Suppr超能文献

补充肌酸联合血流限制训练增强肌肉厚度和性能:一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究。

Creatine supplementation combined with blood flow restriction training enhances muscle thickness and performance: a randomized, placebo-controlled, and double-blind study.

机构信息

Laboratory of Skeletal Muscle Biology and Human Strength Performance (LABFORCEH), Federal University of Maranhão (UFMA), São Luís-MA, Brazil.

Health Sciences Graduate Program, Biological and Health Sciences Center, Federal University of Maranhão, São Luís-MA, 65080-805, Brazil.

出版信息

Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2023 Jun 1;48(6):417-426. doi: 10.1139/apnm-2022-0209. Epub 2023 Feb 22.

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effects of an 8-week creatine (CR) or placebo (PL) supplementation on muscle strength, thickness, endurance, and body composition employing different training paradigms with blood flow restriction (BFR) vs. traditional resistance training (TRAD). Seventeen healthy males were randomized between the PL ( = 9) and CR ( = 8) groups. Participants were trained unilaterally utilizing a within-between subject bicep curl exercise where each arm was allocated to TRAD or BFR for 8 weeks. Muscular strength, thickness, endurance, and body composition were evaluated. Creatine supplementation promoted increases in muscle thickness in TRAD and BFR compared with their placebo counterparts, however, without a significant difference between treatments ( = 0.349). TRAD training increased maximum strength (1 repetition maximum (1RM)) compared with BFR after 8 weeks of training ( = 0.021). Repetitions to failure at 30% of 1RM were increased in the BFR-CR group compared with the TRAD-CR group ( = 0.004). Repetitions to failure at 70% 1RM were increased from weeks 0-4 ( < 0.05) and 4-8 ( < 0.05) in all groups. Creatine supplementation exerted a hypertrophic effect when utilized with TRAD and BFR paradigms and increased muscle performance at 30% 1RM when utilized in conjunction with BFR. Therefore, creatine supplementation seems to amplify muscle adaptation following a BFR program. Registered in the Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials (ReBEC), under the registration number: RBR-3vh8zgj.

摘要

本研究旨在比较 8 周肌酸(CR)或安慰剂(PL)补充对肌肉力量、厚度、耐力和身体成分的影响,采用血流限制(BFR)与传统抗阻训练(TRAD)的不同训练模式。17 名健康男性随机分为 PL(n=9)和 CR(n=8)组。参与者采用单臂、内-间设计进行肱二头肌弯举训练,每只手臂分别接受 TRAD 或 BFR 训练 8 周。评估肌肉力量、厚度、耐力和身体成分。与安慰剂相比,CR 补充剂可增加 TRAD 和 BFR 中的肌肉厚度,但治疗之间无显著差异(β=0.349)。TRAD 训练可增加 8 周训练后的 1 重复最大强度(1RM)(β=0.021)。与 TRAD-CR 组相比,BFR-CR 组在 30%1RM 时的力竭重复次数增加(β=0.004)。所有组在 0-4 周(<0.05)和 4-8 周(<0.05)时,70%1RM 的力竭重复次数增加。CR 补充剂与 TRAD 和 BFR 模式联合使用时具有促肥大作用,与 BFR 联合使用时可提高 30%1RM 时的肌肉性能。因此,在进行 BFR 训练时,CR 补充剂似乎会增强肌肉适应能力。本研究已在巴西临床试验注册中心(ReBEC)注册,注册号:RBR-3vh8zgj。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验