Keegan Ella, Wade Tracey D
Flinders Institute for Mental Health and Wellbeing, School of Psychology, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Int J Eat Disord. 2024 Apr;57(4):1020-1025. doi: 10.1002/eat.23918. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
Atypical anorexia nervosa (AN) is a serious eating disorder that is more common in the population than AN. Despite this, people with atypical AN are less likely to be referred or admitted for eating disorder treatment and there is evidence that they are less likely to complete or benefit from existing interventions. This study examined whether baseline readiness and/or confidence moderated outcomes from 10-session cognitive behavioral therapy among people with atypical AN and bulimia nervosa (BN), and whether the impact of these variables differed between diagnoses.
Participants (n = 67; 33 with atypical AN) were a subset from an outpatient treatment study. Linear mixed model analyses were conducted to examine whether baseline readiness and/or confidence moderated outcomes.
People with BN who had higher levels of readiness or confidence at baseline had steeper decreases in eating disorder psychopathology over time. There was no evidence that readiness or confidence moderated outcomes for people with atypical AN.
This study suggests that the moderators that have been identified for other eating disorders may not apply for people with atypical AN and highlights a need for future work to routinely investigate whether theoretically or empirically driven variables moderate outcomes in this little-understood population.
People with bulimia nervosa with higher readiness and confidence experienced greater decreases in eating disorder symptoms than people with lower readiness and confidence when treated with cognitive behavioral therapy. These findings did not apply to people with atypical anorexia nervosa. Results demonstrate that future work is urgently required to identify helpful treatments for people with atypical anorexia nervosa as well as the variables that have a positive impact on outcomes in treatment for these individuals.
非典型神经性厌食症(AN)是一种严重的饮食失调症,在人群中比典型神经性厌食症更为常见。尽管如此,非典型神经性厌食症患者被转介或收治接受饮食失调治疗的可能性较小,而且有证据表明他们不太可能完成现有干预措施或从中受益。本研究调查了基线时的准备程度和/或信心是否会调节非典型神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症(BN)患者接受10节认知行为疗法后的治疗效果,以及这些变量的影响在不同诊断之间是否存在差异。
参与者(n = 67;33例非典型神经性厌食症患者)是一项门诊治疗研究的子集。进行线性混合模型分析以检查基线时的准备程度和/或信心是否会调节治疗效果。
基线时准备程度或信心水平较高的神经性贪食症患者,随着时间的推移,饮食失调心理病理学症状的下降幅度更大。没有证据表明准备程度或信心会调节非典型神经性厌食症患者的治疗效果。
本研究表明,已确定的适用于其他饮食失调症的调节因素可能不适用于非典型神经性厌食症患者,并强调未来的研究需要常规调查理论或实证驱动的变量是否会调节这个了解甚少的人群的治疗效果。
在接受认知行为疗法治疗时,准备程度和信心较高的神经性贪食症患者比准备程度和信心较低的患者饮食失调症状的减轻幅度更大。这些发现不适用于非典型神经性厌食症患者。结果表明,迫切需要开展进一步研究,为非典型神经性厌食症患者确定有效的治疗方法,以及确定对这些个体治疗效果有积极影响的变量。