Suppr超能文献

利用与食物相关的价值观对社区营养教育项目(干预措施)产生影响。

Leveraging Food-Related Values for Impact in Community Nutrition Education Programs (Interventions).

作者信息

Thomas Terrence, Gunden Cihat, Legesse Befikadu

机构信息

Department of Agribusiness, Applied Economics and Agrisciene Education, North Carolina A&T State University, 1601 E. Market St., Greensboro, NC 27411, USA.

Department of Agricultural Economics, School of Agriculture, Ege University, Bornova, 35040 Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Foods. 2023 Feb 7;12(4):714. doi: 10.3390/foods12040714.

Abstract

This study draws attention to the potential benefits of leveraging food values to amplify the impact of nutrition education programs. The study has collected data via a telephone survey from 417 randomly selected residents in Guilford County in the state of North Carolina. In our analysis, we have identified and used three underlying dimensions (ethical, social environmental and sensory) that summarize and capture the meaning of food-related values instead of a list of food values commonly used in the literature. Researchers have then used these dimensions as clustering variables to produce three segments from the data: value-positive, value-negative, and hedonic. Results show that residents in the value positive segment had positive perceptions of all values, those in value negative segment had negative perception of all values, and those in the hedonic segment had only positive perception of sensory values. A key finding is that value-positive residents have healthier food-related lifestyles and food-related behaviors than residents in the other segments. Interventions should focus on value-negative and hedonic residents and emphasize value-based education tailored to strengthening social/environmental and ethical food values. To ensure success, interventions should graft healthier lifestyle habits and behaviors on familiar behaviors and lifestyle.

摘要

本研究提请人们关注利用食物价值观来扩大营养教育项目影响力的潜在益处。该研究通过电话调查从北卡罗来纳州吉尔福德县随机抽取的417名居民中收集了数据。在我们的分析中,我们识别并使用了三个潜在维度(伦理、社会环境和感官)来总结和捕捉与食物相关价值观的含义,而不是文献中常用的一系列食物价值观。研究人员随后将这些维度用作聚类变量,从数据中产生了三个类别:价值积极型、价值消极型和享乐型。结果表明,价值积极型类别的居民对所有价值观都有积极看法,价值消极型类别的居民对所有价值观都有消极看法,而享乐型类别的居民仅对感官价值观有积极看法。一个关键发现是,与其他类别的居民相比,价值积极型居民拥有更健康的与食物相关的生活方式和行为。干预措施应侧重于价值消极型和享乐型居民,并强调基于价值观的教育,以强化社会/环境和伦理食物价值观。为确保成功,干预措施应将更健康的生活习惯和行为融入熟悉的行为和生活方式中。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

7
Does opening a supermarket in a food desert change the food environment?在食品荒漠中开设超市能否改变食品环境?
Health Place. 2017 Jul;46:249-256. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.06.002. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
10
Health and sustainability.健康与可持续性。
Health Promot Int. 2014 Sep;29(3):558-68. doi: 10.1093/heapro/das071. Epub 2013 Jan 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验