Sameer Yomna, Eid Yasmine, Veenhoven Ruut
College of Business, Abu Dhabi University, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
University of London Recognized Teaching Center, Arab Academy for Science, Technology and Maritime Transport (AASTMT), Cairo, Egypt.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 10;13:957235. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.957235. eCollection 2022.
"Meaning" and "happiness" are leading topics in positive psychology, but their relationship is not well understood. The first step to better understanding is to inspect the pattern of correlations found in the research literature. Specifically, we seek answers to the following questions of fact: (1) Is there a correlation between perceived meaning of life and satisfaction with life? (2) If so, is that correlation positive or negative? (3) How strong is this correlation? (4) How variable is this correlation across persons and situations? (5) Do the correlations differ across components of happiness? (6) What aspects of meaning are most/least associated with happiness? (7) What sources of meaning are most/least associated with happiness? (8) Does seeing meaning relate differently to happiness than searching for meaning?
We took stock of the available research findings, using the World Database of Happiness, which holds standardized descriptions of 171 observed relations between perceived meaning of life and satisfaction with life.
We found strong correlations between happiness and the degree of perceived meaning in life but little correlation with the pursuit of meaning. While the correlation with the degree of meaning is positive at the micro-level of individuals, it appears to be negative at the macro-level of nations.
Having established the above mentioned matters of fact, we considered the following questions on causality: (1) Is there an innate need for meaning? (2) How does the perceived meaning of life otherwise affect satisfaction with life? (3) How does satisfaction with life affect the perceived the meaning of life? (4) Why is the correlation positive at the micro-level of individuals, but negative at the macro-level of nations?
We conclude that there is no innate human need for meaning. Still, the perceived meaning of life can affect life satisfaction in various other ways, while life satisfaction will also affect the sense of meaning. Both positive and negative effects can be involved, the balance of which tends to be positive for seeing meaning but close to neutral for pursuing meaning.
“意义”和“幸福”是积极心理学中的主要话题,但它们之间的关系尚未得到充分理解。更好理解这一关系的第一步是审视研究文献中发现的相关模式。具体而言,我们寻求以下事实性问题的答案:(1)生活意义感与生活满意度之间是否存在关联?(2)如果存在,这种关联是正相关还是负相关?(3)这种关联有多强?(4)这种关联在不同人和不同情境下的变化程度如何?(5)幸福感各组成部分之间的关联是否存在差异?(6)意义的哪些方面与幸福最相关/最不相关?(7)意义的哪些来源与幸福最相关/最不相关?(8)看待意义与寻找意义对幸福的影响是否不同?
我们利用世界幸福数据库梳理了现有的研究结果,该数据库包含了171项关于生活意义感与生活满意度之间观察到的关系的标准化描述。
我们发现幸福与生活意义感程度之间存在强关联,但与对意义的追求关联不大。虽然在个体微观层面上与意义程度的关联是正相关,但在国家宏观层面上似乎是负相关。
在确定上述事实之后,我们思考了以下因果关系问题:(1)是否存在对意义的内在需求?(2)生活意义感在其他方面如何影响生活满意度?(3)生活满意度如何影响生活意义感?(4)为什么在个体微观层面上的关联是正相关,而在国家宏观层面上是负相关?
我们得出结论,人类不存在对意义的内在需求。尽管如此,生活意义感仍可以通过多种其他方式影响生活满意度,而生活满意度也会影响意义感。正负效应可能都存在,对于看待意义而言,这种平衡倾向于积极,但对于追求意义而言,接近中性。