• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术:简要综述

Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy : A Short Review.

作者信息

Davidovic Lazar B, Tomic Ivan Z

机构信息

School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.

Clinic for Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020 May;63(3):373-379. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2019.0201. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

DOI:10.3340/jkns.2019.0201
PMID:32114754
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7218199/
Abstract

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is the main procedure in carotid surgery, as well as the most frequent vascular procedure. Two techniques of CEA are available : eversion and conventional plus patch angioplasty. Eversion CEA is anatomic procedure that reduces ischemic and total operative time. Simultaneous correction of the joined carotid kinking and coiling is possible, easy and safe, while the usage of patch is excluded. Thanks to oblique shape of anastomosis, eversion CEA is associated with low risk of long-term restenosis. The false anastomotic aneurysms occurrence is very rare, almost impossible after eversion CEA. However, the usage of carotid shunt during eversion CEA is not always simple, while proximal or distal extension of the carotid plaque can make eversion CEA more difficult and risky. Eversion CEA should be the first choice in carotid surgery. Conventional CEA is indicated in cases when carotid plaque is extended more than usual, as well as, if the usage of carotid shunt is necessary.

摘要

颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)是颈动脉手术中的主要术式,也是最常见的血管手术。CEA有两种技术:外翻式和传统加补片血管成形术。外翻式CEA是一种解剖学术式,可减少缺血时间和总手术时间。同时矫正合并的颈动脉扭结和盘绕是可行的、简便且安全的,同时无需使用补片。由于吻合口呈斜形,外翻式CEA与长期再狭窄风险较低相关。假性吻合口动脉瘤的发生率非常低,外翻式CEA术后几乎不可能发生。然而,外翻式CEA术中使用颈动脉分流器并不总是简单的,而颈动脉斑块的近端或远端延伸会使外翻式CEA更困难且风险更高。外翻式CEA应是颈动脉手术的首选。传统CEA适用于颈动脉斑块延伸超过正常情况以及需要使用颈动脉分流器的病例。

相似文献

1
Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy : A Short Review.外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术:简要综述
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2020 May;63(3):373-379. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2019.0201. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
2
Durability of eversion carotid endarterectomy: comparison with primary closure and carotid patch angioplasty.外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术的耐久性:与一期缝合及颈动脉补片血管成形术的比较
J Vasc Surg. 2001 Sep;34(3):453-8. doi: 10.1067/mva.2001.117885.
3
Multicenter experience on eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: observations from the Stent-Protected Angioplasty Versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE-1) trial.多中心研究:外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术与传统颈动脉内膜切除术治疗症状性颈动脉狭窄的对比——来自支架保护血管成形术与颈动脉内膜切除术(SPACE-1)试验的观察。
Stroke. 2012 Jul;43(7):1865-71. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.640102. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
4
Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial.外翻式与传统颈动脉内膜切除术:一项前瞻性多中心随机试验的晚期结果
J Vasc Surg. 2000 Jan;31(1 Pt 1):19-30. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(00)70064-4.
5
[Long-term results conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy].[传统及外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术的长期结果]
Zh Nevrol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova. 2023;123(8. Vyp. 2):70-76. doi: 10.17116/jnevro202312308270.
6
Eversion vs conventional carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review.外翻式与传统颈动脉内膜切除术:一项系统评价
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002 Mar;23(3):195-201. doi: 10.1053/ejvs.2001.1560.
7
Eversion versus conventional endarterectomy.外翻术与传统动脉内膜切除术的对比
Semin Vasc Surg. 2004 Sep;17(3):236-42. doi: 10.1016/s0895-7967(04)00050-x.
8
A randomized study on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: study design and preliminary results: the Everest Trial.外翻与标准颈动脉内膜切除术的随机研究:研究设计与初步结果:珠穆朗玛峰试验
J Vasc Surg. 1998 Apr;27(4):595-605. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(98)70223-x.
9
[A comparative study on medium-long term results of conventional and eversion endarterectomy in management of carotid artery stenosis: a meta-analysis].[传统与外翻式动脉内膜切除术治疗颈动脉狭窄的中长期疗效比较研究:一项荟萃分析]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2014 Feb 25;94(7):510-6.
10
Hybrid treatment of tandem, common carotid/innominate artery and ipsilateral carotid bifurcation stenoses by simultaneous, retrograde proximal stenting and eversion carotid endarterectomy: Preliminary results of a case series.同期逆行近端支架置入术联合外翻颈动脉内膜切除术治疗串联、颈总/无名动脉及同侧颈动脉分叉狭窄的杂交治疗:病例系列的初步结果。
Int J Surg. 2018 Apr;52:329-333. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.062. Epub 2018 Mar 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Routine versus selective near-infrared spectroscopy-guided shunting during carotid eversion endarterectomy.颈动脉外翻内膜切除术中常规与选择性近红外光谱引导分流的比较。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2023 Feb 6;36(2). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivad005.
2
The Impact of Revascularization in a Patient with Atypical Manifestations of Hypoperfusion.血运重建对灌注不足不典型表现患者的影响。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Sep 22;58(10):1328. doi: 10.3390/medicina58101328.
3
Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy with Shunt versus Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy without Shunt does the Technique Influence the Outcome in Symptomatic Critical Carotid Stenosis.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of Eversion Carotid Endarterectomy and Patch Carotid Endarterectomy: A Retrospective Study of 6 Years of Experience.外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术与补丁式颈动脉内膜切除术的比较:6 年经验的回顾性研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2018 Aug 21;24:5820-5825. doi: 10.12659/MSM.907762.
2
Editor's Choice - An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Outcomes Following Eversion vs. Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in Randomised Controlled Trials and Observational Studies.编辑精选 - 外翻式与传统颈动脉内膜切除术治疗随机对照试验和观察性研究结果的更新系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Apr;55(4):465-473. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.12.025. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
3
带分流管的传统颈动脉内膜切除术与不带分流管的外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术:技术是否会影响有症状的严重颈动脉狭窄的治疗结果
Asian J Neurosurg. 2021 May 28;16(2):321-325. doi: 10.4103/ajns.AJNS_486_20. eCollection 2021 Apr-Jun.
Editor's Choice - Management of Atherosclerotic Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS).
编辑推荐——动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉和椎动脉疾病的管理:欧洲血管外科学会(ESVS)2017年临床实践指南
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;55(1):3-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2017.06.021. Epub 2017 Aug 26.
4
Female and obese patients might have higher risk from surgical repair of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.女性和肥胖患者可能在无症状性颈动脉狭窄手术修复中面临更高风险。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2015 Aug;29(6):1286-92. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2015.03.032. Epub 2015 May 22.
5
Incidence of and indications for conversion of cervical plexus block to general anesthesia in patients undergoing carotid surgery: a single center experience.颈动脉手术患者颈丛阻滞转为全身麻醉的发生率及指征:单中心经验
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2015 Jun;56(3):441-6. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
6
Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: a meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised studies.外翻式与传统颈动脉内膜切除术:随机和非随机研究的荟萃分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Dec;42(6):751-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.08.012. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
7
The addition of fentanyl to local anesthetics affects the quality and duration of cervical plexus block: a randomized, controlled trial.芬太尼加入局麻药会影响颈丛阻滞的质量和持续时间:一项随机对照试验。
Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):234-7. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e1e9ab. Epub 2010 Jun 2.
8
Single-center prospective, randomized analysis of conventional and eversion carotid endarterectomy.传统与外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术的单中心前瞻性随机分析。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2008 Oct;49(5):619-25.
9
Pain associated with carotid artery surgery performed under carotid plexus block: preemptive analgesic effect of ketorolac.在颈丛阻滞下进行颈动脉手术时的疼痛:酮咯酸的超前镇痛作用。
Vascular. 2006 Mar-Apr;14(2):75-80. doi: 10.2310/6670.2006.00013.
10
Comparison of standard carotid endarterectomy with Dacron patch angioplasty versus eversion carotid endarterectomy during a 4-year period.4年期间标准颈动脉内膜切除术联合涤纶补片血管成形术与外翻式颈动脉内膜切除术的比较。
Am Surg. 2004 Feb;70(2):181-5; discussion 185.