Department of Radiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023 Nov;58(5):1521-1530. doi: 10.1002/jmri.28653. Epub 2023 Feb 27.
The clinical application of coronary MR angiography (MRA) remains limited due to its long acquisition time and often unsatisfactory image quality. A compressed sensing artificial intelligence (CSAI) framework was recently introduced to overcome these limitations, but its feasibility in coronary MRA is unknown.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of noncontrast-enhanced coronary MRA with CSAI in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).
Prospective observational study.
A total of 64 consecutive patients (mean age ± standard deviation [SD]: 59 ± 10 years, 48.4% females) with suspected CAD.
FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: A 3.0-T, balanced steady-state free precession sequence.
Three observers evaluated the image quality for 15 coronary segments of the right and left coronary arteries using a 5-point scoring system (1 = not visible; 5 = excellent). Image scores ≥3 were considered diagnostic. Furthermore, the detection of CAD with ≥50% stenosis was evaluated in comparison to reference standard coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA). Mean acquisition times for CSAI-based coronary MRA were measured.
For each patient, vessel and segment, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CSAI-based coronary MRA for detecting CAD with ≥50% stenosis according to coronary CTA were calculated. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the interobserver agreement.
The mean MR acquisition time ± SD was 8.1 ± 2.4 minutes. Twenty-five (39.1%) patients had CAD with ≥50% stenosis on coronary CTA and 29 (45.3%) patients on MRA. A total of 885 segments on the CTA images and 818/885 (92.4%) coronary MRA segments were diagnostic (image score ≥3). The sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were as follows: per patient (92.0%, 84.6%, and 87.5%), per vessel (82.9%, 93.4%, and 91.1%), and per segment (77.6%, 98.2%, and 96.6%), respectively. The ICCs for image quality and stenosis assessment were 0.76-0.99 and 0.66-1.00, respectively.
The image quality and diagnostic performance of coronary MRA with CSAI may show good results in comparison to coronary CTA in patients with suspected CAD.
由于采集时间长且图像质量往往不尽如人意,冠状动脉磁共振血管造影(MRA)的临床应用仍然受到限制。最近引入了一种压缩感知人工智能(CSAI)框架来克服这些限制,但它在冠状动脉 MRA 中的可行性尚不清楚。
评估非对比增强冠状动脉 MRA 联合 CSAI 在疑似冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中的诊断性能。
前瞻性观察研究。
共纳入 64 例连续疑似 CAD 患者(平均年龄±标准差[SD]:59±10 岁,48.4%为女性)。
磁场强度/序列:3.0T 平衡稳态自由进动序列。
三位观察者使用 5 分制(1=不可见;5=极好)对右冠状动脉和左冠状动脉的 15 个冠状动脉节段的图像质量进行评分。图像评分≥3 被认为具有诊断意义。此外,还将冠状动脉计算机断层血管造影(CTA)作为参考标准评估≥50%狭窄的 CAD 的检出情况。测量 CSAI 基于的冠状动脉 MRA 的平均采集时间。
对于每位患者、血管和节段,根据冠状动脉 CTA 计算 CSAI 基于的冠状动脉 MRA 检测≥50%狭窄的 CAD 的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评估观察者间的一致性。
MR 采集时间的平均值±标准差为 8.1±2.4 分钟。25 例(39.1%)患者在冠状动脉 CTA 上存在≥50%狭窄,29 例(45.3%)患者在 MRA 上存在≥50%狭窄。CTA 图像上共有 885 个节段,818/885(92.4%)个冠状动脉 MRA 节段具有诊断意义(图像评分≥3)。患者的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性分别为 92.0%、84.6%和 87.5%,血管为 82.9%、93.4%和 91.1%,节段为 77.6%、98.2%和 96.6%。图像质量和狭窄评估的 ICC 分别为 0.76-0.99 和 0.66-1.00。
在疑似 CAD 患者中,与冠状动脉 CTA 相比,CSAI 冠状动脉 MRA 的图像质量和诊断性能可能具有较好的结果。
1
2