• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

堕胎护理的障碍及其对前往接受服务的患者的影响:来自两个州的定性研究结果

Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States.

作者信息

Jerman Jenna, Frohwirth Lori, Kavanaugh Megan L, Blades Nakeisha

机构信息

research, associate, Guttmacher Institute, New York.

senior research, associate Guttmacher Institute, New York.

出版信息

Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Jun;49(2):95-102. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12024. Epub 2017 Apr 10.

DOI:10.1363/psrh.12024
PMID:28394463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5953191/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Abortion availability and accessibility vary by state. Especially in areas where services are restricted or limited, some women travel to obtain abortion services in other states. Little is known about the experience of travel to obtain abortion.

METHODS

In January and February 2015, in-depth interviews were conducted with 29 patients seeking abortion services at six facilities in Michigan and New Mexico. Eligible women were 18 or older, spoke English, and had traveled either across state lines or more than 100 miles within the state. Respondents were asked to describe their experience from pregnancy discovery to the day of the abortion procedure. Barriers to accessing abortion care and consequences of these barriers were identified through inductive and deductive analysis.

RESULTS

Respondents described 15 barriers to abortion care while traveling to obtain services, and three major consequences of experiencing those barriers. Barriers were grouped into five categories: travel-related logistical issues, system navigation issues, limited clinic options, financial issues, and state or clinic restrictions. Consequences were delays in care, negative mental health impacts and considering self-induction. The experience of barriers complicated the process of obtaining an abortion, but the effect of any individual barrier was unclear. Instead, the experience of multiple barriers appeared to have a compounding effect, resulting in negative consequences for women traveling for abortion.

CONCLUSION

The amalgamation of barriers to abortion care experienced simultaneously can have significant consequences for patients.

摘要

背景

堕胎服务的可获得性和可及性因州而异。特别是在服务受到限制或有限的地区,一些妇女会前往其他州获取堕胎服务。对于为获取堕胎服务而旅行的经历,人们了解甚少。

方法

2015年1月和2月,对在密歇根州和新墨西哥州六个机构寻求堕胎服务的29名患者进行了深入访谈。符合条件的女性年龄在18岁及以上,说英语,并且跨州旅行或在本州内旅行超过100英里。受访者被要求描述从发现怀孕到堕胎手术当天的经历。通过归纳和演绎分析确定了获得堕胎护理的障碍以及这些障碍的后果。

结果

受访者描述了在前往获取服务的过程中遇到的15个堕胎护理障碍,以及遇到这些障碍的三个主要后果。障碍分为五类:与旅行相关的后勤问题、系统导航问题、诊所选择有限、财务问题以及州或诊所限制。后果包括护理延迟、对心理健康产生负面影响以及考虑自行引产。障碍的经历使堕胎过程变得复杂,但任何单个障碍的影响尚不清楚。相反,多种障碍的经历似乎具有叠加效应,对前往堕胎的女性产生负面影响。

结论

同时经历的堕胎护理障碍的合并可能对患者产生重大后果。

相似文献

1
Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences For Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States.堕胎护理的障碍及其对前往接受服务的患者的影响:来自两个州的定性研究结果
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Jun;49(2):95-102. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12024. Epub 2017 Apr 10.
2
"It's not something you talk about really": information barriers encountered by women who travel long distances for abortion care.“真的没人会谈论这个”:长途跋涉寻求堕胎服务的女性所遭遇的信息障碍。
Contraception. 2019 Jul;100(1):79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.03.048. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
3
Cross-country abortion travel to England and Wales: results from a cross-sectional survey exploring people's experiences crossing borders to obtain care.跨境堕胎旅行至英格兰和威尔士:一项横断面调查研究人们跨境获取医疗服务的经验
Reprod Health. 2021 May 22;18(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01158-z.
4
Travel for Abortion Services in Alabama and Delays Obtaining Care.阿拉巴马州堕胎服务旅行和获得护理的延迟。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Sep-Oct;27(5):523-529. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 12.
5
Distance Traveled to Obtain Clinical Abortion Care in the United States and Reasons for Clinic Choice.美国获取临床堕胎护理的距离以及选择诊所的原因。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019 Dec;28(12):1623-1631. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2018.7496. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
6
Experiences Accessing Abortion Care in Alabama among Women Traveling for Services.阿拉巴马州寻求堕胎服务的女性外出就医的经历。
Womens Health Issues. 2016 May-Jun;26(3):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
7
Abortion patients' decision making about where to obtain out-of-state care following Texas' 2021 abortion ban.得克萨斯州 2021 年堕胎禁令后,堕胎患者关于在哪里获得州外护理的决策。
Health Serv Res. 2024 Feb;59(1):e14226. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.14226. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
8
Medication abortion use among low-income and rural Texans before and during state-imposed restrictions and after FDA-updated labeling.在得克萨斯州实施限制以及美国食品药品监督管理局更新标签前后,低收入和农村得克萨斯州居民药物流产使用情况。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Aug;223(2):236.e1-236.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.02.028. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
9
Barriers around access to abortion experienced by rural women in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州农村妇女在获取堕胎服务方面遇到的障碍。
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Jan-Mar;16(1):3538. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
10
Traveling to California from out of state to receive abortion services at a hospital-based clinic: A qualitative study of people's experiences.从外州前往加利福尼亚州在医院诊所接受堕胎服务:对人们体验的定性研究。
Sex Reprod Healthc. 2022 Dec;34:100784. doi: 10.1016/j.srhc.2022.100784. Epub 2022 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Parallel paths: abortion access restrictions in the USA and Iran.平行轨迹:美国和伊朗的堕胎限制
Contracept Reprod Med. 2025 Jul 25;10(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s40834-025-00382-3.
2
Using Natural Language Processing to Describe the Use of an Online Community for Abortion During 2022: Dynamic Topic Modeling Analysis of Reddit Posts.利用自然语言处理描述2022年一个堕胎在线社区的使用情况:Reddit帖子的动态主题建模分析
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jul 9;5:e72771. doi: 10.2196/72771.
3
Behavioral Innovations to Access Abortion Post-Dobbs: A Qualitative Thematic Analysis of Reddit's r/abortion Community in 2022.多布斯案后获取堕胎服务的行为创新:对2022年Reddit上r/堕胎社区的定性主题分析
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251351192. doi: 10.1177/00469580251351192. Epub 2025 Jun 27.
4
Obstetricians' views on extending the 12-week abortion limit in Belgium: A qualitative study.比利时产科医生对延长12周堕胎期限的看法:一项定性研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 18;20(6):e0325434. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325434. eCollection 2025.
5
The impact of gestational age limits on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.孕周限制对堕胎相关结果的影响:法律与健康证据的综合分析
BMC Glob Public Health. 2025 Feb 3;3(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s44263-025-00124-2.
6
Adolescents' political and personal responses to recent policies restricting abortion and gender-affirming care.青少年对近期限制堕胎和性别认同医疗护理政策的政治及个人反应。
Contracept X. 2024 Dec 18;6:100116. doi: 10.1016/j.conx.2024.100116. eCollection 2024.
7
Weight and Procedural Abortion Complications: A Systematic Review.体重与人工流产并发症:一项系统评价
Obstet Gynecol. 2025 Mar 1;145(3):307-315. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005821. Epub 2025 Jan 2.
8
Abortion care preferences and trade-offs when traveling out-of-state for facility-based services: findings from a discrete choice experiment.前往州外接受机构化服务时的堕胎护理偏好与权衡:离散选择实验的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1573. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12005-9.
9
[Barriers to accessing abortion care: an analysis from the perspective of unintended pregnant women-findings from the ELSA study].[获得堕胎护理的障碍:从不育孕妇的角度进行分析——ELSA研究的结果]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Jan;68(1):28-37. doi: 10.1007/s00103-024-03987-2. Epub 2024 Dec 4.
10
Abortion Surveillance - United States, 2022.《2022 年美国堕胎监测报告》
MMWR Surveill Summ. 2024 Nov 28;73(7):1-28. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7307a1.

本文引用的文献

1
Travel for Abortion Services in Alabama and Delays Obtaining Care.阿拉巴马州堕胎服务旅行和获得护理的延迟。
Womens Health Issues. 2017 Sep-Oct;27(5):523-529. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2017.04.002. Epub 2017 May 12.
2
Abortion Incidence and Service Availability In the United States, 2014.2014年美国的堕胎发生率与服务可及性
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017 Mar;49(1):17-27. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12015. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
Women's Mental Health and Well-being 5 Years After Receiving or Being Denied an Abortion: A Prospective, Longitudinal Cohort Study.女性在堕胎后五年的精神健康和幸福感:一项前瞻性、纵向队列研究。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):169-178. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3478.
4
Impact of Clinic Closures on Women Obtaining Abortion Services After Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.在德克萨斯州实施一项限制性法律后,诊所关闭对妇女获得堕胎服务的影响。
Am J Public Health. 2016 May;106(5):857-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2016.303134. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
5
Experiences Accessing Abortion Care in Alabama among Women Traveling for Services.阿拉巴马州寻求堕胎服务的女性外出就医的经历。
Womens Health Issues. 2016 May-Jun;26(3):298-304. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
6
Women's experiences seeking abortion care shortly after the closure of clinics due to a restrictive law in Texas.在得克萨斯州一项限制性法律导致诊所关闭后不久,女性寻求堕胎护理的经历。
Contraception. 2016 Apr;93(4):292-297. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.017. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
7
Abortion Patients' Experience and Perceptions of Waiting Periods: Survey Evidence before Arizona's Two-visit 24-hour Mandatory Waiting Period Law.堕胎患者对等待期的体验与认知:亚利桑那州两次就诊24小时强制等待期法律实施前的调查证据
Womens Health Issues. 2016 Jan-Feb;26(1):60-6. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
8
The experiences and adaptations of abortion providers practicing under a new TRAP law: a qualitative study.在新的《堕胎限制与监管法案》下执业的堕胎服务提供者的经历与适应情况:一项定性研究
Contraception. 2015 Jun;91(6):507-12. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.03.003. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
9
Implications for women of Louisiana's law requiring abortion providers to have hospital admitting privileges.路易斯安那州要求堕胎提供者具备医院准入特权的法律对女性的影响。
Contraception. 2015 May;91(5):368-72. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.02.001. Epub 2015 Mar 2.
10
A comparison of depression and anxiety symptom trajectories between women who had an abortion and women denied one.曾接受人工流产的女性与被拒绝人工流产的女性之间抑郁和焦虑症状轨迹的比较。
Psychol Med. 2015 Jul;45(10):2073-82. doi: 10.1017/S0033291714003213. Epub 2015 Jan 28.