Letter to the Editor: There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.
作者信息
Riddle Daniel L, Dumenci Levent
机构信息
Departments of Physical Therapy, Orthopaedic Surgery and Rheumatology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
出版信息
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Apr 1;481(4):841-842. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002591. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Letter to the Editor: There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.致编辑的信：全膝关节置换术最小临床重要差异存在相当大的不一致性：一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Apr 1;481(4):841-842. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002591. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
2
Reply to the Letter to the Editor: There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.对致编辑信的回复：全膝关节置换术最小临床重要差异存在相当大的不一致性：一项系统评价
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Apr 1;481(4):843-844. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002592. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
3
CORR Insights®: There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.CORR见解®：全膝关节置换术最小临床重要差异存在相当大的不一致性：一项系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jan 1;481(1):81-83. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002492. Epub 2022 Nov 18.
4
What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?全膝关节置换术后 WOMAC 指数的最小临床重要差异是多少？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2005-2014. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000444.
5
Ultracongruent Designs Compared to Posterior-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Tibial Inserts-What Does the Evidence Tell Us? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.-Letter to Editor.
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Mar;39(3):e22-e23. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2023.08.083.
6
Letter to the editor concerning the article: "Total knee arthroplasty after lower extremity amputation: a review of 13 cases".致编辑的信，关于文章《下肢截肢后全膝关节置换术：13例病例回顾》
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Oct;29(10):2054-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Jun 17.
7
No Benefit of Computer-assisted TKA: 10-year Results of a Prospective Randomized Study.计算机辅助全膝关节置换术无益处：一项前瞻性随机研究的10年结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Jan;476(1):126-134. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000021.
8
Letter to the editor: early outcome of TKA with a medial pivot fixed-bearing prosthesis is worse than with a PFC mobile-bearing prosthesis.致编辑的信：采用内侧旋转中心固定平台假体的全膝关节置换术早期结果比采用PFC活动平台假体的更差。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Mar;467(3):855-6; author reply 857-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0675-8. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
9
Letter to the editor: editor's spotlight/take 5: Is single-stage revision according to a strict protocol effective in treatment of chronic knee arthroplasty infections.致编辑的信：编辑聚焦/快问快答：按照严格方案进行的单阶段翻修术治疗慢性膝关节置换感染是否有效。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015 Mar;473(3):1165-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-4118-4. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
10
A step-wise approach to revision TKA.全膝关节置换翻修的分步方法。
Orthopedics. 2005 Sep;28(9):999-1001. doi: 10.3928/0147-7447-20050901-43.
引用本文的文献
1
Performance of baseline quartile-stratified minimal clinically important difference estimates was superior to individual minimal clinically important difference estimates when compared with a gold standard comparator of important change.与重要变化的金标准对照物相比，基线四分位数分层的最小临床重要差异估计值的表现优于个体最小临床重要差异估计值。
Pain. 2025 Jun 1;166(6):1450-1456. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003492. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
本文引用的文献
1
The smallest worthwhile effect is superior to the MCID for estimating acceptable benefits of knee arthroplasty.在评估膝关节置换术的可接受获益时，最小的有价值效应优于最小临床重要差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Dec;152:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.10.019. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
2
Discordance Abounds in Minimum Clinically Important Differences in THA: A Systematic Review.THA 中的最小临床重要差异存在显著差异：系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Apr 1;481(4):702-714. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002434. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
3
There are Considerable Inconsistencies Among Minimum Clinically Important Differences in TKA: A Systematic Review.全膝关节置换术最小临床重要差异存在显著差异：系统评价。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2023 Jan 1;481(1):63-80. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000002440. Epub 2022 Oct 5.
4
Commentary on finding meaning in patient-reported outcome change scores: a seemingly unquenchable thirst for understanding.关于在患者报告的结局变化分数中寻找意义的评论：一种似乎无法满足的理解渴望。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022 Jun;30(6):768-771. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.03.006. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
5
Cross-validation of good versus poor self-reported outcome trajectory types following knee arthroplasty.膝关节置换术后自我报告结局轨迹类型良好与不良的交叉验证。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2022 Jan;30(1):61-68. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.09.004. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
6
A confirmatory factor analysis approach was found to accurately estimate the reliability of transition ratings.验证性因子分析方法被发现可以准确估计转变评分的可靠性。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Jan;141:36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.029. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
7
Disentangling contextual effects from musculoskeletal treatments.从肌肉骨骼治疗中梳理出背景效应。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2021 Mar;29(3):297-299. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
8
Classifications of good versus poor outcome following knee arthroplasty should not be defined using arbitrary criteria.膝关节置换术后良好与不良结果的分类不应使用任意标准来定义。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Sep 10;21(1):604. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03583-w.
9
Definitions of poor outcome after total knee arthroplasty: an inventory review.全膝关节置换术后不良结局的定义：文献回顾。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Jun 13;21(1):378. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03406-y.
10
A systematic review of estimates of the minimal clinically important difference and patient acceptable symptom state of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index in patients who underwent total hip and total knee replacement.全髋关节和全膝关节置换术后患者的 Western Ontario 和 McMaster 大学骨关节炎指数最小临床重要差异和患者可接受症状状态的系统评价。
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2019 Oct;27(10):1408-1419. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2019.05.002. Epub 2019 May 13.
Zotero 插件