Galyean Michael L, Hales Kristin E
Department of Veterinary Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Department of Animal and Food Sciences, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA.
Animals (Basel). 2023 Feb 20;13(4):758. doi: 10.3390/ani13040758.
Mitigation of greenhouse gases and decreasing nutrient excretion have become increasingly important goals for the beef cattle industry. Because feed intake is a major driver of enteric CH production and nutrient excretion, feeding management systems could be important mitigation tools. Programmed feeding uses net energy equations to determine the feed required to yield a specific rate of gain, whereas restricted feeding typically involves decreasing intake relative to the expected or observed ad libitum intake. In the context of growing/finishing systems typical of those in the United States and Western Canada, experimental results with programmed and restricted feeding have often shown decreased overall feed intake and increased gain efficiency relative to ad libitum feeding, but too much restriction can negatively affect harvest weight and associated carcass quality. Slick feed bunk management is a time-based restriction that limits day-to-day variation in feed deliveries, but the effects on intake and performance are not well defined. Simulations to estimate enteric CH emission and nitrogen excretion indicated that programmed feeding of a high-grain diet could appreciably decrease CH emissions and nitrogen excretion compared with traditional growing programs based on high-forage diets. For feedlot finishing, programming gain for a portion of the feeding period will decrease CH emission and N excretion only if cattle perform better than expected during the programmed phase or if compensatory growth occurs when cattle are transitioned to ad libitum feeding. Optimal approaches to implement programmed or restricted feeding that will yield increased efficiency should be the subject of future research in this area.
减少温室气体排放和降低养分排泄已成为肉牛产业日益重要的目标。由于采食量是肠道甲烷产生和养分排泄的主要驱动因素,饲养管理系统可能是重要的减排工具。程序化饲养使用净能方程来确定达到特定增重率所需的饲料量,而限饲通常是指相对于预期或观察到的自由采食量减少采食量。在美国和加拿大西部典型的生长/育肥系统中,程序化饲养和限饲的实验结果相对于自由采食往往显示出总体采食量下降和增重效率提高,但过度限饲会对出栏体重和相关胴体品质产生负面影响。光滑料槽管理是一种基于时间的限饲方式,它限制了每日饲料供应的变化,但对采食量和生产性能的影响尚不明确。估计肠道甲烷排放和氮排泄的模拟结果表明,与基于高粗饲料日粮的传统生长方案相比,高谷物日粮的程序化饲养可显著降低甲烷排放和氮排泄。对于育肥牛,仅当牛在程序化阶段的表现优于预期,或者当牛转为自由采食时发生补偿性生长时,在部分饲养期内设定增重程序才会减少甲烷排放和氮排泄。实现程序化或限饲以提高效率的最佳方法应是该领域未来研究的主题。