Suppr超能文献

通过机器学习共识聚类分析美国80岁及以上肾移植受者的不同表型。

Distinct phenotypes of kidney transplant recipients aged 80 years or older in the USA by machine learning consensus clustering.

作者信息

Thongprayoon Charat, Jadlowiec Caroline C, Mao Shennen A, Mao Michael A, Leeaphorn Napat, Kaewput Wisit, Pattharanitima Pattharawin, Nissaisorakarn Pitchaphon, Cooper Matthew, Cheungpasitporn Wisit

机构信息

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023 Feb 20;5(1):e000137. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000137. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to identify distinct clusters of very elderly kidney transplant recipients aged ≥80 and assess clinical outcomes among these unique clusters.

DESIGN

Cohort study with machine learning (ML) consensus clustering approach.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

All very elderly (age ≥80 at time of transplant) kidney transplant recipients in the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network/United Network for Organ Sharing database database from 2010 to 2019.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Distinct clusters of very elderly kidney transplant recipients and their post-transplant outcomes including death-censored graft failure, overall mortality and acute allograft rejection among the assigned clusters.

RESULTS

Consensus cluster analysis was performed in 419 very elderly kidney transplant and identified three distinct clusters that best represented the clinical characteristics of very elderly kidney transplant recipients. Recipients in cluster 1 received standard Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) non-extended criteria donor (ECD) kidneys from deceased donors. Recipients in cluster 2 received kidneys from older, hypertensive ECD deceased donors with a KDPI score ≥85%. Kidneys for cluster 2 patients had longer cold ischaemia time and the highest use of machine perfusion. Recipients in clusters 1 and 2 were more likely to be on dialysis at the time of transplant (88.3%, 89.4%). Recipients in cluster 3 were more likely to be preemptive (39%) or had a dialysis duration less than 1 year (24%). These recipients received living donor kidney transplants. Cluster 3 had the most favourable post-transplant outcomes. Compared with cluster 3, cluster 1 had comparable survival but higher death-censored graft failure, while cluster 2 had lower patient survival, higher death-censored graft failure and more acute rejection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study used an unsupervised ML approach to cluster very elderly kidney transplant recipients into three clinically unique clusters with distinct post-transplant outcomes. These findings from an ML clustering approach provide additional understanding towards individualised medicine and opportunities to improve care for very elderly kidney transplant recipients.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在识别年龄≥80岁的高龄肾移植受者的不同亚组,并评估这些独特亚组的临床结局。

设计

采用机器学习(ML)共识聚类方法的队列研究。

设置与参与者

2010年至2019年器官获取与移植网络/器官共享联合网络数据库中所有年龄≥80岁的高龄肾移植受者。

主要结局指标

高龄肾移植受者的不同亚组及其移植后结局,包括死亡删失的移植物失败、总死亡率和指定亚组中的急性移植物排斥反应。

结果

对419例高龄肾移植受者进行了共识聚类分析,确定了三个不同的亚组,它们最能代表高龄肾移植受者的临床特征。第1组受者接受来自已故供者的标准肾脏供者特征指数(KDPI)非扩大标准供者(ECD)肾脏。第2组受者接受来自年龄较大、患有高血压的ECD已故供者的肾脏,KDPI评分≥85%。第2组患者的肾脏冷缺血时间更长,机器灌注使用率最高。第1组和第2组受者在移植时更有可能正在接受透析(分别为88.3%、89.4%)。第3组受者更有可能是先发制人移植(39%)或透析时间少于1年(24%)。这些受者接受了活体供肾移植。第3组移植后结局最有利。与第3组相比,第1组生存率相当,但死亡删失的移植物失败率更高,而第2组患者生存率较低,死亡删失的移植物失败率更高,急性排斥反应更多。

结论

我们的研究采用无监督ML方法将高龄肾移植受者分为三个临床特征独特、移植后结局不同的亚组。这些来自ML聚类方法的发现为个性化医疗提供了更多理解,并为改善高龄肾移植受者的护理提供了机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/17f6/9944353/0de85630ac15/bmjsit-2022-000137f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验