Rudisill Toni Marie, Innes Karen Kim, Wen Sijin, Haggerty Treah, Smith Gordon S
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia.
AJPM Focus. 2023 Mar;2(1). doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2022.100053. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
A common side effect of cannabidiol is drowsiness, which could impact safe driving. This study's purpose was to determine the feasibility and whether cannabidiol impacts simulated driving performance.
This was a randomized, parallel-group, sex-stratified, double-blind, pilot trial that consisted of a volunteer sample of healthy, currently driving college students. Participants were randomized and allocated to receive a placebo (=19) or 300 mg cannabidiol (=21) by oral syringe. Participants completed a ~40-minute driving simulation. A post-test survey assessed acceptability. The primary outcomes were mean SD of lateral position, total percent time the individual drove outside travel lanes, total collisions, time to initial collision, and mean brake reaction time. Outcomes were compared between groups using Student's -tests and Cox proportional hazards models.
None of the relationships were statistically significant, but the study was underpowered. Those receiving cannabidiol experienced slightly more collisions (0.90 vs 0.68, =0.57) and had slightly higher mean SD of lateral position and slower brake reaction times (0.60 vs 0.58 seconds, =0.61) than those who received placebo. Participants were satisfied with their experiences.
The design was feasible. Larger trials may be warranted because it is unclear whether the small differences in performance seen in the cannabidiol group were clinically relevant.
大麻二酚的一种常见副作用是嗜睡,这可能会影响安全驾驶。本研究的目的是确定其可行性以及大麻二酚是否会影响模拟驾驶性能。
这是一项随机、平行组、按性别分层、双盲的试点试验,由健康的在校大学生志愿者样本组成。参与者被随机分配,通过口服注射器接受安慰剂(=19)或300毫克大麻二酚(=21)。参与者完成了约40分钟的驾驶模拟。一项测试后调查评估了可接受性。主要结果包括横向位置的平均标准差、个体在行车道外驾驶的总时间百分比、总碰撞次数、首次碰撞时间以及平均制动反应时间。使用学生t检验和Cox比例风险模型对组间结果进行比较。
没有一种关系具有统计学意义,但该研究的效能不足。与接受安慰剂的参与者相比,接受大麻二酚的参与者经历的碰撞略多(0.90对0.68,P = 0.57),横向位置的平均标准差略高,制动反应时间稍慢(0.60秒对0.58秒,P = 0.61)。参与者对他们的体验感到满意。
该设计是可行的。可能需要进行更大规模的试验,因为尚不清楚大麻二酚组中观察到的性能微小差异是否具有临床相关性。