• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜微型胃旁路术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在代谢手术中的应用:单中心经验。

Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in metabolic surgery A single center experience.

出版信息

Ann Ital Chir. 2023;94:11-18.

PMID:36810258
Abstract

AIM

The safety and effectiveness of MGB versus LSG remain unclear. In this study, we It has been shown by many clinical studies that laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) and mini-gastric bypass (MGB), two current methods in metabolic surgery, may be alternatives to Roux-en-Y gastric aimed to compare the postoperative outcomes of MGB and LSG procedures performed in bariatric surgery.

MATERIAL METHODS

A total of 175 patients who underwent MGB and LSG surgery between 2016 and 2018 at a single metabolic surgery center were analyzed retrospectively. Two surgical procedures were compared in terms of the perioperative, early and late postoperative outcomes.

RESULTS

There were 121 patients in the MGB group and 54 patients in the LSG group. No significant difference was found between the groups regarding the operating time, the conversion to open surgery and the early postoperative complications (p>0.05). The length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the MGB group (p:0.001). The excess weight loss (EWL%) and total weight loss (TWL%) were significantly higher in the MGB group (90.3 vs. 79.2; and 36.4 vs 30.5, respectively). No significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of the remission rates of comorbidities. The symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux were observed in a significantly fewer number of the patients in the MGB group (6 patients 4.9% vs. 10 patients 18.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Both LSG and MGB are effective, reliable, and useful methods in metabolic surgery. The MGB procedure is superior to the LSG in terms of the length of hospital stay, EWL%, TWL% and the postoperative gastroesophageal reflux symptoms.

KEY WORDS

Metabolic surgery, Mini gastric bypass, Postoperative outcomes, Sleeve gastrectomy.

摘要

目的

MGB 与 LSG 的安全性和有效性尚不清楚。本研究旨在比较减重手术中两种当前方法(腹腔镜袖状胃切除术(LSG)和迷你胃旁路术(MGB))的术后结果。

材料和方法

回顾性分析了 2016 年至 2018 年期间在一家代谢手术中心接受 MGB 和 LSG 手术的 175 例患者。比较了两种手术方法在围手术期、早期和晚期术后结果方面的差异。

结果

MGB 组 121 例,LSG 组 54 例。两组患者的手术时间、中转开腹率及早期术后并发症差异均无统计学意义(p>0.05)。MGB 组患者的住院时间明显缩短(p:0.001)。MGB 组的额外体重减轻率(EWL%)和总体重减轻率(TWL%)明显高于 LSG 组(90.3% vs. 79.2%和 36.4% vs. 30.5%)。两组在并发症缓解率方面差异无统计学意义。MGB 组胃食管反流症状的患者明显较少(6 例 4.9% vs. 10 例 18.5%)。

结论

LSG 和 MGB 都是代谢手术中有效、可靠和有用的方法。MGB 术在住院时间、EWL%、TWL%和术后胃食管反流症状方面优于 LSG 术。

关键词

代谢手术;迷你胃旁路术;术后结果;袖状胃切除术。

相似文献

1
Laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy in metabolic surgery A single center experience.腹腔镜微型胃旁路术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术在代谢手术中的应用:单中心经验。
Ann Ital Chir. 2023;94:11-18.
2
A 7-Year Clinical Audit of 1107 Cases Comparing Sleeve Gastrectomy, Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass, and Mini-Gastric Bypass, to Determine an Effective and Safe Bariatric and Metabolic Procedure.对1107例患者进行7年临床审计,比较袖状胃切除术、Roux-en-Y胃旁路术和迷你胃旁路术,以确定一种有效且安全的减肥和代谢手术方法。
Obes Surg. 2016 May;26(5):926-32. doi: 10.1007/s11695-015-1869-2.
3
Complications Following the Mini/One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB/OAGB): a Multi-institutional Survey on 2678 Patients with a Mid-term (5 Years) Follow-up.迷你/单吻合口胃旁路术(MGB/OAGB)后的并发症:一项对2678例患者进行中期(5年)随访的多机构调查
Obes Surg. 2017 Nov;27(11):2956-2967. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2726-2.
4
LSG vs MGB-OAGB-3 Year Follow-up Data: a Randomised Control Trial.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与改良胃旁路术-全腹腔镜下全胃旷置术3年随访数据:一项随机对照试验
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2820-2828. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3255-3.
5
Analysis of the five-year outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy and mini gastric bypass: a report from the Indian sub-continent.袖状胃切除术和迷你胃旁路手术五年疗效分析:来自印度次大陆的报告。
Obes Surg. 2014 Oct;24(10):1724-8. doi: 10.1007/s11695-014-1264-4.
6
Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的疗效比较:基于 18 项研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Mar 6.
7
Effect of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass on Weight Loss in Patients With Morbid Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术对病态肥胖患者体重减轻的影响:SM-BOSS随机临床试验
JAMA. 2018 Jan 16;319(3):255-265. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.20897.
8
Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy-a Single-Center, Retrospective Study.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术的长期结局——一项单中心回顾性研究
Obes Surg. 2018 Jan;28(1):130-134. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2795-2.
9
Quality of Life 1 Year After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: a Randomized Controlled Trial Focusing on Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.腹腔镜袖状胃切除术与腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术后1年的生活质量:一项聚焦于胃食管反流病的随机对照试验
Obes Surg. 2017 Oct;27(10):2557-2565. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2688-4.
10
Comparative analysis for the effect of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs sleeve gastrectomy in patients with morbid obesity: Evidence from 11 randomized clinical trials (meta-analysis).对比分析肥胖症患者行 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术与袖状胃切除术的效果:来自 11 项随机临床试验的证据(荟萃分析)。
Int J Surg. 2019 Dec;72:216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.11.013. Epub 2019 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass versus laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy on hypertension and dyslipidemia in obese type 2 diabetes mellitus patients.腹腔镜迷你胃旁路术与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术对肥胖2型糖尿病患者高血压和血脂异常的影响
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Jul 10;85(9):4334-4341. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000001080. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Effect of intraoperative mild hyperventilation on the incidence of shoulder pain after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: A randomized, controlled trial.术中轻度过度通气对腹腔镜袖状胃切除术术后肩痛发生率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Jun 2;102(22):e33905. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033905.