Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, 20500 Turku, Finland.
Auria Clinical Informatics, Turku University Hospital, Hospital District of Southwest Finland, 20521 Turku, Finland.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jan 31;59(2):281. doi: 10.3390/medicina59020281.
: This single-center retrospective study was conducted to describe clinical characteristics and the disease course of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILD). : The study included adult patients with fibrosing ILD (IPF, non-IPF fibrosing ILD (F-ILD), and non-IPF progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF)) treated between 2014 and 2017. Patients were followed annually from the first visit until the end of the study period in 2019. Data were collected from the Turku University Hospital data lake and analyzed using descriptive statistics. : 591 patients formed the patient cohort: 110 had IPF, 194 F-ILD, 142 PPF, and the remaining 145 patients were uncertain, F-ILD-U, whose disease progression nature could not be confirmed by FVC measurements. There were more males in each patient group and median age of the groups was similar, although there were younger patients in the PPF, F-ILD, and F-ILD-U groups. PPF patients had more UIP pattern than F-ILD patients. Exposure-related ILDs were clearly the most found ILD diagnoses for both PPF and F-ILD, followed by unclassifiable IIP. Baseline FVC % predicted reduction in every group was moderate. Half of the patients in each group had comorbidities, and the most common were cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, sleep apnea, and chronic lower respiratory diseases; F-ILD-U patients had malignant diseases as well. IPF patients had less medications than the other groups. Glucocorticoids were the most used medication in all patient groups. More PPF and F-ILD patients remained in the follow-up than IPF and F-ILD-U patients. Similarly, mortality of F-ILD-U was the highest, followed by IPF. Evolvement of lung function, oxygen use, and number of acute hospitalizations were similar for IPF and PPF patients whereas the corresponding results were always better for F-ILD patients. : The disease course of IPF and PPF was similar, and PPF patient amount exceeded the amount of IPF patients.
: 这项单中心回顾性研究旨在描述间质性肺疾病(ILD)患者的临床特征和疾病过程。 : 该研究纳入了 2014 年至 2017 年期间接受治疗的成人纤维性ILD(IPF、非 IPF 纤维性ILD(F-ILD)和非 IPF 进行性肺纤维化(PPF))患者。患者从首次就诊起每年随访一次,随访至 2019 年研究结束。数据来自于图尔库大学医院的数据湖,并使用描述性统计进行分析。 : 该研究共纳入 591 例患者:110 例为 IPF,194 例为 F-ILD,142 例为 PPF,其余 145 例为不确定、F-ILD-U,其疾病进展性质无法通过 FVC 测量来确定。每个患者组中男性均多于女性,且组间中位年龄相似,但 PPF、F-ILD 和 F-ILD-U 组中存在较年轻的患者。PPF 患者的 UIP 模式比例高于 F-ILD 患者。与 F-ILD 相比,与暴露相关的ILD 显然是 PPF 和 F-ILD 最常见的ILD 诊断,其次是未分类的 II 型间质性肺疾病。每个组的基线 FVC%预测值降低均为中度。每个组的一半患者均有合并症,最常见的合并症为心血管疾病、糖尿病、睡眠呼吸暂停和慢性下呼吸道疾病;F-ILD-U 患者还患有恶性肿瘤。与其他组相比,IPF 患者的药物治疗较少。糖皮质激素是所有患者组中最常用的药物。PPF 和 F-ILD 患者在随访中所占比例高于 IPF 和 F-ILD-U 患者,而 F-ILD-U 患者的死亡率最高,其次是 IPF 患者。肺功能、氧使用和急性住院次数的演变在 IPF 和 PPF 患者中相似,而在 F-ILD 患者中则始终更好。 : IPF 和 PPF 的疾病过程相似,PPF 患者数量超过 IPF 患者。