活髓牙与死髓牙的瓷贴面：一项回顾性临床评估
Porcelain Veneers in Vital vs. Non-Vital Teeth: A Retrospective Clinical Evaluation.
作者信息
Zarow Maciej, Hardan Louis, Szczeklik Katarzyna, Bourgi Rim, Cuevas-Suárez Carlos Enrique, Jakubowicz Natalia, Nicastro Marco, Devoto Walter, Dominiak Marzena, Pytko-Polończyk Jolanta, Bereziewicz Wioletta, Lukomska-Szymanska Monika
机构信息
"NZOZ SPS Dentist" Dental Clinic and Postgraduate Course Centre, 30-033 Cracow, Poland.
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut 1107 2180, Lebanon.
出版信息
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Jan 28;10(2):168. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10020168.
Nowadays, the ceramic veneer approach can be considered more predictable than direct composite veneer. To date, there is a lack of studies comparing the clinical performance of anterior veneers cemented on vital teeth (VT) and non-vital teeth (NVT). This longitudinal clinical study investigated the performance of ceramic veneers in VT or anterior NVT. A total of 55 patients were evaluated in the study. Two groups were defined based on the vitality status of the teeth (93 teeth-vital and 61 teeth-non-vital). The United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria were used to assess the clinical status. The data were evaluated statistically with the Mann-Whitney U test. All restorations were considered acceptable, and only one veneer in VT failed for the criteria of secondary caries. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the criteria evaluated ( ≤ 0.671). The ceramic veneers evaluated showed a satisfactory clinical performance both in VT and NVT.
如今，陶瓷贴面修复法相较于直接复合树脂贴面修复法，被认为更具可预测性。迄今为止，尚缺乏关于粘结在活髓牙（VT）和无髓牙（NVT）上的前牙贴面临床性能比较的研究。这项纵向临床研究调查了陶瓷贴面在活髓牙或前牙无髓牙上的性能。该研究共评估了55例患者。根据牙齿的活力状态分为两组（93颗活髓牙和61颗无髓牙）。采用美国公共卫生服务（USPHS）标准评估临床状况。数据采用曼-惠特尼U检验进行统计学评估。所有修复体均被认为可接受，仅1颗活髓牙上的贴面因继发龋标准而失败。在评估的任何标准中均无统计学显著差异（≤0.671）。所评估的陶瓷贴面在活髓牙和无髓牙上均显示出令人满意的临床性能。
Zotero 插件