• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Diagnostic Accuracy of Perception Threshold Tracking in the Detection of Small Fiber Damage in Type 1 Diabetes.知觉阈跟踪在 1 型糖尿病小纤维损伤检测中的诊断准确性。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1157-1164. doi: 10.1177/19322968231157431. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
2
Corneal confocal microscopy as a non-invasive test to assess diabetic peripheral neuropathy.角膜共焦显微镜作为一种非侵入性测试,用于评估糖尿病周围神经病变。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018 Feb;136:85-92. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2017.11.026. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
3
The Inferior Whorl For Detecting Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy Using Corneal Confocal Microscopy.用于通过角膜共焦显微镜检测糖尿病周围神经病变的下旋轮。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Apr;56(4):2498-504. doi: 10.1167/iovs.14-15919.
4
Corneal confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.角膜共焦显微镜在糖尿病周围神经病变诊断中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Diabetes Investig. 2022 Jan;13(1):134-147. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13643. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
5
Quantitative analysis of corneal nerve fibers in type 2 diabetics with and without diabetic peripheral neuropathy: Comparison of manual and automated assessments.2 型糖尿病伴与不伴糖尿病周围神经病变患者角膜神经纤维的定量分析:手动评估与自动评估的比较。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 May;151:33-38. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.03.039. Epub 2019 Mar 30.
6
Association of corneal nerve loss with markers of axonal ion channel dysfunction in type 1 diabetes.1 型糖尿病患者角膜神经丢失与轴突离子通道功能障碍标志物的关系。
Clin Neurophysiol. 2020 Jan;131(1):145-154. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.09.029. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
7
Rapid automated diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy with in vivo corneal confocal microscopy.利用体内角膜共聚焦显微镜快速自动诊断糖尿病周围神经病变。
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014 Apr 3;55(4):2071-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13787.
8
Corneal confocal microscopy: A useful tool for diagnosis of small fiber neuropathy in type 2 diabetes.角膜共焦显微镜:诊断 2 型糖尿病小纤维神经病的有用工具。
J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Dec;12(12):2183-2189. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13616. Epub 2021 Jul 17.
9
Corneal confocal microscopy identifies small fibre damage and progression of diabetic neuropathy.角膜共焦显微镜可识别小纤维损伤和糖尿病神经病变的进展。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 21;11(1):1859. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81302-8.
10
Corneal confocal microscopy predicts 4-year incident peripheral neuropathy in type 1 diabetes.角膜共焦显微镜可预测 1 型糖尿病患者 4 年内发生周围神经病变。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Apr;38(4):671-5. doi: 10.2337/dc14-2114. Epub 2015 Jan 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Methods for the evaluation of corneal nerve fibres in diabetes mellitus by in vivo confocal microscopy: a scoping review.通过体内共聚焦显微镜评估糖尿病患者角膜神经纤维的方法:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 4;15(9):e098294. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-098294.
2
Corneal Nerve Morphology in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Meta-Analysis of In Vivo Confocal Microscopy Studies.疼痛性糖尿病神经病变中的角膜神经形态学:一项共聚焦显微镜活体研究的荟萃分析
Biomedicines. 2025 Jul 8;13(7):1675. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13071675.
3
Bibliometric Analysis: Insights Into the Podiatric Medicine Landscape of Diabetic Sensory Peripheral Neuropathy and Genomics.文献计量分析:洞察糖尿病感觉性周围神经病变与基因组学的足病医学领域
J Foot Ankle Res. 2025 Sep;18(3):e70062. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70062.
4
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: Emerging Treatments of Neuropathic Pain and Novel Diagnostic Methods.糖尿病性周围神经病变:神经性疼痛的新兴治疗方法及新型诊断方法
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep 16:19322968241279553. doi: 10.1177/19322968241279553.

本文引用的文献

1
Perception threshold tracking: validating a novel method for assessing function of large and small sensory nerve fibers in diabetic peripheral neuropathy with and without pain.感觉阈值追踪:验证一种评估伴有或不伴有疼痛的糖尿病周围神经病变中大小感觉神经纤维功能的新方法。
Pain. 2023 Apr 1;164(4):886-894. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002780. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
2
Gray Matter Brain Alterations in Type 1 Diabetes - Findings Based on Detailed Phenotyping of Neuropathy Status.1 型糖尿病的灰质脑改变 - 基于神经病变状态详细表型的研究结果。
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes. 2022 Nov;130(11):730-739. doi: 10.1055/a-1835-1877. Epub 2022 Jun 3.
3
Axonal Excitability Does Not Differ between Painful and Painless Diabetic or Chemotherapy-Induced Distal Symmetrical Polyneuropathy in a Multicenter Observational Study.多中心观察性研究显示,在伴有或不伴有疼痛的糖尿病性或化疗诱导的远端对称性多发性神经病中,轴突兴奋性没有差异。
Ann Neurol. 2022 Apr;91(4):506-520. doi: 10.1002/ana.26319. Epub 2022 Mar 7.
4
Review of techniques useful for the assessment of sensory small fiber neuropathies: Report from an IFCN expert group.用于评估感觉性小纤维神经病变的有用技术综述:国际临床神经生理联合会(IFCN)专家组报告
Clin Neurophysiol. 2022 Apr;136:13-38. doi: 10.1016/j.clinph.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
5
The Histamine-Induced Axon-Reflex Response in People With Type 1 Diabetes With and Without Peripheral Neuropathy and Pain: A Clinical, Observational Study.1 型糖尿病伴或不伴周围神经病变和疼痛患者的组胺诱导的轴突反射反应:一项临床观察研究。
J Pain. 2022 Jul;23(7):1167-1176. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2022.01.002. Epub 2022 Feb 2.
6
Incidence, hospitalization and mortality and their changes over time in people with a first ever diabetic foot ulcer.首次发生糖尿病足溃疡患者的发病率、住院率、死亡率及其随时间的变化。
Diabet Med. 2022 Apr;39(4):e14725. doi: 10.1111/dme.14725. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
7
Corneal nerve loss is related to the severity of painful diabetic neuropathy.角膜神经损失与疼痛性糖尿病神经病变的严重程度有关。
Eur J Neurol. 2022 Jan;29(1):286-294. doi: 10.1111/ene.15129. Epub 2021 Oct 13.
8
Novel and Emerging Electrophysiological Biomarkers of Diabetic Neuropathy and Painful Diabetic Neuropathy.新型和新兴的糖尿病神经病变和痛性糖尿病神经病变电生理生物标志物。
Clin Ther. 2021 Sep;43(9):1441-1456. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2021.03.020. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
9
Peripheral Neuropathy and All-Cause and Cardiovascular Mortality in U.S. Adults : A Prospective Cohort Study.美国成年人外周神经病变与全因和心血管死亡率:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Feb;174(2):167-174. doi: 10.7326/M20-1340. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
10
Idiopathic distal sensory polyneuropathy: ACTTION diagnostic criteria.特发性远端感觉性多发性神经病:ACTTION 诊断标准。
Neurology. 2020 Dec 1;95(22):1005-1014. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010988. Epub 2020 Oct 14.

知觉阈跟踪在 1 型糖尿病小纤维损伤检测中的诊断准确性。

Diagnostic Accuracy of Perception Threshold Tracking in the Detection of Small Fiber Damage in Type 1 Diabetes.

机构信息

Steno Diabetes Center North Denmark, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Department of Health Science and Technology, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.

出版信息

J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Sep;18(5):1157-1164. doi: 10.1177/19322968231157431. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1177/19322968231157431
PMID:36825610
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11418516/
Abstract

AIM

An objective assessment of small nerve fibers is key to the early detection of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). This study investigates the diagnostic accuracy of a novel perception threshold tracking technique in detecting small nerve fiber damage.

METHODS

Participants with type 1 diabetes (T1DM) without DPN (n = 20), with DPN (n = 20), with painful DPN (n = 20) and 20 healthy controls (HCs) underwent perception threshold tracking on the foot and corneal confocal microscopy. Diagnostic accuracy of perception threshold tracking compared to corneal confocal microscopy was analyzed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The rheobase, corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD), corneal nerve branch density (CNBD), and corneal nerve fiber length (CNFL) (all < .001) differed between groups. The diagnostic accuracy of perception threshold tracking (rheobase) was excellent for identifying small nerve fiber damage, especially for CNFL with a sensitivity of 94%, specificity 94%, positive predictive value 97%, and negative predictive value 89%. There was a significant correlation between rheobase with CNFD, CNBD, CNFL, and Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (all < .001).

CONCLUSION

Perception threshold tracking had a very high diagnostic agreement with corneal confocal microscopy for detecting small nerve fiber loss and may have clinical utility for assessing small nerve fiber damage and hence early DPN.

CLINICAL TRIALS

NCT04078516.

摘要

目的

对小神经纤维进行客观评估是早期发现糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的关键。本研究探讨了一种新型感知阈跟踪技术在检测小神经纤维损伤方面的诊断准确性。

方法

本研究纳入了 20 名无 DPN 的 1 型糖尿病(T1DM)患者、20 名有 DPN 的患者、20 名有痛性 DPN 的患者和 20 名健康对照者(HCs),对足部和角膜共焦显微镜进行了感知阈跟踪检查。使用逻辑回归分析感知阈跟踪与角膜共焦显微镜比较的诊断准确性。

结果

各组间的阈值(rheobase)、角膜神经纤维密度(CNFD)、角膜神经分支密度(CNBD)和角膜神经纤维长度(CNFL)均有显著差异(均<0.001)。感知阈跟踪(阈值)对识别小神经纤维损伤的诊断准确性非常高,尤其是对 CNFL 的敏感性为 94%,特异性为 94%,阳性预测值为 97%,阴性预测值为 89%。阈值与 CNFD、CNBD、CNFL 和密歇根神经病变筛查工具(均<0.001)之间存在显著相关性。

结论

感知阈跟踪与角膜共焦显微镜在检测小神经纤维损失方面具有非常高的诊断一致性,可能对评估小神经纤维损伤和早期 DPN 具有临床应用价值。

临床试验

NCT04078516。