Suppr超能文献

家庭多受害者筛查量表(FPS-J)的日本版本的开发。

Development of A Japanese Version of the Family Poly-Victimization Screen (FPS-J).

机构信息

Department of Family Nursing, Division of Health Sciences & Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

Global Nursing Research Center, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 10;20(4):3142. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043142.

Abstract

This study developed a Japanese version of the Family Poly-Victimization Screen (FPS-J) and assessed its validity. A cross-sectional study using self-report questionnaires was conducted with parents of children in Tokyo, Japan, from January to February 2022. To test the validity of the FPS-J, we used the Japanese versions of the revised Conflict Tactics Scale Short Form (J-CTS2SF) as the gold standard for intimate partner violence (IPV), the Conflict Tactics Scale Parent-Child (J-CTS-PC) for child abuse (CAN), the Conflict Tactics Scale (J-MCTS) for elder abuse, the K6-J for depression and anxiety, the PCL5-J for post-traumatic stress disorder, and the J-KIDSCREEN for Health-related Quality of Life among children. Data from 483 participants (response rate: 22.6%) were used. The J-CTS2SF and J-CTS-PC scores were significantly higher among the IPV/CAN-victim groups than in the non-victimized groups classified by the FPS-J ( < 0.001). The JMCTS scores did not differ significantly between the victim and non-victim groups ( = 0.44), but the PCL5-J, K6-J, and J-KIDSCREEN-10 scores were either significantly higher or lower among victims of violence than among the non-victim groups ( < 0.05). This study suggests the validity of parts of the FPS-J, especially the IPV against respondents and CAN by respondents.

摘要

本研究开发了家庭多受害者筛查问卷(FPS-J)的日文版,并评估了其效度。本研究采用问卷调查的方法,于 2022 年 1 月至 2 月在日本东京的儿童家长中进行了一项横断面研究。为了检验 FPS-J 的有效性,我们使用修订后的冲突策略量表短式问卷(J-CTS2SF)作为亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的金标准,使用儿童虐待冲突策略量表(J-CTS-PC)作为儿童虐待(CAN)的金标准,使用冲突策略量表(J-MCTS)作为老年虐待的金标准,使用 K6-J 作为抑郁和焦虑的金标准,使用 PCL5-J 作为创伤后应激障碍的金标准,使用 J-KIDSCREEN 作为儿童健康相关生活质量的金标准。共纳入 483 名参与者(应答率:22.6%)的数据。与 FPS-J 分类的非受害者相比,IPV/CAN 受害者组的 J-CTS2SF 和 J-CTS-PC 评分显著更高(<0.001)。JMCTS 评分在受害者和非受害者组之间无显著差异(=0.44),但 PCL5-J、K6-J 和 J-KIDSCREEN-10 评分在暴力受害者中高于或低于非受害者组(<0.05)。本研究提示 FPS-J 的部分内容具有有效性,尤其是针对受访者的 IPV 和受访者的 CAN。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验