Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland.
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 25;13(1):3286. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29957-3.
SAGIT is an instrument created for the clinical assessment of acromegaly. Our objective was to test the usefulness of this tool in assessing disease activity of acromegalic patients in a single centre of Poznan, Poland using a retrospective study. Medical records of patients with acromegaly hospitalised at the Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Internal Medicine of Poznan University of Medical Sciences in Poland between January 2015 and December 2020 were analysed. SAGIT scores were assessed according to each patient's clinical and biochemical data. The results show that SAGIT scores were higher in treatment-naïve patients and the lowest in controlled patients. There were positive correlations between SAGIT scores and concentrations of calcium, phosphorus, HbA1C levels, and tumour invasiveness at the time of diagnosis. However, parameters such as age, vitamin D concentration, and time from diagnosis showed an inverse relationship with the SAGIT score. In ROC curve analysis, SAGIT scores of 5 or less discriminated controlled patients from uncontrolled (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 76.7%, specificity 78.5%, AUC 0.867). Also, SAGIT higher than 6 indicated for treatment start or escalation (p < 0.0001, sensitivity 80.88%, specificity 77.59%, AUC 0.866). Lack of signs and symptoms (S = 0) could not discriminate between controlled and uncontrolled disease, but predicted therapy maintenance (p < 0.0004, sensitivity 59.5%, specificity 58.2%, AUC 0.604). In conclusion, The SAGIT instrument is easy to use even when completed in the retrospective medical record review. It can be useful for distinguishing clinical stages of acromegaly and in decision-making.
SAGIT 是一种专为评估肢端肥大症而设计的仪器。我们的目的是通过回顾性研究,在波兰波兹南的一个中心测试该工具在评估肢端肥大症患者疾病活动度方面的有效性。分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2020 年 12 月期间在波兰波兹南医科大学内分泌、代谢和内科系住院的肢端肥大症患者的病历。根据每位患者的临床和生化数据评估 SAGIT 评分。结果表明,初治患者的 SAGIT 评分较高,控制患者的评分最低。SAGIT 评分与钙、磷、HbA1C 水平以及诊断时肿瘤侵袭性呈正相关。然而,年龄、维生素 D 浓度和诊断后时间等参数与 SAGIT 评分呈负相关。在 ROC 曲线分析中,SAGIT 评分 5 或更低可区分控制患者和未控制患者(p<0.0001,敏感性 76.7%,特异性 78.5%,AUC 0.867)。此外,SAGIT 评分高于 6 表示需要开始或升级治疗(p<0.0001,敏感性 80.88%,特异性 77.59%,AUC 0.866)。缺乏症状和体征(S=0)不能区分控制和未控制的疾病,但可预测治疗维持(p<0.0004,敏感性 59.5%,特异性 58.2%,AUC 0.604)。总之,SAGIT 仪器即使在回顾性病历审查中也易于使用。它可用于区分肢端肥大症的临床阶段并进行决策。