• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对肿瘤性和非肿瘤性脑出血perihematomal 水肿特征的诊断价值进行外部验证。

External validation of the diagnostic value of perihematomal edema characteristics in neoplastic and non-neoplastic intracerebral hemorrhage.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin Institute of Health, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Neurol. 2023 Jun;30(6):1686-1695. doi: 10.1111/ene.15760. Epub 2023 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1111/ene.15760
PMID:36847734
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Neoplastic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) may be incorrectly identified as non-neoplastic ICH on imaging. Relative perihematomal edema (relPHE) on computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as a marker to discriminate neoplastic from non-neoplastic ICH but has not been externally validated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discriminatory power of relPHE in an independent cohort.

METHODS

A total of 291 patients with acute ICH on CT and follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included in this single-center retrospective study. ICH subjects were dichotomized into non-neoplastic or neoplastic ICH based on the diagnosis on the follow-up MRI. ICH and PHE volumes and density values were derived from semi-manually segmented CT scans. Calculated PHE characteristics for discriminating neoplastic ICH were evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. ROC curve-associated cut-offs were calculated and compared between the initial and the validation cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 116 patients (39.86%) with neoplastic ICH and 175 (60.14%) with non-neoplastic ICH were included. Median PHE volumes, relPHE, and relPHE adjusted for hematoma density were significantly higher in subjects with neoplastic ICH (all p values <0.001). ROC curves for relPHE had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.66-0.78) and an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI 0.76-0.87) for adjusted relPHE. The cut-offs were identical in the two cohorts, with >0.70 for relPHE and >0.01 for adjusted relPHE.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative perihematomal edema and adjusted relPHE accurately discriminated neoplastic from non-neoplastic ICH on CT imaging in an external patient cohort. These results confirmed the findings of the initial study and may improve clinical decision making.

摘要

背景与目的

在影像学上,肿瘤性脑内出血(ICH)可能被错误地识别为非肿瘤性 ICH。CT 上的相对血肿周围水肿(relPHE)已被提出作为区分肿瘤性和非肿瘤性 ICH 的标志物,但尚未经过外部验证。本研究的目的是在一个独立的队列中评估 relPHE 的鉴别能力。

方法

本单中心回顾性研究共纳入 291 例 CT 检查发现急性 ICH 且有随访 MRI 的患者。根据随访 MRI 诊断,将 ICH 患者分为非肿瘤性或肿瘤性 ICH。从半手动分割 CT 扫描中得出 ICH 和 PHE 体积及密度值。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估用于区分肿瘤性 ICH 的 PHE 特征。计算 ROC 曲线相关的截断值,并在初始和验证队列中进行比较。

结果

共纳入 116 例(39.86%)肿瘤性 ICH 患者和 175 例(60.14%)非肿瘤性 ICH 患者。肿瘤性 ICH 患者的 PHE 体积、relPHE 和调整血肿密度后的 relPHE 中位数均显著更高(所有 p 值均<0.001)。relPHE 的 ROC 曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.72(95%置信区间[CI] 0.66-0.78),调整后的 relPHE 的 AUC 为 0.81(95% CI 0.76-0.87)。两个队列的截断值相同,relPHE >0.70,调整后的 relPHE >0.01。

结论

在外部患者队列中,相对血肿周围水肿和调整后的 relPHE 在 CT 成像上能准确区分肿瘤性和非肿瘤性 ICH。这些结果证实了初始研究的发现,可能有助于临床决策。

相似文献

1
External validation of the diagnostic value of perihematomal edema characteristics in neoplastic and non-neoplastic intracerebral hemorrhage.对肿瘤性和非肿瘤性脑出血perihematomal 水肿特征的诊断价值进行外部验证。
Eur J Neurol. 2023 Jun;30(6):1686-1695. doi: 10.1111/ene.15760. Epub 2023 Mar 23.
2
Neoplastic and Non-Neoplastic Causes of Acute Intracerebral Hemorrhage on CT : The Diagnostic Value of Perihematomal Edema.CT 上急性脑出血的肿瘤性和非肿瘤性病因:血肿周围水肿的诊断价值
Clin Neuroradiol. 2020 Jun;30(2):271-278. doi: 10.1007/s00062-019-00774-4. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
3
Perihematomal Edema Is Greater in the Presence of a Spot Sign but Does Not Predict Intracerebral Hematoma Expansion.血肿周围水肿在存在斑点征时更明显,但不能预测颅内血肿扩大。
Stroke. 2016 Feb;47(2):350-5. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.011295. Epub 2015 Dec 22.
4
Validation of perihematomal edema expansion as a new imaging biomarker to predict clinical outcome in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.验证血肿周围水肿扩大作为一种新的影像学生物标志物预测脑出血患者临床转归。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Sep;31(9):106692. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106692. Epub 2022 Aug 3.
5
Perihematomal edema in primary intracerebral hemorrhage is plasma derived.原发性脑出血中的血肿周围水肿源自血浆。
Stroke. 2004 Aug;35(8):1879-85. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000131807.54742.1a. Epub 2004 Jun 3.
6
Comparison of different noncontrast computed tomographic markers for predicting early perihematomal edema expansion in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.比较不同的非对比计算机断层扫描标志物,以预测脑出血患者早期血肿周围水肿扩大。
J Clin Neurosci. 2023 Jun;112:1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2023.03.006. Epub 2023 Apr 1.
7
Combination of Hematoma Volume and Perihematoma Radiomics Analysis on Baseline CT Scan Predicts the Growth of Perihematomal Edema.基于基线CT扫描的血肿体积与血肿周围影像组学分析相结合可预测血肿周围水肿的增长。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Mar;33(1):199-209. doi: 10.1007/s00062-022-01201-x. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
8
A comprehensive prediction model predicts perihematomal edema growth in the acute stage after intracerebral hemorrhage.一个全面的预测模型预测了脑出血后急性阶段的血肿周围水肿增长。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Oct;245:108495. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108495. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
9
Measurement of perihematomal edema in intracerebral hemorrhage.脑出血周围血肿水肿的测量。
Stroke. 2015 Apr;46(4):1116-9. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007565. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
10
Association of molecular markers with perihematomal edema and clinical outcome in intracerebral hemorrhage.分子标志物与脑出血患者血肿周围水肿及临床转归的相关性研究。
Stroke. 2013 Mar;44(3):658-63. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.673590. Epub 2013 Feb 6.

引用本文的文献

1
An Explainable AI Exploration of the Machine Learning Classification of Neoplastic Intracerebral Hemorrhage from Non-Contrast CT.基于非增强CT的脑内肿瘤性出血机器学习分类的可解释人工智能探索
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jul 29;17(15):2502. doi: 10.3390/cancers17152502.
2
Evolution of Perihematomal Edema Mean Hounsfield Unit and Its Association with Clinical Outcome in Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Post Hoc Analysis of the i-DEF Trial.脑出血周围血肿水肿平均亨氏单位的演变及其与临床结局的关联:i-DEF试验的事后分析
Neurocrit Care. 2025 Aug 11. doi: 10.1007/s12028-025-02337-7.
3
Clinical and imaging manifestations of intracerebral hemorrhage in brain tumors and metastatic lesions: a comprehensive overview.
脑肿瘤和转移瘤中脑出血的临床与影像学表现:全面概述
J Neurooncol. 2024 Dec;170(3):567-578. doi: 10.1007/s11060-024-04811-2. Epub 2024 Sep 2.