• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过机器学习共识聚类确定的糖尿病已故供体肾移植受者之间的差异

Differences between Kidney Transplant Recipients from Deceased Donors with Diabetes Mellitus as Identified by Machine Learning Consensus Clustering.

作者信息

Thongprayoon Charat, Miao Jing, Jadlowiec Caroline C, Mao Shennen A, Mao Michael A, Leeaphorn Napat, Kaewput Wisit, Pattharanitima Pattharawin, Tangpanithandee Supawit, Krisanapan Pajaree, Nissaisorakarn Pitchaphon, Cooper Matthew, Cheungpasitporn Wisit

机构信息

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 3;13(7):1094. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071094.

DOI:10.3390/jpm13071094
PMID:37511707
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10381319/
Abstract

Clinical outcomes of deceased donor kidney transplants coming from diabetic donors currently remain inconsistent, possibly due to high heterogeneities in this population. Our study aimed to cluster recipients of diabetic deceased donor kidney transplants using an unsupervised machine learning approach in order to identify subgroups with high risk of inferior outcomes and potential variables associated with these outcomes. Consensus cluster analysis was performed based on recipient-, donor-, and transplant-related characteristics in 7876 recipients of diabetic deceased donor kidney transplants from 2010 to 2019 in the OPTN/UNOS database. We determined the important characteristics of each assigned cluster and compared the post-transplant outcomes between the clusters. Consensus cluster analysis identified three clinically distinct clusters. Recipients in cluster 1 ( = 2903) were characterized by oldest age (64 ± 8 years), highest rate of comorbid diabetes mellitus (55%). They were more likely to receive kidney allografts from donors that were older (58 ± 6.3 years), had hypertension (89%), met expanded criteria donor (ECD) status (78%), had a high rate of cerebrovascular death (63%), and carried a high kidney donor profile index (KDPI). Recipients in cluster 2 ( = 687) were younger (49 ± 13 years) and all were re-transplant patients with higher panel reactive antibodies (PRA) (88 [IQR 46, 98]) who received kidneys from younger (44 ± 11 years), non-ECD deceased donors (88%) with low numbers of HLA mismatch (4 [IQR 2, 5]). The cluster 3 cohort was characterized by first-time kidney transplant recipients (100%) who received kidney allografts from younger (42 ± 11 years), non-ECD deceased donors (98%). Compared to cluster 3, cluster 1 had higher incidence of primary non-function, delayed graft function, patient death and death-censored graft failure, whereas cluster 2 had higher incidence of delayed graft function and death-censored graft failure but comparable primary non-function and patient death. An unsupervised machine learning approach characterized diabetic donor kidney transplant patients into three clinically distinct clusters with differing outcomes. Our data highlight opportunities to improve utilization of high KDPI kidneys coming from diabetic donors in recipients with survival-limiting comorbidities such as those observed in cluster 1.

摘要

目前,来自糖尿病供体的已故供体肾移植的临床结果仍不一致,这可能是由于该人群存在高度异质性。我们的研究旨在使用无监督机器学习方法对糖尿病已故供体肾移植受者进行聚类,以识别预后较差的高风险亚组以及与这些结果相关的潜在变量。基于2010年至2019年OPTN/UNOS数据库中7876例糖尿病已故供体肾移植受者的受者、供体和移植相关特征进行了共识聚类分析。我们确定了每个指定聚类的重要特征,并比较了各聚类之间的移植后结果。共识聚类分析确定了三个临床上不同的聚类。聚类1(n = 2903)中的受者年龄最大(64±8岁),合并糖尿病的发生率最高(55%)。他们更有可能接受来自年龄较大(58±6.3岁)、患有高血压(89%)、符合扩大标准供体(ECD)状态(78%)、脑血管死亡发生率高(63%)且肾脏供体特征指数(KDPI)高的供体的肾移植。聚类2(n = 687)中的受者较年轻(49±13岁),并且都是再次移植患者,其群体反应性抗体(PRA)较高(88[四分位间距46, 98]),他们接受的肾脏来自较年轻(44±11岁)、非ECD已故供体(88%),HLA错配数量较少(4[四分位间距2, 5])。聚类3队列的特征是首次肾移植受者(100%),他们接受的肾移植来自较年轻(42±11岁)、非ECD已故供体(98%)。与聚类3相比,聚类1的原发性无功能、移植肾功能延迟、患者死亡和死亡审查的移植失败发生率更高,而聚类2的移植肾功能延迟和死亡审查的移植失败发生率更高,但原发性无功能和患者死亡情况相当。一种无监督机器学习方法将糖尿病供体肾移植患者分为三个临床上不同的聚类,其结果各异。我们的数据突出了改善在患有诸如聚类1中观察到的限制生存的合并症的受者中使用来自糖尿病供体的高KDPI肾脏的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3773/10381319/16a2486c9f00/jpm-13-01094-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3773/10381319/f76a9295a449/jpm-13-01094-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3773/10381319/3c3b4bf6cfb8/jpm-13-01094-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3773/10381319/7be757899f33/jpm-13-01094-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3773/10381319/16a2486c9f00/jpm-13-01094-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3773/10381319/f76a9295a449/jpm-13-01094-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3773/10381319/3c3b4bf6cfb8/jpm-13-01094-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3773/10381319/7be757899f33/jpm-13-01094-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3773/10381319/16a2486c9f00/jpm-13-01094-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Differences between Kidney Transplant Recipients from Deceased Donors with Diabetes Mellitus as Identified by Machine Learning Consensus Clustering.通过机器学习共识聚类确定的糖尿病已故供体肾移植受者之间的差异
J Pers Med. 2023 Jul 3;13(7):1094. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071094.
2
Characteristics of Kidney Recipients of High Kidney Donor Profile Index Kidneys as Identified by Machine Learning Consensus Clustering.通过机器学习共识聚类识别的高肾脏捐赠者特征指数肾脏受者的特征
J Pers Med. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):1992. doi: 10.3390/jpm12121992.
3
Reexamining Transplant Outcomes in Acute Kidney Injury Kidneys Through Machine Learning.通过机器学习重新审视急性肾损伤肾脏的移植结果。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Oct;38(10):e15470. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15470.
4
Clinical Phenotypes of Dual Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States as Identified through Machine Learning Consensus Clustering.通过机器学习共识聚类鉴定的美国双肾移植受者的临床表型。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Dec 12;58(12):1831. doi: 10.3390/medicina58121831.
5
Use of Machine Learning Consensus Clustering to Identify Distinct Subtypes of Black Kidney Transplant Recipients and Associated Outcomes.运用机器学习共识聚类来识别黑种人肾移植受者的不同亚型及其相关结局。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jul 1;157(7):e221286. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1286. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
6
Machine Learning Consensus Clustering of Morbidly Obese Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States.美国病态肥胖肾移植受者的机器学习共识聚类
J Clin Med. 2022 Jun 8;11(12):3288. doi: 10.3390/jcm11123288.
7
Re-assessing prolonged cold ischemia time in kidney transplantation through machine learning consensus clustering.通过机器学习共识聚类重新评估肾移植中延长的冷缺血时间。
Clin Transplant. 2024 Jan;38(1):e15201. doi: 10.1111/ctr.15201. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
8
Differences between kidney retransplant recipients as identified by machine learning consensus clustering.基于机器学习共识聚类识别的肾移植受者差异。
Clin Transplant. 2023 May;37(5):e14943. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14943. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
9
Distinct phenotypes of kidney transplant recipients aged 80 years or older in the USA by machine learning consensus clustering.通过机器学习共识聚类分析美国80岁及以上肾移植受者的不同表型。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023 Feb 20;5(1):e000137. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000137. eCollection 2023.
10
Distinct Phenotypes of Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States with Limited Functional Status as Identified through Machine Learning Consensus Clustering.通过机器学习共识聚类确定的美国功能状态有限的肾移植受者的不同表型
J Pers Med. 2022 May 25;12(6):859. doi: 10.3390/jpm12060859.

引用本文的文献

1
Distinct clinical profiles and post-transplant outcomes among kidney transplant recipients with lower education levels: uncovering patterns through machine learning clustering.低教育水平的肾移植受者具有不同的临床特征和移植后结局:通过机器学习聚类揭示模式。
Ren Fail. 2023;45(2):2292163. doi: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2292163. Epub 2023 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Differences between Very Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients as Identified by Machine Learning Consensus Clustering.基于机器学习共识聚类分析的超高敏肾移植受者差异。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 May 18;59(5):977. doi: 10.3390/medicina59050977.
2
Distinct Phenotypes of Non-Citizen Kidney Transplant Recipients in the United States by Machine Learning Consensus Clustering.通过机器学习共识聚类分析美国非公民肾移植受者的不同表型
Medicines (Basel). 2023 Mar 27;10(4):25. doi: 10.3390/medicines10040025.
3
Distinct phenotypes of kidney transplant recipients aged 80 years or older in the USA by machine learning consensus clustering.
通过机器学习共识聚类分析美国80岁及以上肾移植受者的不同表型。
BMJ Surg Interv Health Technol. 2023 Feb 20;5(1):e000137. doi: 10.1136/bmjsit-2022-000137. eCollection 2023.
4
Relationship between Cytomegalovirus Viremia and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplant Recipients with Different Donor Ages.不同供体年龄的肾移植受者中巨细胞病毒血症与长期预后的关系
Microorganisms. 2023 Feb 11;11(2):458. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms11020458.
5
Differences between kidney retransplant recipients as identified by machine learning consensus clustering.基于机器学习共识聚类识别的肾移植受者差异。
Clin Transplant. 2023 May;37(5):e14943. doi: 10.1111/ctr.14943. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
6
Use of Machine Learning Consensus Clustering to Identify Distinct Subtypes of Black Kidney Transplant Recipients and Associated Outcomes.运用机器学习共识聚类来识别黑种人肾移植受者的不同亚型及其相关结局。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Jul 1;157(7):e221286. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.1286. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
7
Technology-Enabled Care and Artificial Intelligence in Kidney Transplantation.肾脏移植中的技术支持护理与人工智能
Curr Transplant Rep. 2021;8(3):235-240. doi: 10.1007/s40472-021-00336-z. Epub 2021 Jul 28.
8
Non-adherence assessment to immunosuppressant therapy with a self-report questionnaire and intra-patient variability in renal transplantation: risk factors and clinical correlations.使用自我报告问卷评估肾移植患者免疫抑制剂治疗的不依从性及患者内个体间变异:危险因素和临床相关性。
Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2023 Feb;75(1):92-98. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04244-2. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Epidemiology of end-stage kidney disease.终末期肾病的流行病学。
Semin Vasc Surg. 2021 Mar;34(1):71-78. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2021.02.010. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
10
OPTN/SRTR 2019 Annual Data Report: Kidney.OPTN/SRTR 2019 年度数据报告:肾脏。
Am J Transplant. 2021 Feb;21 Suppl 2:21-137. doi: 10.1111/ajt.16502.