Burkhard Marco D, Spirig José M, Wanivenhaus Florian, Cornaz Frédéric, Fasser Marie-Rosa, Widmer Jonas, Farshad Mazda
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Institute for Biomechanics, Balgrist Campus, ETH Zurich, Lengghalde 5, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur Spine J. 2023 Apr;32(4):1411-1420. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07597-5. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
To elucidate residual motion of cortical screw (CS) and pedicle screw (PS) constructs with unilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion (ul-PLIF), bilateral PLIF (bl-PLIF), facet-sparing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (fs-TLIF), and facet-resecting TLIF (fr-TLIF).
A total of 35 human cadaver lumbar segments were instrumented with PS (n = 18) and CS (n = 17). Range of motion (ROM) and relative ROM changes were recorded in flexion/extension (FE), lateral bending (LB), axial rotation (AR), lateral shear (LS), anterior shear (AS), and axial compression (AC) in five instrumentational states: without interbody fusion (wo-IF), ul-PLIF, bl-PLIF, fs-TLIF, and fr-TLIF.
Whereas FE, LB, AR, and AC noticeably differed between the instrumentational states, AS and LS were less prominently affected. Compared to wo-IF, ul-PLIF caused a significant increase in ROM with PS (FE + 42%, LB + 24%, AR + 34%, and AC + 77%), however, such changes were non-significant with CS. ROM was similar between wo-IF and all other interbody fusion techniques. Insertion of a second PLIF (bl-PLIF) significantly decreased ROM with CS (FE -17%, LB -26%, AR -20%, AC -51%) and PS (FE - 23%, LB - 14%, AR - 20%, AC - 45%,). Facet removal in TLIF significantly increased ROM with CS (FE + 6%, LB + 9%, AR + 17%, AC of + 23%) and PS (FE + 7%, AR + 12%, AC + 13%).
bl-PLIF and TLIF show similarly low residual motion in both PS and CS constructs, but ul-PLIF results in increased motion. The fs-TLIF technique is able to further decrease motion compared to fr-TLIF in both the CS and PS constructs.
阐明单侧后路腰椎椎间融合术(ul-PLIF)、双侧PLIF(bl-PLIF)、保留小关节的经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(fs-TLIF)和切除小关节的TLIF(fr-TLIF)中皮质骨螺钉(CS)和椎弓根螺钉(PS)固定结构的残余运动情况。
对35个尸体腰椎节段分别使用PS(n = 18)和CS(n = 17)进行固定。记录在五种固定状态下的屈伸(FE)、侧屈(LB)、轴向旋转(AR)、侧方剪切(LS)、前方剪切(AS)和轴向压缩(AC)的活动范围(ROM)及相对ROM变化,这五种固定状态分别为:未进行椎间融合(wo-IF)、ul-PLIF、bl-PLIF、fs-TLIF和fr-TLIF。
虽然FE、LB、AR和AC在不同固定状态之间存在显著差异,但AS和LS受影响较小。与wo-IF相比,ul-PLIF使PS固定时的ROM显著增加(FE增加42%,LB增加24%,AR增加34%,AC增加77%),然而,CS固定时的此类变化不显著。wo-IF与所有其他椎间融合技术之间的ROM相似。进行第二次PLIF(bl-PLIF)显著降低了CS(FE降低17%,LB降低26%,AR降低20%,AC降低51%)和PS(FE降低23%,LB降低14%,AR降低20%,AC降低45%)的ROM。TLIF中切除小关节显著增加了CS(FE增加6%,LB增加9%,AR增加17%,AC增加23%)和PS(FE增加7%,AR增加12%,AC增加13%)的ROM。
bl-PLIF和TLIF在PS和CS固定结构中均显示出相似的低残余运动,但ul-PLIF会导致运动增加。在CS和PS固定结构中,与fr-TLIF相比,fs-TLIF技术能够进一步减少运动。