Singla Rimpi, Banu Nasreen T, Arora Aashima, Aggarwal Neelam, Gupta Madhu
Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, IND.
Cureus. 2023 Jan 24;15(1):e34144. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34144. eCollection 2023 Jan.
Introduction Advancements in prenatal diagnostic techniques have led to an increase in demand for termination of pregnancy for fetal anomalies (TOPFA). While relaxation in the legal gestational age limits across various countries relieves an important barrier, there is a need to identify the reasons that lead to delays in seeking abortion for fetal anomalies, because abortion-related complications increase with gestational age. Methods In this hospital-based qualitative study, antenatal women referred to a tertiary care institute in North India because of major fetal anomalies were explained about the study. Those women who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were recruited after taking consent. Details of antenatal care and prenatal tests were recorded. An in-depth inquiry was made into the reasons for the delay in prenatal tests, the delay in the decision for abortion, and specific problems that they faced in seeking TOPFA. Results Out of 80 women who met the inclusion criteria and consented to participate, more than 75% had received antenatal care in public healthcare facilities. Less than 50% of women received folic acid in the first trimester while 26% had first contact with healthcare facilities in the second trimester. Only 21 women underwent screening for common aneuploidies. Second-trimester anomaly scan was delayed in 35 women due to women-centered reasons (n = 17) or provider-centered (n = 19) reasons. Only 37.5% of women were counseled about fetal anomalies by their primary care provider. Owing to delay at multiple levels, 40 women (50%) could receive counseling about fetal abnormality for the first time after 20 weeks. These women could not be offered abortion because this study was carried out before the amendments in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act in India. The older act allowed abortion up to 20 weeks of gestation. Seventeen women could obtain permission for an abortion from a court of law. Arrangements for travel and stay and dependence on family members were the main problems faced by women seeking TOPFA. Conclusions Delay in diagnosis of a fetal anomaly due to delay in seeking antenatal care, irregular follow-up, and lack of pre-test counseling are the major reasons for the delay in the decision for abortion. This is further compounded by inadequate post-test counseling. Lack of awareness, failure or delay in counseling, need to travel to another facility for abortion, dependence on family members, and financial issues are the major barriers.
引言 产前诊断技术的进步导致因胎儿异常而终止妊娠(TOPFA)的需求增加。虽然各国放宽法定孕周限制消除了一个重要障碍,但有必要找出导致因胎儿异常而寻求堕胎延迟的原因,因为与堕胎相关的并发症会随着孕周增加而增多。方法 在这项基于医院的定性研究中,向印度北部一家三级医疗机构转诊的因严重胎儿异常前来的孕妇说明了该研究情况。那些符合纳入标准的妇女在获得同意后被招募。记录了产前护理和产前检查的详细情况。深入询问了产前检查延迟、堕胎决定延迟以及她们在寻求TOPFA时面临的具体问题的原因。结果 在80名符合纳入标准并同意参与的妇女中,超过75%在公共医疗设施接受过产前护理。不到50%的妇女在孕早期服用过叶酸,而26%在孕中期首次与医疗设施接触。只有21名妇女接受了常见非整倍体筛查。35名妇女因以女性为中心的原因(n = 17)或以提供者为中心的原因(n = 19)导致孕中期异常扫描延迟。只有37.5%的妇女由其初级保健提供者提供过胎儿异常咨询。由于多个层面的延迟,40名妇女(50%)在20周后才首次得到胎儿异常咨询。由于本研究是在印度《终止妊娠法》修订之前进行的,这些妇女无法获得堕胎服务。旧法允许在妊娠20周内堕胎。17名妇女从法院获得了堕胎许可。寻求TOPFA的妇女面临的主要问题是旅行和住宿安排以及对家庭成员的依赖。结论 由于寻求产前护理延迟、随访不规律以及缺乏检查前咨询导致胎儿异常诊断延迟,是堕胎决定延迟的主要原因。检查后咨询不足使情况更加复杂。缺乏认识、咨询失败或延迟、需要前往另一家机构进行堕胎、对家庭成员的依赖以及经济问题是主要障碍。