Kondov Stoyan, Bothe Dominique, Beyersdorf Friedhelm, Czerny Martin, Harloff Andreas, Pooth Jan-Steffen, Kaier Klaus, Schöllhorn Joachim, Kreibich Maximilian, Siepe Matthias, Rylski Bartosz
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Department of Neurology and Neurophysiology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Feb 6;36(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad005.
The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of routine shunting to near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS)-guided shunting in patients undergoing eversion endarterectomy (EEA) under general anaesthesia.
We retrospectively evaluated data of all patients undergoing EEA of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in our department from January 2011 until January 2019. Included were patients with EEA of the ICA and the patients were divided into 2 groups: selective-shunting group and routine-shunting group. Patients (i) with patch angioplasty during the surgery, (ii) undergoing surgery for restenosis and (ii) stenosis after radiation therapy, (iii) without recorded regional cerebral oxygen saturation trends, (iv) presenting with an emergency treatment indication and (v) operated upon by residents were excluded. In all patients, EEA was performed in general anaesthesia and under NIRS monitoring. One-to-one propensity score matching was used to compare EEA outcomes after routine shunting to NIRS-guided shunting. Primary end points were defined as perioperative stroke and in-hospital mortality after EEA.
Routine and NIRS-guided selective shunting were applied in 340 (34.0%) and 661 (66.0%) patients, respectively. A total of 277 pairs were generated via propensity score matching. Fifty-eight (20.1%) from the selective-shunting group were intraoperatively shunted. Concomitant procedures were more frequently performed in the routine-shunting group [170 (61.4%) vs 47 (17.0%), 180 (65%) vs 101 (36.5%), and 60 (21.7%) vs 6 (2.2%), P < 0.001]. The perioperative stroke rate in the routine-shunting group was higher as well [11 (4.0%) vs 3 (1.1%), P = 0.022]. In-hospital death was overall 0.2% (n = 1). Multivariable logistic regression in the matched patient indicated age (odds ratio 1.050, 95% confidence interval 1.002-1.104, P = 0.046) and routine shunting (odds ratio 2.788, confidence interval 1.119-7.428, P = 0.032) as risk factors for perioperative stroke during EEA of the ICA.
We found that, during EEA of the ICA, under general anaesthesia, NIRS-guided selective shunting was associated with a lower incidence of perioperative stroke than routine shunting.
本研究旨在比较全身麻醉下行颈动脉内膜外翻剥脱术(EEA)患者常规分流与近红外光谱(NIRS)引导分流的效果。
我们回顾性评估了2011年1月至2019年1月在我科接受颈内动脉(ICA)EEA的所有患者的数据。纳入的患者为接受ICA的EEA患者,并分为2组:选择性分流组和常规分流组。排除标准为:(i)手术期间进行补片血管成形术的患者;(ii)接受再狭窄手术和放疗后狭窄手术的患者;(iii)未记录局部脑氧饱和度趋势的患者;(iv)有急诊治疗指征的患者;(v)由住院医师进行手术的患者。所有患者均在全身麻醉和NIRS监测下进行EEA。采用一对一倾向评分匹配法比较常规分流与NIRS引导分流后的EEA效果。主要终点定义为EEA术后围手术期卒中及住院死亡率。
分别有340例(34.0%)和661例(66.0%)患者接受了常规和NIRS引导的选择性分流。通过倾向评分匹配共产生277对。选择性分流组中有58例(20.1%)在术中进行了分流。常规分流组更频繁地进行了伴随手术[170例(61.4%)对47例(17.0%),180例(65%)对101例(36.5%),60例(21.7%)对6例(2.2%),P<0.001]。常规分流组的围手术期卒中发生率也更高[11例(4.0%)对3例(1.1%),P = 0.022]。住院死亡率总体为0.2%(n = 1)。匹配患者的多变量逻辑回归显示,年龄(比值比1.050,95%置信区间1.002 - 1.104,P = 0.046)和常规分流(比值比2.788,置信区间1.119 - 7.428,P = 0.032)是ICA的EEA围手术期卒中的危险因素。
我们发现,在全身麻醉下进行ICA的EEA时,NIRS引导的选择性分流与常规分流相比,围手术期卒中发生率较低。