• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

文化记忆与文化认同对农业遗产品牌价值的影响:一个有调节的中介模型

The Impact of Cultural Memory and Cultural Identity in the Brand Value of Agricultural Heritage: A Moderated Mediation Model.

作者信息

Zheng Qionge, Zhang Sunbowen, Liang Jingxuan, Chen Youcheng, Ye Weijiao

机构信息

Anxi College of Tea Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Quanzhou 350002, China.

College of Humanities & Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing 210095, China.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 17;13(2):79. doi: 10.3390/bs13020079.

DOI:10.3390/bs13020079
PMID:36829308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9952542/
Abstract

Improving the brand value of agricultural cultural heritage can promote the development of the local social economy. Meanwhile, cultural memory and brand value are inseparable. Therefore, this study took the Anxi Tieguanyin Tea Culture System as the research object, collected 679 questionnaires, adopted a structural equation model, and applied SPSS 26.0 and Amos 24.0 software (IBM; Armonk, NY, USA) to study the influence of agricultural heritage cultural memory on brand value. This study innovatively develops a scale of agricultural heritage cultural memory, enriches the outer edge of cultural memory theory research, broadens the vision of agricultural heritage research, and provides a useful reference for the inheritance of agricultural heritage and the promotion of brand value.

摘要

提升农业文化遗产的品牌价值能够促进当地社会经济的发展。同时,文化记忆与品牌价值密不可分。因此,本研究以安溪铁观音茶文化系统为研究对象,收集了679份问卷,采用结构方程模型,并运用SPSS 26.0和Amos 24.0软件(美国纽约州阿蒙克市IBM公司)来研究农业遗产文化记忆对品牌价值的影响。本研究创新性地开发了农业遗产文化记忆量表,丰富了文化记忆理论研究的外延,拓宽了农业遗产研究的视野,并为农业遗产的传承和品牌价值的提升提供了有益参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7aa/9952542/d89d550a83d6/behavsci-13-00079-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7aa/9952542/1eae5ee916b8/behavsci-13-00079-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7aa/9952542/67f2f0baff41/behavsci-13-00079-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7aa/9952542/d89d550a83d6/behavsci-13-00079-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7aa/9952542/1eae5ee916b8/behavsci-13-00079-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7aa/9952542/67f2f0baff41/behavsci-13-00079-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c7aa/9952542/d89d550a83d6/behavsci-13-00079-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
The Impact of Cultural Memory and Cultural Identity in the Brand Value of Agricultural Heritage: A Moderated Mediation Model.文化记忆与文化认同对农业遗产品牌价值的影响:一个有调节的中介模型
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Jan 17;13(2):79. doi: 10.3390/bs13020079.
2
The impact of the creative performance of agricultural heritage systems on tourists' cultural identity: A dual perspective of knowledge transfer and novelty perception.农业遗产系统的创造性表现对游客文化认同的影响:知识转移与新奇感知的双重视角
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 2;13:968820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.968820. eCollection 2022.
3
Livelihood and Food Security in the Context of Sustainable Agriculture: Evidence from Tea Agricultural Heritage Systems in China.可持续农业背景下的生计与粮食安全:来自中国茶农业遗产系统的证据
Foods. 2024 Jul 16;13(14):2238. doi: 10.3390/foods13142238.
4
Spatial characteristics and restructuring model of the agro-cultural heritage site in the context of culture and tourism integration.文化与旅游融合背景下农业文化遗产地的空间特征与重构模式
Heliyon. 2024 Apr 25;10(9):e30227. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e30227. eCollection 2024 May 15.
5
An empirical study on cultural identity measurement and its influence mechanism among heritage tourists.遗产游客文化认同测量及其影响机制的实证研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 20;13:1032672. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1032672. eCollection 2022.
6
Legacy of culture heritage building revitalization: place attachment and culture identity.文化遗产建筑振兴的遗产:场所依恋与文化认同。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jan 23;14:1314223. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1314223. eCollection 2023.
7
Can AI-generated art stimulate the sustainability of intangible cultural heritage? A quantitative research on cultural and creative products of New Year Prints generated by AI.人工智能生成的艺术能否促进非物质文化遗产的可持续发展?关于人工智能生成的年画文创产品的定量研究。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 27;9(10):e20477. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20477. eCollection 2023 Oct.
8
The Distribution Characteristics and Potential Risk Assessment of Lead in the Soil of Tieguanyin Tea Plantations in Anxi County, China.中国安溪县铁观音茶园土壤中铅的分布特征及潜在风险评估
Toxics. 2023 Dec 25;12(1):22. doi: 10.3390/toxics12010022.
9
Who Am I and Where Do I Belong? The Impact of Heritage Cultural Identity Salience on Immigrant Workers Acculturation Strategies.我是谁,我属于哪里?传统文化身份显著性对移民工人文化适应策略的影响。
J Int Migr Integr. 2023;24(2):793-815. doi: 10.1007/s12134-022-00978-7. Epub 2022 Aug 4.
10
Digital Protection and Development of Intangible Cultural Heritage Relying on High-Performance Computing.数字保护与高性能计算赋能的非物质文化遗产发展。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2022 Apr 13;2022:4955380. doi: 10.1155/2022/4955380. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Brands as Intentional Agents Framework: How Perceived Intentions and Ability Can Map Brand Perception.品牌作为意向性主体框架:感知意图与能力如何塑造品牌认知
J Consum Psychol. 2012 Apr;22(2). doi: 10.1016/j.jcps.2011.09.006.
2
Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.行为研究中的共同方法偏差:文献综述与建议补救措施
J Appl Psychol. 2003 Oct;88(5):879-903. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.