• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探索在爱尔兰实施每一次接触都算数(Making Every Contact Count)简短行为干预的障碍和促进因素:一项横断面调查研究。

Exploring barriers and enablers to the delivery of Making Every Contact Count brief behavioural interventions in Ireland: A cross-sectional survey study.

机构信息

Health Behaviour Change Research Group, School of Psychology, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland.

Office of the Chief Clinical Officer, Health Services Executive, Cork, Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Sep;28(3):753-772. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12652. Epub 2023 Feb 26.

DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12652
PMID:36843183
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The public health impact of the Irish Making Every Contact Count (MECC) brief intervention programme is dependent on delivery by health care professionals. We aimed to identify enablers and modifiable barriers to MECC intervention delivery to optimize MECC implementation.

DESIGN

Online cross-sectional survey design.

METHODS

Health care professionals (n = 4050) who completed MECC eLearning were invited to complete an online survey based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Multiple regression analysis identified predictors of MECC delivery (logistic regression to predict delivery or not; linear regression to predict frequency of delivery). Data were visualized using Confidence Interval-Based Estimates of Relevance (CIBER).

RESULTS

Seventy-nine per cent of participants (n = 283/357) had delivered a MECC intervention. In the multiple logistic regression (Nagelkerke's R  = .34), the significant enablers of intervention delivery were 'professional role' (OR = 1.86 [1.10, 3.15]) and 'intentions/goals' (OR = 4.75 [1.97, 11.45]); significant barriers included 'optimistic beliefs about consequences' (OR = .41 [.18, .94]) and 'negative emotions' (OR = .50 [.32, .77]). In the multiple linear regression (R  = .29), the significant enablers of frequency of MECC delivery were 'intentions/goals' (b = 10.16, p = .02) and professional role (b = 6.72, p = .03); the significant barriers were 'negative emotions' (b = -4.74, p = .04) and 'barriers to prioritisation' (b = -5.00, p = .01). CIBER analyses suggested six predictive domains with substantial room for improvement: 'intentions and goals', 'barriers to prioritisation', 'environmental resources', 'beliefs about capabilities', 'negative emotions' and 'skills'.

CONCLUSION

Implementation interventions to enhance MECC delivery should target intentions and goals, beliefs about capabilities, negative emotions, environmental resources, skills and barriers to prioritization.

摘要

目的

爱尔兰的每一次接触计数(MECC)简短干预计划对公众健康的影响取决于医疗保健专业人员的实施。我们旨在确定 MECC 干预实施的促进因素和可改变的障碍,以优化 MECC 的实施。

设计

在线横断面调查设计。

方法

完成 MECC 电子学习的医疗保健专业人员(n=4050)被邀请根据理论领域框架(TDF)完成在线调查。多元回归分析确定了 MECC 交付的预测因素(逻辑回归预测交付或不交付;线性回归预测交付频率)。使用置信区间基于相关性估计(CIBER)可视化数据。

结果

79%的参与者(n=283/357)实施了 MECC 干预。在多元逻辑回归(Nagelkerke 的 R=0.34)中,干预实施的显著促进因素是“专业角色”(OR=1.86[1.10,3.15])和“意图/目标”(OR=4.75[1.97,11.45]);显著障碍包括“对后果的乐观信念”(OR=0.41[0.18,0.94])和“负面情绪”(OR=0.50[0.32,0.77])。在多元线性回归(R=0.29)中,MECC 交付频率的显著促进因素是“意图/目标”(b=10.16,p=0.02)和专业角色(b=6.72,p=0.03);显著障碍是“负面情绪”(b=-4.74,p=0.04)和“优先事项障碍”(b=-5.00,p=0.01)。CIBER 分析表明,有六个具有很大改进空间的预测领域:“意图和目标”、“优先事项障碍”、“环境资源”、“能力信念”、“负面情绪”和“技能”。

结论

为了提高 MECC 的实施,应实施干预措施,以加强 MECC 的实施,针对意图和目标、能力信念、负面情绪、环境资源、技能和优先事项障碍。

相似文献

1
Exploring barriers and enablers to the delivery of Making Every Contact Count brief behavioural interventions in Ireland: A cross-sectional survey study.探索在爱尔兰实施每一次接触都算数(Making Every Contact Count)简短行为干预的障碍和促进因素:一项横断面调查研究。
Br J Health Psychol. 2023 Sep;28(3):753-772. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12652. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
2
Enhancing the implementation of the Making Every Contact Count brief behavioural intervention programme in Ireland: protocol for the Making MECC Work research programme.加强爱尔兰“每次接触都重要”简短行为干预计划的实施:“让MECC发挥作用”研究计划方案
HRB Open Res. 2022 Jan 18;5:6. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13481.1. eCollection 2022.
3
Optimizing Making Every Contact Count (MECC) interventions: A strategic behavioral analysis.优化“每一个接触都算数”(MECC)干预措施:策略性行为分析。
Health Psychol. 2021 Dec;40(12):960-973. doi: 10.1037/hea0001100. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
Optimising antimicrobial stewardship interventions in English primary care: a behavioural analysis of qualitative and intervention studies.优化英国基层医疗中的抗菌药物管理干预措施:定性和干预研究的行为分析。
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 17;10(12):e039284. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039284.
5
How useful is the Making Every Contact Count Healthy Conversation Skills approach for supporting people with musculoskeletal conditions?“让每次接触都重要”健康对话技能方法在支持肌肉骨骼疾病患者方面有多大作用?
Z Gesundh Wiss. 2022;30(10):2389-2405. doi: 10.1007/s10389-022-01718-y. Epub 2022 May 4.
6
Health professional and patient views of a novel prognostic test for melanoma: A theoretically informed qualitative study.健康专业人员和患者对一种新型黑色素瘤预后检测的看法:一项基于理论的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 4;17(4):e0265048. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265048. eCollection 2022.
7
Mapping regional implementation of 'Making Every Contact Count': mixed-methods evaluation of implementation stage, strategies, barriers and facilitators of implementation.绘制“让每次接触都算数”的区域实施情况图:实施阶段、实施策略、障碍和促进因素的混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 22;14(7):e084208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084208.
8
'It's difficult, I think it's complicated': Health care professionals' barriers and enablers to providing opportunistic behaviour change interventions during routine medical consultations.“这很困难,我认为这很复杂”:医疗保健专业人员在常规医疗咨询中提供机会性行为改变干预措施的障碍和促成因素。
Br J Health Psychol. 2019 Sep;24(3):571-592. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12368. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
9
Barriers and enablers to providing evidence-based in-hospital urinary continence care: A cross-sectional survey informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework.提供基于证据的住院期间尿失禁护理的障碍和促进因素:基于理论领域框架的横断面调查。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Aug;32(15-16):5103-5112. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16776. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
10
What helps and hinders midwives in engaging with pregnant women about stopping smoking? A cross-sectional survey of perceived implementation difficulties among midwives in the North East of England.哪些因素有助于或阻碍助产士与孕妇就戒烟问题进行沟通?一项针对英格兰东北部助产士感知实施难点的横断面调查。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 24;7:36. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-36.

引用本文的文献

1
Lifestyle Medicine Pillars and Pedagogies in Pre-registration Health Profession Degrees: A Scoping Review.预注册健康专业学位中的生活方式医学支柱与教学法:一项范围综述
Med Sci Educ. 2025 Mar 17;35(3):1787-1801. doi: 10.1007/s40670-025-02359-y. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
A qualitative exploration of service users' experiences of weight management conversations in a mental health setting.对精神卫生环境中服务使用者体重管理对话体验的质性探索。
PEC Innov. 2025 Mar 22;6:100389. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2025.100389. eCollection 2025 Jun.
3
Primary prevention in hospitals in 20 high-income countries in Europe - A case of not "Making Every Contact Count"?
欧洲20个高收入国家医院中的一级预防——这是一个“未能充分利用每次接触机会”的案例吗?
Health Policy. 2025 Jan;151:105199. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.105199. Epub 2024 Nov 8.
4
Making Every Contact Count: health professionals' experiences of integrating conversations about Snacktivity to promote physical activity within routine consultations - a qualitative study.让每次接触都算数:健康专业人员在日常咨询中整合关于 Snacktivity 的对话以促进身体活动的经验——一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Oct 22;14(10):e085233. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085233.
5
Mapping regional implementation of 'Making Every Contact Count': mixed-methods evaluation of implementation stage, strategies, barriers and facilitators of implementation.绘制“让每次接触都算数”的区域实施情况图:实施阶段、实施策略、障碍和促进因素的混合方法评估。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jul 22;14(7):e084208. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084208.
6
Determinants of physical activity promotion in primary care from the patient perspective of people at risk of or living with chronic disease: a COM-B analysis.从患有或面临慢性病风险人群的患者角度出发,确定初级保健中促进身体活动的决定因素:COM-B 分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 May 28;25(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02440-2.
7
Impacts of the COVID-19 public health emergency on healthcare professional delivery of opportunistic behaviour change interventions: a retrospective cohort study.2019年冠状病毒病公共卫生突发事件对医疗保健专业人员提供机会性行为改变干预措施的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb 5;24(1):167. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10522-7.