• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转诊至儿科急诊科:为何家长未到场?

Telephone Referral to a Paediatric Emergency Department: Why Do Parents Not Show Up?

作者信息

Freiermuth Mélanie, Newman Christopher J, Villoslada Judit

机构信息

Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Paediatric Neurology and Neurorehabilitation Unit, Lausanne University Hospital, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;10(2):179. doi: 10.3390/children10020179.

DOI:10.3390/children10020179
PMID:36832308
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9954649/
Abstract

Medical call centres can evaluate and refer patients to an emergency department (ED), a physician or provide guidance for self-care. Our aim was (1) to determine parental adherence to an ED orientation after being referred by the nurses of a call centre, (2) to observe how adherence varies according to children's characteristics and (3) to assess parents' reasons for non-adherence. This was a prospective cohort study set in the Lausanne agglomeration, Switzerland. From 1 February to 5 March 2022, paediatric calls (<16 years old) with an ED orientation were selected. Life-threatening emergencies were excluded. Parental adherence was then verified in the ED. All parents were contacted by telephone to respond to a questionnaire regarding their call. Parental adherence to the ED orientation was 75%. Adherence decreased significantly with increasing distance between the place the call originated and the ED. The child's age, sex and health complaints within calls had no effect on adherence. The three major reasons for non-adherence to telephone referral were: improvement in the child's condition (50.7%), parents' decision to go elsewhere (18.3%) and an appointment with a paediatrician (15.5%). Our results offer new perspectives to optimise the telephone assessment of paediatric patients and decrease barriers to adherence.

摘要

医疗呼叫中心可以对患者进行评估,并将其转诊至急诊科、医生处,或提供自我护理指导。我们的目的是:(1)确定家长在接到呼叫中心护士转诊后前往急诊科的依从性;(2)观察依从性如何根据儿童的特征而变化;(3)评估家长不依从的原因。这是一项在瑞士洛桑城市群开展的前瞻性队列研究。在2022年2月1日至3月5日期间,选取了具有转诊至急诊科倾向的儿科呼叫(针对16岁以下儿童)。危及生命的紧急情况被排除在外。随后在急诊科核实家长的依从性。通过电话联系所有家长,让他们回答一份关于此次呼叫的问卷。家长对转诊至急诊科倾向的依从率为75%。随着呼叫发起地与急诊科之间距离的增加,依从性显著下降。呼叫中儿童的年龄、性别和健康问题对依从性没有影响。不依从电话转诊的三大主要原因是:孩子病情好转(50.7%)、家长决定去其他地方(18.3%)以及预约了儿科医生(15.5%)。我们的研究结果为优化儿科患者的电话评估以及减少依从性障碍提供了新的视角。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e38/9954649/286e0138efe4/children-10-00179-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e38/9954649/0c99f2379724/children-10-00179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e38/9954649/e9b4ff61a49c/children-10-00179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e38/9954649/286e0138efe4/children-10-00179-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e38/9954649/0c99f2379724/children-10-00179-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e38/9954649/e9b4ff61a49c/children-10-00179-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e38/9954649/286e0138efe4/children-10-00179-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Telephone Referral to a Paediatric Emergency Department: Why Do Parents Not Show Up?转诊至儿科急诊科:为何家长未到场?
Children (Basel). 2023 Jan 18;10(2):179. doi: 10.3390/children10020179.
2
Factors Determining Parents' Decisions to Bring Their Children to the Pediatric Emergency Department for a Minor Illness.决定父母是否带孩子因小病前往儿科急诊的因素。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Aug 28;23:4141-4148. doi: 10.12659/msm.902639.
3
Compliance with telephone triage advice among adults aged 45 years and older: an Australian data linkage study.45岁及以上成年人对电话分诊建议的依从性:一项澳大利亚数据关联研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Aug 1;17(1):512. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2458-y.
4
After-hours paediatric telephone triage and advice: the Neuchâtel experience.非工作时间儿科电话分诊与咨询:纳沙泰尔的经验
Eur J Pediatr. 2005 Sep;164(9):568-72. doi: 10.1007/s00431-005-1687-y. Epub 2005 May 19.
5
Outcomes of children referred to an emergency department by an after-hours call center.由非工作时间呼叫中心转诊至急诊科的儿童的治疗结果。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2004 Jun;20(6):367-72. doi: 10.1097/01.pec.0000133610.42699.41.
6
"Triaging out" children with minor illnesses from an emergency department by a triage nurse: where do they go?分诊护士将患有轻症的儿童“分诊出去”离开急诊科:他们会去哪里?
J Emerg Nurs. 1995 Apr;21(2):102-8. doi: 10.1016/s0099-1767(05)80007-8.
7
Delivery of pediatric after-hours care by call centers: a multicenter study of parental perceptions and compliance.呼叫中心提供儿科非工作时间护理:一项关于家长认知与依从性的多中心研究
Pediatrics. 2001 Dec;108(6):E111. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.6.e111.
8
Use of a telenursing triage service by Victorian parents attending the emergency department for their child's lower urgency condition.维多利亚州的家长带着孩子因病情紧急程度较低前往急诊科时使用远程护理分诊服务的情况。
Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Dec;27(6):558-562. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12477. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
9
Self-reported adherence, management behavior, and barriers to care after an emergency department visit by inner city children with asthma.市中心区哮喘患儿急诊科就诊后的自我报告依从性、管理行为及就医障碍
Pediatrics. 1998 May;101(5):E8. doi: 10.1542/peds.101.5.e8.
10
Influence of social characteristics on use of paediatric emergency care in Sweden - a questionnaire based study.社会特征对瑞典儿童急诊护理使用情况的影响——一项基于问卷调查的研究
BMC Emerg Med. 2018 Dec 27;18(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12873-018-0210-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Quality indicators development and prioritisation for emergency medical call centres: a stakeholder consensus.制定和优先考虑紧急医疗呼叫中心的质量指标:利益相关者共识。
BMJ Open Qual. 2021 May;10(2). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2020-001176.
2
Validation of Dutch Obstetric Telephone Triage System: A Prospective Validation Study.荷兰产科电话分诊系统的验证:一项前瞻性验证研究。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021 May 10;14:1907-1915. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S306390. eCollection 2021.
3
Impact of a telephone triage service for non-critical emergencies in Switzerland: A cross-sectional study.
瑞士非危急紧急情况电话分诊服务的影响:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 2;16(4):e0249287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249287. eCollection 2021.
4
Assessing patient safety in a pediatric telemedicine setting: a multi-methods study.评估儿科远程医疗环境中的患者安全:一项多方法研究。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Apr 3;20(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1074-7.
5
How much centralization of critical care services in the era of telemedicine?在远程医疗时代,重症监护服务应集中到何种程度?
Crit Care. 2019 Dec 26;23(1):423. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2705-1.
6
Performance of triage systems in emergency care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.分诊系统在急诊护理中的应用效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 28;9(5):e026471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026471.
7
Potential role of Emergency Medical System call centres in epidemiological surveillance of seasonal influenza.急诊医疗系统呼叫中心在季节性流感流行病学监测中的潜在作用。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2019 Mar;27(1):64-67. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a4768.
8
Validity of the Manchester Triage System in emergency care: A prospective observational study.曼彻斯特分诊系统在急诊护理中的有效性:一项前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 2;12(2):e0170811. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170811. eCollection 2017.
9
Evaluation of an after-hours call center: are pediatric patients appropriately referred to the emergency department?非工作时间呼叫中心的评估:儿科患者是否被恰当转诊至急诊科?
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014 Nov;30(11):798-804. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000262.
10
Standard 6: age groups for pediatric trials.标准6:儿科试验的年龄组。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jun;129 Suppl 3:S153-60. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0055I.