Kim Jae-Guk, Choi Hyun-Young, Kang Gu-Hyun, Jang Yong-Soo, Kim Wonhee, Lee Yoonje, Ahn Chiwon
Department of Emergency Medicine, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 07441, Republic of Korea.
Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Republic of Korea.
J Pers Med. 2024 Jun 23;14(7):674. doi: 10.3390/jpm14070674.
This study investigated the impact of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) on treatment approaches and survival outcomes in trauma patients, focusing on comparing elderly (≥65 years) with non-elderly patients. It analyzed adult trauma cases with abnormal Revised Trauma Scores from January to December 2019, categorizing patients into three severity groups based on ISS: mild (1-8), moderate (9-15), and severe (≥16). The study examined how ISS influenced therapeutic interventions and survival among elderly patients, comparing these outcomes to non-elderly patients using multivariable logistic regression analysis. In 16,336 adult trauma cases out of 52,262 patients, including 4886 elderly and 11,450 non-elderly patients, findings revealed that in the severe group, elderly patients had a lower, though not statistically significant, incidence of surgical or embolization interventions compared to the moderate group, differing from non-elderly patients. No significant differences were observed in the mild group between elderly and non-elderly patients. However, elderly patients had higher intervention rates in the moderate group and lower in the severe group, with significantly lower survival-to-discharge rates in the severe group. The ISS is insufficient for assessing trauma severity in elderly patients. Additional tools are needed for better evaluation and treatment decisions.
本研究调查了损伤严重程度评分(ISS)对创伤患者治疗方法和生存结果的影响,重点是比较老年(≥65岁)患者和非老年患者。该研究分析了2019年1月至12月修订创伤评分异常的成年创伤病例,根据ISS将患者分为三个严重程度组:轻度(1-8)、中度(9-15)和重度(≥16)。该研究使用多变量逻辑回归分析,研究了ISS如何影响老年患者的治疗干预和生存情况,并将这些结果与非老年患者进行比较。在52262名患者中的16336例成年创伤病例中,包括4886例老年患者和11450例非老年患者,研究结果显示,在重度组中,与中度组相比,老年患者进行手术或栓塞干预的发生率较低,尽管无统计学意义,这与非老年患者不同。在轻度组中,老年患者和非老年患者之间未观察到显著差异。然而,老年患者在中度组中的干预率较高,在重度组中的干预率较低,重度组的出院生存率显著较低。ISS不足以评估老年患者的创伤严重程度。需要额外的工具来进行更好的评估和治疗决策。