Gürgöze Ramazan, Özüçelik Doğaç Niyazi, Yılmaz Mustafa, Doğan Halil
First and Emergency Aid Unit, Elazığ Provincial Health Directorate, Elazığ, Türkiye.
Clinic of Emergency Medicine, Dr. Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Turk J Surg. 2022 Sep 19;38(3):237-242. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2022.5681. eCollection 2022 Sep.
Hospitalization, mortality and trauma scores are important in trauma patients aged ≥65 years. The present study aimed to investigate the use of trauma scores in the prediction of hospitalisation and mortality in trauma patients aged ≥65 years.
Patients aged ≥65 years who presented to the emergency department with trauma over a one-year period were included in the study. Baseline data of the patients together with their Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS), Injury Severity Score (ISS), hospitalisation and mortality were analysed.
A total of 2264 patients were included in the study, of whom 1434 (63.3%) were women. The most common mechanism of trauma was simple falls. Mean GCS scores, RTSs and ISSs of the inpatients were 14.87 ± 0.99, 6.97 ± 0.343 and 7.22 ± 5.826, respectively. Furthermore, a significant negative correlation was found between the duration of hospitalisation and GCS scores (r= -0.158, p <0.001) and RTSs (r= -0.133, p <0.001), whereas a positive significant correlation with ISSs (r= 0.306, p <0.001) was observed. The ISSs (p <0.001) of the deceased individuals were significantly elevated, whereas their GCS scores (p <0.001) and RTSs (p <0.001) were significantly decreased.
All trauma scoring systems can be used to predict hospitalisation, but the results of the present study suggest that the use of ISS and GCS in making the decision regarding mortality is more appropriate.
住院治疗情况、死亡率和创伤评分对于65岁及以上的创伤患者而言至关重要。本研究旨在探讨创伤评分在预测65岁及以上创伤患者的住院治疗情况和死亡率方面的应用。
本研究纳入了在一年时间内因创伤到急诊科就诊的65岁及以上患者。分析了患者的基线数据以及他们的格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)、修订创伤评分(RTS)、损伤严重程度评分(ISS)、住院治疗情况和死亡率。
本研究共纳入2264例患者,其中1434例(63.3%)为女性。最常见的创伤机制是单纯跌倒。住院患者的平均GCS评分、RTS评分和ISS评分分别为14.87±0.99、6.97±0.343和7.22±5.826。此外,发现住院时间与GCS评分(r = -0.158,p <0.001)和RTS评分(r = -0.133,p <0.001)之间存在显著负相关,而与ISS评分(r = 0.306,p <0.001)存在显著正相关。死亡患者的ISS评分(p <0.001)显著升高,而他们的GCS评分(p <0.001)和RTS评分(p <0.001)显著降低。
所有创伤评分系统均可用于预测住院治疗情况,但本研究结果表明,使用ISS和GCS来做出关于死亡率的决策更为合适。