Tsunoda Masato, Miura Yoshimasa, Osawa Hiroyuki, Nagayama Manabu, Kagaya Yuka, Funayama Yohei, Kobayashi Takuma, Togashi Mami, Hayashi Hiroki, Hiraoka Yuji, Nomoto Yoshie, Iwashita Chihiro, Ino Yuji, Takahashi Haruo, Fukuda Hisashi, Lefor Alan Kawarai, Yamamoto Hironori
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Department of Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Japan.
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2023 May;39(5):533-543. doi: 10.1002/kjm2.12660. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
The pink color sign in iodine unstained areas is useful to differentiate esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from other lesions. However, some ESCCs have obscure color findings which affect the ability of endoscopists to differentiate these lesions and determine the resection line. Using white light imaging (WLI), linked color imaging (LCI) and blue laser imaging (BLI), 40 early ESCCs were retrospectively evaluated using images before and after iodine staining. Visibility scores for ESCC by expert and non-expert endoscopists were compared using these three modalities and color differences measured for malignant lesions and surrounding mucosa. BLI had the highest score and color difference without iodine staining. Each determination with iodine was much higher than without iodine regardless of the modality. With iodine, ESCC mainly appeared pink, purple and green using WLI, LCI and BLI, respectively and visibility scores determined by non-experts and experts were significantly higher for LCI (both p < 0.001) and BLI (p = 0.018 and p < 0.001) than for WLI. The score with LCI was significantly higher than with BLI among non-experts (p = 0.035). With iodine, the color difference using LCI was twice that with WLI and one with BLI was significantly larger than with WLI (p < 0.001). These greater tendencies were found regardless of location, depth of cancer or intensity of pink color using WLI. In conclusion, areas of ESCC unstained by iodine were easily recognized using LCI and BLI. Visibility of these lesions is excellent even by non-expert endoscopists, suggesting that this method is useful to diagnose ESCC and determine the resection line.
碘不着色区域的粉红色征象有助于鉴别食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)与其他病变。然而,一些ESCC的颜色表现不明显,这影响了内镜医师鉴别这些病变和确定切除线的能力。利用白光成像(WLI)、联动成像(LCI)和蓝光成像(BLI),对40例早期ESCC进行回顾性评估,使用碘染色前后的图像。使用这三种模式比较专家和非专家内镜医师对ESCC的可视性评分,并测量恶性病变与周围黏膜的颜色差异。BLI在未进行碘染色时具有最高的评分和颜色差异。无论采用何种模式,使用碘进行的每次判定都比不使用碘时高得多。使用碘时,ESCC在WLI、LCI和BLI下分别主要呈现粉红色、紫色和绿色,非专家和专家确定的LCI可视性评分(均p<0.001)和BLI可视性评分(p = 0.018和p<0.001)均显著高于WLI。在非专家中,LCI的评分显著高于BLI(p = 0.035)。使用碘时,LCI的颜色差异是WLI的两倍,BLI的颜色差异明显大于WLI(p<0.001)。无论癌症的位置、深度或WLI下粉红色的强度如何,都发现了这些更明显的趋势。总之,使用LCI和BLI可以很容易地识别未被碘染色的ESCC区域。即使是非专家内镜医师,这些病变的可视性也非常好,这表明该方法有助于诊断ESCC并确定切除线。