Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Libraries and School of Information Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Adv Nutr. 2023 Mar;14(2):215-237. doi: 10.1016/j.advnut.2022.10.005. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
Emerging research indicates the importance of gut microbiota in mediating the relationship between meat intake and human health outcomes. We aimed to assess the state of available scientific literature on meat intake and gut microbiota in humans (PROSPERO, International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews, CRD42020135649). We first conducted a scoping review to identify observational and interventional studies on this topic. Searches were performed for English language articles using PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and CINAHL (Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) databases from inception to August 2021 and using keywords related to meat (inclusive of mammalian, avian, and aquatic subtypes) and gut microbiota. Of 14,680 records, 85 eligible articles were included in the scoping review, comprising 57 observational and 28 interventional studies. One prospective observational study and 13 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in adults without diagnosed disease. We included the 13 RCTs, comprising 18 comparisons, in the systematic review to assess the effects of higher and lower intakes of total meat and meat subtypes on the gut microbiota composition. The bacterial composition was differentially affected by consuming diets with and without meat or with varied meat subtypes. For example, higher meat intake tended to decrease population sizes of genera Anerostipes and Faecalibacterium, but it increased the population size of Roseburia across studies. However, the magnitude and directionality of most microbial responses varied, with inconsistent patterns of responses across studies. The data were insufficient for comparison within or between meat subtypes. The paucity of research, especially among meat subtypes, and heterogeneity of findings underscore the need for more well-designed prospective studies and full-feeding RCTs to address the relationships between and effects of consuming total meat and meat subtypes on gut microbiota, respectively.
新兴研究表明,肠道微生物群在介导肉类摄入量与人类健康结果之间的关系方面具有重要作用。我们旨在评估关于人类肉类摄入量和肠道微生物群的现有科学文献状况(PROSPERO,国际前瞻性系统评价注册库,CRD42020135649)。我们首先进行了范围界定审查,以确定关于该主题的观察性和干预性研究。从 2021 年 8 月开始,使用 PubMed、Cochrane 图书馆、Scopus 和 CINAHL(护理与联合健康文献累积索引)数据库,使用与肉类(包括哺乳动物、禽类和水生亚类)和肠道微生物群相关的关键词,对英文文章进行了检索。在 14680 条记录中,有 85 篇符合条件的文章被纳入范围界定审查,其中包括 57 篇观察性研究和 28 篇干预性研究。在没有诊断出疾病的成年人中,确定了一项前瞻性观察性研究和 13 项随机对照试验(RCT)。我们将 13 项 RCT 纳入系统评价,共包含 18 项比较,以评估总肉类和肉类亚类摄入量较高和较低对肠道微生物群组成的影响。通过食用含肉和不含肉或不同肉类亚类的饮食,细菌组成受到不同的影响。例如,较高的肉类摄入量往往会降低属 Anerostipes 和 Faecalibacterium 的种群规模,但会增加 Roseburia 在研究中的种群规模。然而,大多数微生物反应的幅度和方向性有所不同,研究之间的反应模式不一致。数据不足以进行肉类亚类之间或内部的比较。研究的缺乏,尤其是在肉类亚类方面,以及研究结果的异质性,强调需要更多设计良好的前瞻性研究和全喂养 RCT,以分别解决总肉类和肉类亚类的摄入与肠道微生物群之间的关系以及摄入对肠道微生物群的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1
Crit Rev Toxicol. 2024-9
Hum Reprod Update. 2024-5-2
NPJ Sci Food. 2024-8-7
Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2021-10
Front Neurol. 2021-9-24
Microbiome. 2021-5-18
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2020-8-17