Suppr超能文献

牙髓治疗中患者的召回率:一项批判性综述。

Recall Rates of Patients in Endodontic Treatments: A Critical Review.

作者信息

da Silva Alexandre Marques Paes, Lopes Cristiane Barbosa, Vaz de Azevedo Kátia Regina, Rosana de Lima Ribeiro Andrade Helena Teixeira, Vidal Fábio, Souza Gonçalves Lucio, Marques Ferreira Manuel, de Carvalho Ferreira Dennis

机构信息

Estácio de Sá University, UNESA, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.

Department of the Postgraduate Program in Dentistry, Estácio de Sá University, UNESA, Rio de Janeiro (RJ), Brazil.

出版信息

Iran Endod J. 2019 Summer;14(3):171-177. doi: 10.22037/iej.v14i3.23577.

Abstract

The number of patients that return for recall appointments has great importance to validate endodontic treatment outcomes. The purpose of this review was to investigate the rate of return on recall and the main factors that influence this rate of return. A literature review was performed in the PubMed database for the years from 1978 to 2017, using the following keywords: recall rate, endodontic treatment, endodontic retreatment, apical surgery. The inclusion criteria were: prospective studies in English, and research with humans, which included patient return rates. A total of 35 studies that fulfilled the established criteria were selected. The percentage of patients who returned on recall was 56%. More female patients (60%) attended the recall appointments than male (40%). The three main reasons for not returning were: patients did not observe the follow-up appointment (490), not returning due to a lack of interest (99) and changing their address (222). The age of the patients attending the appointments varied from 28.6 to 62 years old, with the highest percentage of patients that returned ranging from 40 to 52.5 years old. According to the literature the optimal rate of return for follow-up treatment should be greater than 80%, for the validity of the research. However, the reality presented in the studies is far from ideal. Many studies do not even mention these rates of return in their methodologies or in their results, which may mask the true treatment success rates.

摘要

前来复诊的患者数量对于验证牙髓治疗效果至关重要。本综述的目的是调查复诊率以及影响该复诊率的主要因素。在PubMed数据库中对1978年至2017年期间的文献进行了综述,使用了以下关键词:复诊率、牙髓治疗、牙髓再治疗、根尖手术。纳入标准为:英文前瞻性研究以及涉及人类的研究,其中包括患者复诊率。共选择了35项符合既定标准的研究。复诊患者的百分比为56%。前来复诊的女性患者(60%)多于男性患者(40%)。未复诊的三个主要原因是:患者未遵守随访预约(490例)、因缺乏兴趣未复诊(99例)以及更改地址(222例)。前来就诊的患者年龄在28.6岁至62岁之间,复诊患者比例最高的年龄段为40岁至52.5岁。根据文献,为保证研究的有效性,后续治疗的最佳复诊率应大于80%。然而,研究中呈现的实际情况远非理想。许多研究甚至在其方法或结果中未提及这些复诊率,这可能掩盖了真正的治疗成功率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8eb6/9940020/35aa02ad1bcf/IEJ-14-171-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验