Law School, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China.
Law School, Sichuan University, Chengdu 610207, China.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 13;20(4):3273. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20043273.
Since "ecological civilization" was written into the constitution, China has continuously strengthened ecological and environmental protection and innovatively established an environmental public interest litigation system. However, China's current environmental public interest litigation system is not sound, especially since the types and scope of environmental public interest litigation are unclear, which is the core problem we aim to solve. To explore the types of environmental public interest litigation in China and the possibility of expanding new fields, we first used the normative analysis method to review the legislation of environmental public interest litigation in China and then conducted an empirical analysis of 215 judgment documents of environmental public interest litigation in China, and we concluded that the legal types and scope of application of environmental public interest litigation in China are constantly expanding. To reduce environmental pollution and ecological damage as much as possible, we argue that China should further expand the application of environmental administrative public interest litigation to improve the environmental civil public interest litigation system and adhere to the criteria of "behavior standards first, result standards second" and "prevention first, recovery second". At the same time, through the internal connection mechanism between procuratorial suggestions and environmental administrative public interest litigation, the external cooperation between environmental organizations, procuratorates, and environmental administrative departments should be strengthened, and a new mechanism for environmental public interest litigation should be established and improved to accumulate useful experience in the judicial protection of China's ecological environment.
自“生态文明”写入宪法以来,中国不断加强生态环境保护,创新性地建立了环境公益诉讼制度。但中国现行的环境公益诉讼制度并不健全,尤其是环境公益诉讼的类型和适用范围不明确,这是我们旨在解决的核心问题。为了探索中国环境公益诉讼的类型以及拓展新领域的可能性,我们首先采用规范分析方法,审查了中国环境公益诉讼立法,然后对中国 215 份环境公益诉讼判决文书进行了实证分析,结论是中国环境公益诉讼的法律类型和适用范围正在不断扩大。为了尽可能减少环境污染和生态破坏,我们认为中国应进一步扩大环境行政公益诉讼的适用范围,完善环境民事公益诉讼制度,坚持“行为标准优先,结果标准次之”“预防为主,修复为辅”的原则。同时,通过检察建议与环境行政公益诉讼的内部衔接机制,加强环境组织、检察机关与环境行政部门之间的外部合作,建立和完善环境公益诉讼新机制,为中国生态环境司法保护积累有益经验。