Suppr超能文献

用于选择表征固体脂质微粒测试条件的体外药物释放方法的比较

Comparison of the In Vitro Drug Release Methods for the Selection of Test Conditions to Characterize Solid Lipid Microparticles.

作者信息

Wolska Eliza, Szymańska Martyna

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical Technology, Medical University of Gdansk, Hallera 107, 80-416 Gdansk, Poland.

Student Chapter of the International Society of Pharmaceutical Engineering (ISPE), Hallera 107, 80-416 Gdansk, Poland.

出版信息

Pharmaceutics. 2023 Feb 3;15(2):511. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15020511.

Abstract

The release profiles of active substances from microspheres are one of the most important features in solid lipid microparticles (SLM) characterization. Unfortunately, the results of the dissolution tests are largely dependent on the chosen method and test conditions, which in relation to novel dosage forms, such as dispersions of lipid microspheres, are not clearly defined in international compendiums and guidelines. This makes it impossible to compare the results of different studies. The aim of the research was to identify the factors most influencing the variability of the obtained results. An attempt was also made to select the most appropriate method for testing drug substance release from SLM. Various dissolution methods were employed (method I: without a membrane, method II: in a dialysis bag, and method III: in a Side-Bi-Side chamber), and the obtained release profiles of cyclosporine and indomethacin from SLM dispersions were compared. In addition to the effect of membranes, the types of acceptor fluids were also investigated. Significant differences were observed when testing the SLM formulations under various test conditions. The results were significantly influenced by the selected membrane, the acceptor fluid, or the difference in the concentrations of active substance between the donor and acceptor compartments. The burst effect observed in some experimental methods was not noticed in other conditions. At this stage, the method with a dialysis bag has been selected as the most suitable, while the methods without the membrane can only play a complementary role.

摘要

活性物质从微球中的释放曲线是固体脂质微粒(SLM)表征中最重要的特征之一。遗憾的是,溶出度试验的结果在很大程度上取决于所选方法和试验条件,而对于脂质微球分散体等新型剂型,国际药典和指南中并未明确规定这些条件。这使得不同研究的结果无法进行比较。该研究的目的是确定对所得结果变异性影响最大的因素。同时还尝试选择最适合测试SLM中药物释放的方法。采用了各种溶出方法(方法I:无膜,方法II:在透析袋中,方法III:在双室侧腔中),并比较了从SLM分散体中获得的环孢素和吲哚美辛的释放曲线。除了膜的影响外,还研究了接受液的类型。在不同测试条件下测试SLM制剂时观察到了显著差异。结果受到所选膜、接受液或供体和接受室之间活性物质浓度差异的显著影响。在某些实验方法中观察到的突释效应在其他条件下未被注意到。现阶段,已选择透析袋法作为最合适的方法,而无膜法只能起到补充作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f4c9/9964376/a907ab75ee1b/pharmaceutics-15-00511-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验