Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, 72 East Concord Street, C-8, Boston, MA, 02118, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2023 Aug;30(4):1414-1419. doi: 10.1007/s12350-023-03203-9. Epub 2023 Feb 23.
The optimal heart-to-contralateral chest (H/CL) ratio threshold for non-invasive diagnosis of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CA) using Tc pyrophosphate (PYP) imaging in a population with low pretest probability is not known.
Using myocardial PYP retention by SPECT as the reference standard, we evaluated the diagnostic performance of different semi-quantitative and quantitative (H/CL chest ratio) planar parameters obtained from 3-hour PYP imaging in a prospectively recruited cohort of minority older adults with heart failure and increased LV wall thickness.
Of 229 patients, 14 were found to have ATTR-CA (6.1%). No PYP uptake (grade 0) was observed in 77% of scans, all grade 3 scans were ATTR-CA, and only 4 of 11 (36%) grade 2 scans were ATTR-CA. An H/CL threshold of ≥ 1.4 maximized specificity (99%) and positive predictive value (93%) but resulted in decreased sensitivity (93%), compared to the ≥ 1.3 threshold which had 100% sensitivity.
Among patients with a low pretest likelihood of ATTR-CA, planar interpretation, while useful to exclude disease, must be interpreted with caution. H/CL ratio threshold of ≥ 1.3 resulted in clinically important misclassifications. These data suggest that quantitative planar imaging thresholds may not be appropriate to apply in low pretest likelihood populations being evaluated for ATTR-CA.
使用 Tc 焦磷酸盐(PYP)成像对低术前概率人群进行转甲状腺素蛋白心脏淀粉样变性(ATTR-CA)的无创诊断时,最佳的心脏与对侧胸部(H/CL)比值阈值尚不清楚。
我们使用 SPECT 心肌 PYP 保留作为参考标准,评估了 3 小时 PYP 成像中不同半定量和定量(H/CL 胸部比值)平面参数在具有心力衰竭和左心室壁增厚增加的少数族裔老年患者前瞻性招募队列中的诊断性能。
在 229 名患者中,发现 14 名患有 ATTR-CA(6.1%)。77%的扫描未见 PYP 摄取(等级 0),所有等级 3 的扫描均为 ATTR-CA,而仅 11 个等级 2 的扫描中的 4 个(36%)为 ATTR-CA。H/CL 阈值≥1.4 可最大程度提高特异性(99%)和阳性预测值(93%),但敏感性降低(93%),而阈值≥1.3 具有 100%的敏感性。
在术前 ATTR-CA 可能性较低的患者中,平面解释虽然有助于排除疾病,但必须谨慎解释。H/CL 比值阈值≥1.3 会导致临床上重要的错误分类。这些数据表明,定量平面成像阈值可能不适用于评估 ATTR-CA 的低术前可能性人群。