• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

强化血压控制与标准血压控制对认知功能的影响:STEP随机对照试验分析

Effects of intensive vs. standard blood pressure control on cognitive function: analysis of the STEP randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Fan Jiali, Bai Jingjing, Liu Wei, Cai Jun

机构信息

Department of Hypertension, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Fuwai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.

Department of Cardiology, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University Fourth Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1042637. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1042637. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2023.1042637
PMID:36816574
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9930906/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The STEP (Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the older Hypertensive Patients) trial showed that intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control resulted in a lower incidence of cardiovascular events than standard treatment. This study analyzed the effects of intensive SBP lowering on cognitive function.

METHODS

STEP was a multicenter, randomized controlled trial of hypertensive patients aged 60-80 years. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to SBP goals of 110-130 mmHg (intensive treatment) or 130-150 mmHg (standard treatment). Each individual was asked to complete a cognitive function test (Mini-Mental State Examination; MMSE) at baseline and during follow-up. The primary outcome for this study was the annual change in MMSE score. Subjects with a score less than education-specific cutoff point were categorized as cognitive decline.

RESULTS

The analysis enrolled 6,501 participants (3,270 participants in the intensive-treatment and 3,231 participants in the standard-treatment groups). Median follow-up was 3.34 years. There was a minor change in MMSE score, with an annual change of -0.001 [95% confidence interval [CI] -0.020, 0.018] and 0.030 (95% CI 0.011, 0.049) in the intensive- and standard-treatment groups, respectively ( = 0.052). Cognitive decline occurred in 46/3,270 patients (1.4%) in the intensive-treatment group and 42/3,231 (1.3%) in the standard-treatment group (hazard ratio 0.005, 95% CI 0.654, 1.543, = 0.983).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with standard treatment, intensive SBP treatment did not result in a significant change in cognitive function test score. The impact of intensive blood pressure lowering was not evident using this global cognitive function test.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT03015311.

摘要

背景

STEP(老年高血压患者血压干预策略)试验表明,与标准治疗相比,强化收缩压(SBP)控制可降低心血管事件的发生率。本研究分析了强化降低SBP对认知功能的影响。

方法

STEP是一项针对60 - 80岁高血压患者的多中心随机对照试验。参与者被随机分配(1:1)至SBP目标为110 - 130 mmHg(强化治疗)或130 - 150 mmHg(标准治疗)。每位个体在基线和随访期间均被要求完成一项认知功能测试(简易精神状态检查表;MMSE)。本研究的主要结局是MMSE评分的年度变化。得分低于特定教育程度截断点的受试者被归类为认知功能减退。

结果

该分析纳入了6501名参与者(强化治疗组3270名参与者,标准治疗组3231名参与者)。中位随访时间为3.34年。MMSE评分有微小变化,强化治疗组和标准治疗组的年度变化分别为 - 0.001 [95%置信区间(CI) - 0.020, 0.018] 和0.030(95% CI 0.011, 0.049)(P = 0.052)。强化治疗组46/3270例患者(1.4%)发生认知功能减退,标准治疗组42/3231例患者(1.3%)发生认知功能减退(风险比0.005,95% CI 0.654, 1.543,P = 0.983)。

结论

与标准治疗相比,强化SBP治疗并未导致认知功能测试评分出现显著变化。使用这种整体认知功能测试,强化降压的影响并不明显。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov。唯一标识符:NCT03015311。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ef/9930906/35dcd73481de/fneur-14-1042637-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ef/9930906/1778928d83c0/fneur-14-1042637-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ef/9930906/dc9a15c7865a/fneur-14-1042637-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ef/9930906/35dcd73481de/fneur-14-1042637-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ef/9930906/1778928d83c0/fneur-14-1042637-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ef/9930906/dc9a15c7865a/fneur-14-1042637-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89ef/9930906/35dcd73481de/fneur-14-1042637-g0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Effects of intensive vs. standard blood pressure control on cognitive function: analysis of the STEP randomized controlled trial.强化血压控制与标准血压控制对认知功能的影响:STEP随机对照试验分析
Front Neurol. 2023 Feb 1;14:1042637. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1042637. eCollection 2023.
2
Achieved systolic blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in 60-80-year-old patients: the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial.60至80岁患者的收缩压达标情况及心血管结局:老年高血压患者血压干预策略(STEP)试验
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;30(10):1017-1027. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad142.
3
Intensive blood pressure lowering and the risk of new-onset diabetes in patients with hypertension: a post-hoc analysis of the STEP randomized trial.强化降压与高血压患者新发糖尿病风险:STEP 随机试验的事后分析。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Aug 1;30(10):988-995. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad105.
4
Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Treatment Upon Erectile Function in Hypertensive Men: Findings From the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial.强化与标准血压治疗对高血压男性勃起功能的影响:来自收缩压干预试验的结果。
J Sex Med. 2020 Feb;17(2):238-248. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.11.256. Epub 2019 Dec 18.
5
Influence of baseline arterial stiffness on effects of intensive compared with standard blood pressure control: a post hoc analysis of the STEP trial.强化降压与标准降压治疗效果比较的基础动脉僵硬度影响:STEP 试验的事后分析。
BMC Med. 2022 Oct 20;20(1):358. doi: 10.1186/s12916-022-02556-1.
6
The Influence of baseline glycemic status on the effects of intensive blood pressure lowering: Results from the STEP randomized trial.强化降压对血糖基线状态影响的研究:来自 STEP 随机试验的结果。
Eur J Intern Med. 2023 Jul;113:75-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2023.04.019. Epub 2023 May 2.
7
Effects of Intensive Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering on Cardiovascular Events and Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Standard Glycemic Control and in Those Without Diabetes Mellitus: Reconciling Results From ACCORD BP and SPRINT.强化收缩压降压治疗对标准血糖控制的 2 型糖尿病患者及无糖尿病患者心血管事件和死亡率的影响:来自 ACCORD BP 和 SPRINT 的结果再分析。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 18;7(18):e009326. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009326.
8
Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control and Cardiovascular Disease Outcomes in Adults Aged ≥75 Years: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对≥75岁成年人心血管疾病结局的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2016 Jun 28;315(24):2673-82. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.7050.
9
Influence of baseline systolic blood pressure on the relationship between intensive blood pressure control and cardiovascular outcomes in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).强化血压控制与心血管结局试验(SPRINT)中基线收缩压对血压控制与心血管结局关系的影响。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2019 Mar;108(3):273-281. doi: 10.1007/s00392-018-1353-9. Epub 2018 Aug 24.
10
Association of serum uric acid with benefits of intensive blood pressure control.血清尿酸与强化血压控制获益的关联。
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2023 Aug;76(8):635-644. doi: 10.1016/j.rec.2023.01.003. Epub 2023 Jan 28.

引用本文的文献

1
White matter changes underlie hypertension-related cognitive decline in older adults.高血压相关认知衰退与老年人的白质变化有关。
Neuroimage Clin. 2023;38:103389. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103389. Epub 2023 Mar 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Effect of Antihypertensive Treatment on Cerebral Blood Flow in Older Adults: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.抗高血压治疗对老年人脑血流的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Hypertension. 2022 May;79(5):1067-1078. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18255. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
2
Heart health meets cognitive health: evidence on the role of blood pressure.心脏健康与认知健康:血压的作用证据。
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):854-867. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00248-9.
3
Trial of Intensive Blood-Pressure Control in Older Patients with Hypertension.
老年高血压患者强化血压控制试验。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 30;385(14):1268-1279. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111437. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
4
Final Report of a Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的试验最终报告。
N Engl J Med. 2021 May 20;384(20):1921-1930. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1901281.
5
Effects of intensive versus standard blood pressure control on domain-specific cognitive function: a substudy of the SPRINT randomised controlled trial.强化与标准血压控制对特定领域认知功能的影响:SPRINT 随机对照试验的子研究。
Lancet Neurol. 2020 Nov;19(11):899-907. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(20)30319-7.
6
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission.《痴呆症的预防、干预与照护:柳叶刀委员会2020年报告》
Lancet. 2020 Aug 8;396(10248):413-446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
7
Cardiovascular risk factors and accelerated cognitive decline in midlife: The CARDIA Study.中年时期心血管危险因素与认知能力加速衰退:CARDIA 研究。
Neurology. 2020 Aug 18;95(7):e839-e846. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010078. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
8
Association of Blood Pressure Lowering With Incident Dementia or Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.降压治疗与新发痴呆或认知障碍的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA. 2020 May 19;323(19):1934-1944. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.4249.
9
2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines.2020年国际高血压学会全球高血压实践指南
Hypertension. 2020 Jun;75(6):1334-1357. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.15026. Epub 2020 May 6.
10
Changes in Cognitive Function and Risk Factors for Cognitive Impairment of the Elderly in China: 2005-2014.中国老年人认知功能变化及认知障碍的危险因素:2005-2014 年。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Aug 9;16(16):2847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16162847.