Palchik N S, Dielman T E, Woolliscroft J O, Stross J K
Department of Postgraduate Medicine and Health Professions Education, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor 48109-0201.
Med Educ. 1987 Sep;21(5):441-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.1987.tb00393.x.
In an academic medical centre between 1980 and 1985, the attitudes, preferences and career goals of house officers in a primary medical care residency training programme were assessed at entry and at the end of each house officer year. Primary care trainees who went on to practise in a general medicine setting were compared to primary care trainees who subsequently received subspecialty training and also to traditional internal medicine trainees. House officers in the primary care programme generally maintained attitudes and preferences central to the practice of primary care, and scored significantly higher than traditional track house officers on attitudes and preferences compatible with the practice of medicine in a primary care setting. However, primary care house officers who later went into subspecialty training received scores similar to those of traditional track house officers on practice preferences relating to specialty care. There were no significant differences between primary care and traditional track house officers on standard measures of knowledge and clinical skill.
1980年至1985年间,在一所学术医疗中心,对参加基层医疗住院医师培训项目的住院医师在入职时以及每个住院医师年度结束时的态度、偏好和职业目标进行了评估。将继续从事普通内科医疗工作的基层医疗培训学员与随后接受专科培训的基层医疗培训学员以及传统内科培训学员进行了比较。基层医疗项目的住院医师总体上保持着基层医疗实践核心的态度和偏好,并且在与基层医疗环境中的医疗实践相符的态度和偏好方面,得分显著高于传统路径的住院医师。然而,后来参加专科培训的基层医疗住院医师在与专科护理相关的实践偏好方面的得分与传统路径的住院医师相似。在知识和临床技能的标准衡量方面,基层医疗和传统路径的住院医师之间没有显著差异。