• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经颈动脉血管重建术治疗颈动脉狭窄后,通过扩散加权磁共振成像对新的脑内病变进行定量分析。

Quantification of new intracerebral lesions on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after transcarotid artery revascularization for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.

作者信息

Balceniuk Mark D, Gonring Dakota, Wang Maxwell, Westfall Cynthia, Portanova Anthony, Stoner Michael C, Mix Doran S

机构信息

Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Imaging Sciences, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Jan 14;9(1):101102. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101102. eCollection 2023 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101102
PMID:36814540
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9939726/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has been used with increasing prevalence for treatment of carotid artery stenosis. TCAR holds potential benefits over traditional carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or transfemoral carotid artery stenting by its nature of being less invasive than CEA but more neuroprotective than transfemoral carotid artery stenting. The purpose of this pilot study is to evaluate the effectiveness of the neuroprotection system of TCAR with flow reversal by quantifying the incidence and degree of new intracerebral lesions using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI). This study is the first to evaluate these findings in a real-world, high-risk cohort, who would have been excluded from the ROADSTER and ENROUTE transcarotid neuroprotection system DW-MRI studies.

METHODS

Patients undergoing unilateral TCAR for symptomatic or asymptomatic severe internal carotid artery disease were eligible and prospectively enrolled in the study. All patients had high risk features, including comorbidities or medications, which excluded them from industry-sponsored DW-MRI trials. Patients underwent a preoperative DW-MRI to obtain a baseline intracerebral evaluation within 1 week of the scheduled surgery. The follow-up DW-MRI occurred within 48 hours postoperatively. The primary outcome was new, acute postoperative lesion(s) identified on DW-MRI. Secondary outcomes include any major stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during hospitalization.

RESULTS

Five consecutive patients underwent TCAR with preoperative and postoperative imaging. All five patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy before their procedure and verified to be therapeutic on these agents. All patients underwent a right-sided TCAR and three were symptomatic as the indication for their procedure. All five patients demonstrated chronic lesions on the preoperative DW-MRI. Technical success was achieved in all five patients, with one operative complication involving a dissection of the common carotid at the access site, which was stented using the TCAR system. Postoperative DW-MRI did not identify any new intracerebral lesions in any patient following the procedure. No patient had a stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world, high-risk cohort, TCAR was completed with no evidence of new, postoperative DW-MRI lesions. These data further demonstrate that TCAR with flow reversal is an effective neuroprotective strategy for carotid revascularization. Further study is warranted to evaluate DW-MRI differences between TCAR and CEA.

摘要

目的

经颈动脉血管重建术(TCAR)在治疗颈动脉狭窄中的应用日益普遍。与传统的颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)或经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术相比,TCAR具有潜在优势,其侵入性小于CEA,但神经保护作用优于经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术。本前瞻性研究旨在通过弥散加权磁共振成像(DW-MRI)量化新的脑内病变的发生率和程度,评估血流逆转的TCAR神经保护系统的有效性。本研究首次在真实世界的高危队列中评估这些结果,这些患者被排除在ROADSTER和ENROUTE经颈动脉神经保护系统DW-MRI研究之外。

方法

因有症状或无症状的严重颈内动脉疾病接受单侧TCAR的患者符合条件并前瞻性纳入本研究。所有患者均具有高风险特征,包括合并症或正在服用的药物,这使他们被排除在行业赞助的DW-MRI试验之外。患者在预定手术的1周内接受术前DW-MRI检查,以获得脑内基线评估。术后DW-MRI检查在术后48小时内进行。主要结局是DW-MRI上发现的新的急性术后病变。次要结局包括住院期间发生的任何严重卒中、心肌梗死或死亡。

结果

连续5例患者接受了TCAR手术,并进行了术前和术后影像学检查。所有5例患者在手术前均接受双联抗血小板治疗,并证实这些药物治疗有效。所有患者均接受了右侧TCAR手术,其中3例有症状,作为手术指征。所有5例患者术前DW-MRI均显示有陈旧性病变。所有5例患者手术均获成功,1例手术并发症为穿刺部位颈总动脉夹层,使用TCAR系统置入支架。术后DW-MRI检查未发现任何患者有新的脑内病变。住院期间无患者发生卒中、心肌梗死或死亡。

结论

在这个真实世界的高危队列中,完成TCAR手术后未发现新的术后DW-MRI病变。这些数据进一步表明,血流逆转的TCAR是一种有效的颈动脉血管重建神经保护策略。有必要进一步研究以评估TCAR和CEA之间DW-MRI的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85f/9939726/32ccca993c34/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85f/9939726/32ccca993c34/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e85f/9939726/32ccca993c34/gr1.jpg

相似文献

1
Quantification of new intracerebral lesions on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging after transcarotid artery revascularization for treatment of carotid artery stenosis.经颈动脉血管重建术治疗颈动脉狭窄后,通过扩散加权磁共振成像对新的脑内病变进行定量分析。
J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023 Jan 14;9(1):101102. doi: 10.1016/j.jvscit.2023.101102. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
Anesthetic choice during transcarotid artery revascularization and carotid endarterectomy affects the risk of myocardial infarction.经颈动脉血管重建术和颈动脉内膜切除术期间的麻醉选择会影响心肌梗死风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;74(4):1281-1289. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.03.037. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
3
Propensity score-matched analysis of 1-year outcomes of transcarotid revascularization with dynamic flow reversal, carotid endarterectomy, and transfemoral carotid artery stenting.经颈动脉血管重建术(动态血流逆转)、颈动脉内膜切除术和经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术1年结局的倾向评分匹配分析。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Jan;75(1):213-222.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.242. Epub 2021 Sep 6.
4
Transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉动脉血运重建与经股颈动脉血管成形术。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):92-103.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
5
Outcomes of transfemoral carotid artery stenting and transcarotid artery revascularization for restenosis after prior ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy.经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术和颈动脉内膜切除术治疗同侧颈动脉再狭窄后的转颈动脉血运重建术的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Feb;75(2):561-571.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.07.245. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
6
Analysis of the ROADSTER pivotal and extended-access cohorts shows excellent 1-year durability of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.ROADSTER 关键和扩展准入队列分析显示,使用动态血流反转行颈动脉支架术具有优异的 1 年耐久性。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jun;69(6):1786-1796. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.08.179. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
A multi-institutional analysis of transcarotid artery revascularization compared to carotid endarterectomy.多机构分析经颈动脉血运重建术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):123-129. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.060. Epub 2019 Jan 6.
8
Early Outcomes in the ROADSTER 2 Study of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Patients With Significant Carotid Artery Disease.ROADSTER 2 研究:经颈动脉血运重建术治疗重度颈动脉疾病患者的早期结果。
Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):2620-2629. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030550. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
9
Evaluating postoperative outcomes in patients with hostile neck anatomy undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting.评估颈部解剖结构复杂的患者接受经颈动脉血管重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术的术后结局。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Jan;77(1):191-200. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.08.030. Epub 2022 Aug 30.
10
Physiologic risk factors increase risk of myocardial infarction with transcarotid artery revascularization in prospective trials.生理风险因素会增加经颈动脉血运重建术治疗的前瞻性试验中心肌梗死的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2023 Apr;77(4):1192-1198. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.12.013. Epub 2022 Dec 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Perioperative Stroke on Survival After Carotid Intervention.围手术期卒中对颈动脉介入治疗后生存的影响。
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2024 Apr;58(3):280-286. doi: 10.1177/15385744231207015. Epub 2023 Oct 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization and Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stenting Based on High Risk Anatomic Characteristics.基于高风险解剖特征的颈动脉血运重建术与经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术的比较。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2022 Nov;87:21-30. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2022.03.034. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
One-year outcomes after transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in the ROADSTER 2 trial.ROADSTER 2 试验中经颈动脉血运重建术(TCAR)治疗一年后的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2022 Aug;76(2):466-473.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.03.872. Epub 2022 Apr 2.
3
Technical tips for success in transcarotid artery revascularization.
经颈动脉血运重建术成功的技术要点。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2020 Jun-Sep;33(1-2):4-9. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2020.05.001. Epub 2020 May 16.
4
Early Outcomes in the ROADSTER 2 Study of Transcarotid Artery Revascularization in Patients With Significant Carotid Artery Disease.ROADSTER 2 研究:经颈动脉血运重建术治疗重度颈动脉疾病患者的早期结果。
Stroke. 2020 Sep;51(9):2620-2629. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030550. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
5
Outcomes and strategy of tailored antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor in patients undergoing transcarotid artery revascularization.经颈动脉血运重建术患者使用替格瑞洛进行个体化抗血小板治疗的结局和策略。
J Vasc Surg. 2021 Jan;73(1):132-141. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2020.04.518. Epub 2020 May 20.
6
Transcarotid artery revascularization versus transfemoral carotid artery stenting in the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative.血管外科学会血管质量倡议中的经颈动脉动脉血运重建与经股颈动脉血管成形术。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;69(1):92-103.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.05.011. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
7
Results of the ROADSTER multicenter trial of transcarotid stenting with dynamic flow reversal.ROADSTER经颈动脉支架置入术联合动态血流逆转多中心试验的结果
J Vasc Surg. 2015 Nov;62(5):1227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.04.460.
8
Safety and feasibility of a novel transcervical access neuroprotection system for carotid artery stenting in the PROOF Study.在 PROOF 研究中,新型经颈入路神经保护系统在颈动脉支架置入术中的安全性和可行性。
J Vasc Surg. 2011 Nov;54(5):1317-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.04.040. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
9
Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis.颈动脉狭窄的血管内支架成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术治疗的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):11-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0912321. Epub 2010 May 26.
10
New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS).症状性颈动脉狭窄支架置入或内膜切除术治疗后 MRI 新出现的缺血性脑损伤:国际颈动脉支架研究(ICSS)的一个亚研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2010 Apr;9(4):353-62. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70057-0. Epub 2010 Feb 25.