool, IADx.
Interviews with IBD practitioners informed creation of a process map of anemia care that was used by an interdisciplinary team that used HCD principles to create a prototype CDSS. The prototype was iteratively tested with "Think Aloud" usability evaluation with clinicians as well as semi-structured interviews, a survey, and observations. Feedback was coded and informed redesign.
Process mapping showed that IADx should function at in-person encounters and asynchronous laboratory review. Clinicians desired full automation of clinical information acquisition such as laboratory trends and analysis such as calculation of iron deficit, less automation of clinical decision selection such as laboratory ordering, and no automation of action implementation such as signing medication orders. Providers preferred an interruptive alert over a noninterruptive reminder.
Providers preferred an interruptive alert, perhaps due to the low likelihood of noticing a noninterruptive advisory. High levels of desire for automation of information acquisition and analysis with less automation of decision selection and action may be generalizable to other CDSSs designed for chronic disease management. This underlines the ways in which CDSSs have the potential to augment rather than replace provider cognitive work.
炎症性肠病(IBD)常导致缺铁性贫血(IDA)。IDA 的筛查和治疗率往往较低。嵌入电子健康记录的临床决策支持系统(CDSS)可以提高循证护理的依从性。由于可用性差且与工作流程不匹配,CDSS 的采用率往往较低。一种解决方案是使用以人为中心的设计(HCD),它根据已识别的用户需求和使用上下文来设计 CDSS,并评估原型的有用性和可用性。
本研究旨在使用 HCD 设计一种名为 IBD 贫血诊断工具(IADx)的 CDSS 工具。
对 IBD 从业者进行访谈,以创建贫血护理流程图,该流程图由跨学科团队使用 HCD 原则创建原型 CDSS。该原型通过与临床医生进行“大声思考”可用性评估以及半结构化访谈、调查和观察进行迭代测试。反馈被编码并重新设计。
流程映射表明,IADx 应该在面对面的就诊和异步实验室审查中发挥作用。临床医生希望实现临床信息采集的完全自动化,例如实验室趋势和分析,例如计算缺铁量,临床决策选择的自动化程度较低,例如实验室订单,并且操作实施的自动化程度较低,例如签署药物订单。提供者更喜欢中断式警报而不是非中断式提醒。
提供者更喜欢中断式警报,这可能是因为他们不太可能注意到非中断式咨询。对信息采集和分析的自动化以及对决策选择和操作的自动化程度较低的高度愿望可能适用于为慢性病管理设计的其他 CDSS。这强调了 CDSS 具有增强而不是替代提供者认知工作的潜力。