Radboud university medical center, Donders Institute for Brain Cognition and Behaviour, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Radboudumc Alzheimer Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands (A.E.v.R., B.C.S., M.L.S., J.A.H.R.C., R.A.A.d.H.).
Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, United Kingdom (L.C.B.).
Hypertension. 2022 May;79(5):1067-1078. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.121.18255. Epub 2022 Feb 23.
In older age, the benefits of antihypertensive treatment (AHT) become less evident, with greater associated risk. Of particular concern is compromising cerebral blood flow (CBF), especially in those with cognitive impairment.
We created a synthesis of the published evidence by searching multiple electronic databases from 1970 to May 2021. Included studies had participants with mean age ≥50 years, hypertension or cognitive impairment, and assessed CBF before and after initiating AHT. Two authors independently determined eligibility and extracted data. Study quality was assessed using The Risk of Bias in Nonrandomized Studies of Interventions tool. We summarized study characteristics (qualitative synthesis) and performed random-effects meta-analyses (quantitative synthesis).
Thirty-two studies (total n=1306) were included, of which 23 were eligible for meta-analysis. In line with the qualitative synthesis, the meta-analysis indicated no effect of AHT initiation on CBF (standardized mean difference, 0.08 [95% CI, -0.07 to 0.22]; =0.31, =42%). This was consistent across subgroups of acute versus chronic AHT, drug class, study design, and CBF measurement. Subgroups by age demonstrated an increase in CBF after AHT in those aged >70 years (standardized mean difference, 4.15 [95% CI, 0.16-8.15]; =0.04, =42%), but not in those aged 50 to 65 and 65 to 70 years (standardized mean difference, 0.18 [95% CI,-2.02 to 2.38]; =0.87, =49%; standardized mean difference, 1.22 [95% CI, -0.45 to 2.88]; =0.15, =68%). Overall, risk of bias was moderate-to-high and quality of evidence (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was very low, reflecting the observational nature of the data.
Accepting the observed limitations, current evidence does not suggest a harmful effect of AHT on CBF. Concerns over CBF should not preclude treatment of hypertension.
在老年人群中,降压治疗(AHT)的益处变得不那么明显,且相关风险更大。特别令人关注的是会影响脑血流(CBF),尤其是在有认知障碍的人群中。
我们通过检索从 1970 年到 2021 年 5 月的多个电子数据库,对已发表的证据进行了综合分析。纳入的研究对象平均年龄≥50 岁,患有高血压或认知障碍,并在开始 AHT 前后评估 CBF。两位作者独立确定纳入标准并提取数据。使用非随机干预研究的偏倚风险工具评估研究质量。我们总结了研究特征(定性综合)并进行了随机效应荟萃分析(定量综合)。
共纳入 32 项研究(总计 1306 名参与者),其中 23 项研究适合进行荟萃分析。与定性综合一致,荟萃分析表明 AHT 启动对 CBF 没有影响(标准化均数差,0.08[95%CI,-0.07 至 0.22];=0.31,=42%)。这在急性与慢性 AHT、药物类别、研究设计和 CBF 测量的亚组中是一致的。按年龄分组的亚组显示,在年龄>70 岁的人群中,AHT 后 CBF 增加(标准化均数差,4.15[95%CI,0.16-8.15];=0.04,=42%),但在年龄 50-65 岁和 65-70 岁的人群中则没有(标准化均数差,0.18[95%CI,-2.02 至 2.38];=0.87,=49%;标准化均数差,1.22[95%CI,-0.45 至 2.88];=0.15,=68%)。总体而言,偏倚风险为中高度,证据质量(推荐评估、制定和评估分级)为极低,反映了数据的观察性质。
鉴于观察到的局限性,目前的证据表明 AHT 对 CBF 没有有害影响。对 CBF 的担忧不应阻止高血压的治疗。