Nuclear Medicine Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
Section of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124, Bari, Italy.
BMC Med Imaging. 2023 Feb 22;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s12880-023-00989-5.
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) represents the 6th leading cancer worldwide. In most cases, patients present a locally advanced disease at diagnosis and non-surgical curative treatment is considered the standard of care. Nowadays, [F]FDG PET/CT is a validated tool in post-treatment evaluation, with a high level of evidence. However, to standardize imaging response, several visual scales have been proposed with none of them approved yet. The study's aim is a head-to-head comparison between the diagnostic performance of the Hopkins criteria, the Deauville score, and the new proposed Cuneo score, to establish their prognostic role. Secondly, we investigate the possible value of semiquantitative analysis, evaluating SUV and ΔSUV of the lymph node with the highest uptake on the restaging PET scan. Moreover, we also considered morphological features using the product of diameters measured on the co-registered CT images to assess the added value of hybrid imaging.
We performed a retrospective analysis on histologically proven HNSCC patients who underwent baseline and response assessment [F]FDG PET/CT. Post-treatment scans were reviewed according to Hopkins, Deauville, and Cuneo criteria, assigning a score to the primary tumor site and lymph nodes. A per-patient final score for each scale was chosen, corresponding to the highest score between the two sites. Diagnostic performance was then calculated for each score considering any evidence of locoregional progression in the first 3 months as the gold standard. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. SUV and its delta, as well as the product of diameters of the lymph node with the highest uptake at post-treatment scan, if present, were calculated.
A total of 43 patients were finally included in the study. Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy were 87%, 86%, 76%, 92%, and 86% for the Hopkins score, whereas 93%, 79%, 70%, 96%, and 84% for the Deauville score, respectively. Conversely, the Cuneo score reached the highest specificity and PPV (93% and 78%, respectively) but the lowest sensitivity (47%), NPV (76%), and accuracy (77%). Each scale significantly correlated with PFS and OS. The ROC analysis of the combination of SUV and the product of diameters of the highest lymph node on the restaging PET scan reached an AUC of 0.822. The multivariate analysis revealed the Cuneo criteria and the product of diameters as prognostic factors for PFS.
Each visual score statistically correlated with prognosis thus demonstrating the reliability of point-scale criteria in HNSCC. The novel Cuneo score showed the highest specificity, but the lowest sensibility compared to Hopkins and Deauville criteria. Furthermore, the combination of PET data with morphological features could support the evaluation of equivocal cases.
头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)是全球第 6 大常见癌症。在大多数情况下,患者在诊断时表现为局部晚期疾病,非手术治愈性治疗被认为是标准治疗方法。如今,[F]FDG PET/CT 是一种经过验证的治疗后评估工具,具有较高的证据水平。然而,为了规范影像学反应,已经提出了几种视觉量表,但没有一种得到认可。本研究旨在对头颈癌的 Hopkins 标准、Deauville 评分和新提出的 Cuneo 评分的诊断性能进行直接比较,以确定它们的预后作用。其次,我们探讨了半定量分析的可能价值,即评估再分期 PET 扫描中摄取最高的淋巴结的 SUV 和 ΔSUV。此外,我们还使用在配准 CT 图像上测量的直径的乘积来评估形态特征,以评估混合成像的附加价值。
我们对经组织学证实的头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者接受了基线和反应评估[F]FDG PET/CT。根据 Hopkins、Deauville 和 Cuneo 标准对治疗后扫描进行评估,对原发肿瘤部位和淋巴结进行评分。为每个量表选择一个患者的最终评分,该评分对应于两个部位中最高的评分。然后,对于任何在最初 3 个月内出现局部区域进展的证据,计算每个量表的每个评分的诊断性能作为金标准。使用 Kaplan-Meier 方法进行生存分析。计算治疗后扫描中摄取最高的淋巴结的 SUV 和其 delta 以及直径的乘积,如果存在的话。
最终共有 43 名患者纳入本研究。Hopkins 评分的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV 和准确性分别为 87%、86%、76%、92%和 86%,而 Deauville 评分的敏感性、特异性、PPV、NPV 和准确性分别为 93%、79%、70%、96%和 84%。相反,Cuneo 评分达到了最高的特异性和 PPV(分别为 93%和 78%),但敏感性(47%)、NPV(76%)和准确性(77%)最低。每个量表与 PFS 和 OS 均显著相关。再分期 PET 扫描中 SUV 和摄取最高的淋巴结直径乘积的 ROC 分析达到了 0.822 的 AUC。多变量分析显示 Cuneo 标准和直径乘积是 PFS 的预后因素。
每个视觉评分与预后均具有统计学相关性,因此证明了点评分标准在 HNSCC 中的可靠性。与 Hopkins 和 Deauville 标准相比,新提出的 Cuneo 标准的特异性最高,但敏感性最低。此外,将 PET 数据与形态特征相结合,可以支持对不确定病例的评估。