Goldenberg D L, Pozen J T, Cohen A S
Ann Intern Med. 1979 Aug;91(2):271-4. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-91-2-271.
There has been no evidence that primary-care pathways, a recent innovation in internal medicine residency programs, have affected the career choices of their trainees. We report the experience of the first four cohorts of primary-care trainees in internal medicine compared with traditional-pathway trainees at Boston City Hospital. Primary-care residents remained committed to their plans for a career in general internal medicine throughout training. In contrast, two thirds of the traditionally trained residents who were planning a career in general internal medicine at the beginning of their training changed their plans to subspecialty medicine. Thus, the primary-care pathway reinforced the career plans of trainees in general internal medicine, whereas traditional training influenced potential generalists toward subspecialty medicine.
尚无证据表明内科住院医师培训项目中近期出现的初级保健路径会影响其学员的职业选择。我们报告了波士顿市医院内科初级保健学员前四批学员的经历,并与传统路径学员进行了比较。初级保健住院医师在整个培训过程中始终致力于其从事普通内科职业的计划。相比之下,在培训开始时计划从事普通内科职业的传统培训学员中有三分之二改变计划转而从事专科医学。因此,初级保健路径强化了普通内科培训学员的职业计划,而传统培训则使潜在的通科医生倾向于专科医学。