Suppr超能文献

人工智能在临床护理中的应用:基于价值的共享决策指南。

The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Care: A Values-Based Guide for Shared Decision Making.

机构信息

Department of Bioethics, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON M5G 1X5, Canada.

Joint Centre for Bioethics, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P8, Canada.

出版信息

Curr Oncol. 2023 Feb 9;30(2):2178-2186. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30020168.

Abstract

Clinical applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in healthcare, including in the field of oncology, have the potential to advance diagnosis and treatment. The literature suggests that patient values should be considered in decision making when using AI in clinical care; however, there is a lack of practical guidance for clinicians on how to approach these conversations and incorporate patient values into clinical decision making. We provide a practical, values-based guide for clinicians to assist in critical reflection and the incorporation of patient values into shared decision making when deciding to use AI in clinical care. Values that are relevant to patients, identified in the literature, include trust, privacy and confidentiality, non-maleficence, safety, accountability, beneficence, autonomy, transparency, compassion, equity, justice, and fairness. The guide offers questions for clinicians to consider when adopting the potential use of AI in their practice; explores illness understanding between the patient and clinician; encourages open dialogue of patient values; reviews all clinically appropriate options; and makes a shared decision of what option best meets the patient's values. The guide can be used for diverse clinical applications of AI.

摘要

人工智能(AI)在医疗保健中的临床应用,包括肿瘤学领域,有潜力推进诊断和治疗。文献表明,在临床护理中使用 AI 时,应考虑患者的价值观;然而,对于临床医生来说,缺乏如何进行这些对话并将患者价值观纳入临床决策制定的实际指导。我们为临床医生提供了一个实用的、基于价值观的指南,以帮助他们在决定将 AI 用于临床护理时进行批判性反思,并将患者价值观纳入共同决策制定。文献中确定的与患者相关的价值观包括信任、隐私和保密性、非伤害、安全、问责制、善行、自主性、透明度、同情、公平、正义和公平。该指南为临床医生提供了在实践中采用 AI 潜在用途时需要考虑的问题;探讨了患者和临床医生之间的疾病理解;鼓励开放对话患者价值观;审查所有临床适当的选择;并做出符合患者价值观的最佳选择的共同决策。该指南可用于人工智能的各种临床应用。

相似文献

2
Computer knows best? The need for value-flexibility in medical AI.计算机最懂?医疗 AI 需要价值灵活性。
J Med Ethics. 2019 Mar;45(3):156-160. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2018-105118. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
10
Call for the responsible artificial intelligence in the healthcare.呼吁在医疗保健中使用负责任的人工智能。
BMJ Health Care Inform. 2023 Dec 21;30(1):e100920. doi: 10.1136/bmjhci-2023-100920.

引用本文的文献

6
Acceptance of Digital Health Technologies in Palliative Care Patients.姑息治疗患者对数字健康技术的接受情况。
Palliat Med Rep. 2024 Jan 12;5(1):34-42. doi: 10.1089/pmr.2023.0062. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

3
Patients Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence in Diabetic Eye Screening.患者对糖尿病眼病筛查人工智能的看法。
Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2022 May 1;11(3):287-293. doi: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000525.
4
Machine learning and health need better values.机器学习与健康需要更好的价值观。
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Apr 22;5(1):51. doi: 10.1038/s41746-022-00595-9.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验